[Met_help] GRIB files
John Halley Gotway
johnhg at rap.ucar.edu
Tue Mar 10 09:44:31 MDT 2009
Mark,
Unfortunately, I do not know of any straight-forward way to post-process your WRF output files for use in MET other than by using WPP.
However, I did speak with the folks who provide support for WPP this morning, and they assured me that this issue will be fixed in the next version of WPP - due to be released with WRFv3.1 no later
than the end of this month. If you're under a big time crunch, they may be able to get you a beta version of WPP to test out - in a week or two - before WRF is actually released. Just contact
wrfhelp is you'd like to pursue that.
I'd say that's your best bet.
Thanks,
John Halley Gotway
johnhg at ucar.edu
Mark Seefeldt wrote:
> I am trying to use the point_stat tool for comparisons of WRF output to
> observations for a model sensitivity study. We are running month-long
> simulations. In the process of creating the GRIB files using WPP, I
> have come across a small bug/design error. The forecast hour is only
> able to go up to 256 hours and my simulations run out to 31 days, or
> some 768 hours. I have contacted wrfhelp regarding this problem, they
> have verified it, and will at some point release a fix to it. However,
> until then I am still stuck. Are there any other methods with which I
> can get the WRF data to be used by MET, other than GRIB files from WPP?
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark Seefeldt
> _______________________________________________
> Met_help mailing list
> Met_help at mailman.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/met_help
More information about the Met_help
mailing list