[ncl-talk] RasterFill and MissingValFill

[Adam Phillips]

Hi Evelyn,
There should not be any difference in how the missing values are shaded.
Can you send us a simplified version of your script and data files so we
can take a look?  If the data files are too big to send over ncl-talk you
can use our ftp site:
http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/report_bug.shtml#HowToFTP
Also, please let us know what version of NCL you are using..
Adam

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Evelyn Grell - NOAA Affiliate <
evelyn.grell at noaa.gov> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am plotting cross-sections and was filling the area below ground with a
> gray fill, more or less representing the terrain.  This seemed to be
> working fine until I plotted a field using cnFillMode  = "RasterFill".  In
> that case, the "missing" perimeter line is in the same place, but the gray
> fill does not cover the entire area under the perimeter line.  See attached
> plots.
> Since I would like to compare plots -- some with rasterfill and some with
> the default areafill, it is awkward to explain why the terrain looks
> different.  Is there a way around this?  I can remove the perimeter line,
> but the gray-filled area is different.
>
> Relevant resources:
>
>      res at cnMissingValPerimOn     = True
>      res at cnMissingValFillColor   = "gray"
>      res at cnMissingValFillPattern = 0
>
> The only difference between plots is whether this line is used:
>      resDBZ at cnFillMode      = "RasterFill"
>
> Thanks,
> Evelyn
>
> _______________________________________________
> ncl-talk mailing list
> ncl-talk at ucar.edu
> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>
>


-- 
Adam Phillips
Associate Scientist,  Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, NCAR
www.cgd.ucar.edu/staff/asphilli/   303-497-1726

<http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/staff/asphilli>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20151118/5eb9f490/attachment.html