[ncl-talk] Question about gsn*String positioning with gsn_csm_x2y2 routine

[Alexander Schaefer]

Hi all,

I was wondering if anyone knows why there is a positioning issue with the strings adjacent to the top of the plot when using the gsn_csm_x2y2 plotting routine as opposed to the gsn_csm_contour plotting routine.  I haven’t noticed this in any of the other plotting routines I have used to date.  When I turn off the top axis tick marks, the gsn*Strings don’t get translated down to the top of the plot like they standardly do.  The first page of the attached pdf illustrates the xy plot with the string positioning issue I am referring to and the second page shows what I am comparing it to, in my case, with the gsn*Strings in the correct position. 

I have created a script to reduce my scripts to basically just resources (maybe they are interacting in an odd way) and plotting of fake data to illustrate my question so hopefully it is less confusing than digging through originals.  These plots are made in 2 separate scripts when I use them but combine to reduce file count here.

If anyone has some insight on the issue or how to fix it (maybe I missed something) I would greatly appreciate the help.

Thanks,
-Alex

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: plot_inquiry.ncl
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4061 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20160729/8c3bad33/attachment-0001.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: plot_inquiry.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 308413 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20160729/8c3bad33/attachment-0001.pdf 
-------------- next part --------------