[Go-essp-tech] ESGF Telco 2011-10-25

Tue Oct 25 01:30:06 MDT 2011

I would like to go ahead.  I've rearranged the agenda to focus on issues we can discuss with those who can attend.  I'll write minutes and we know we can't cover some items in detail without others' input.

It is not certain I can make next week so I don't want to kick this can down the road.

Cheers,
Stephen.

---
Stephen Pascoe  +44 (0)1235 445980
Centre of Environmental Data Archival
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK

-----Original Message-----
From: go-essp-tech-bounces at ucar.edu [mailto:go-essp-tech-bounces at ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Nienhouse
Sent: 25 October 2011 01:36
To: Gavin M. Bell
Cc: go-essp-tech at ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [Go-essp-tech] ESGF Telco 2011-10-25

Hi All,

Let's tentatively cancel tomorrow's call pending input from our EU 
colleagues.

We'll plan to hold a CMIP5 operations priorities discussion next week, 
2011-10-31. 

As noted, prioritising development and maintenance for CMIP5 is proving 
difficult whilst we are all so busy keeping the system running.   A 
review of tasks is urgently needed.

Regards,

-Eric

Gavin M. Bell wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I still say NO.  Can we just cancel the meeting so that those that 
> want to be there can be there.  Indeed quite a few *KEY* people won't 
> be able to make the call with topics that are on the agenda as well as 
> topics with information that are important to be heard and learned 
> about.  We have rescheduled meetings before, so let's do that again 
> now.  I am not understanding why this can't be accommodated?
>
> Again, that's my $0.02... supported by cogent arguments.
>
> Please cancel the call.
> Thanks
>
> On 10/24/11 3:04 PM, Eric Nienhouse wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I understand many of us may not be able to attend tomorrow's call.  I 
>> suggest the following:
>>
>> We *still convene* the meeting tomorrow 10/25 as we planned during last 
>> week's call.
>>
>> http://esgf.org/wiki/EsgfCmip5Meetings 
>> <http://esgf.org/wiki/EsgfCmip5Meetings#preview>
>>
>> We'll treat tomorrow's meeting as preparation for a CMIP5 operations 
>> priorities discussion which will be held next week, 2011-10-31.
>>
>> Reasonable?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Eric
>>
>> Cinquini, Luca (3880) wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>> FYI I also will be unavailable to attend the call, since I'll be at 
>>> WCRP... lots of other ESGF people will be there too I think.
>>> thanks, Luca
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Gavin M. Bell wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>>
>>>> I think we should NOT have this meeting until next Tuesday.
>>>> I for one cannot make the meeting and would really like to, and I 
>>>> think other key members of the team will not be available.  It is my 
>>>> vote that this meeting be moved to next Tuesday.
>>>>
>>>> I have salient information and am interested in this discussion on 
>>>> Metrics, GridFTP, DRS etc.
>>>> As well as would like to learn about the other agenda items.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> On 10/22/11 1:58 AM, stephen.pascoe at stfc.ac.uk wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> I understand many people may be unavailable for the ESGF telco this 
>>>>> Tuesday because of the WCRP meeting.  However, we'd like to hold it 
>>>>> anyway.  Prioritising development and maintenance for CMIP5 is 
>>>>> proving difficult whilst we are all so busy keeping the running so I 
>>>>> think a review of tasks is urgently needed.  The latest agenda is at 
>>>>> http://esgf.org/wiki/EsgfCmip5Meetings 
>>>>> <http://esgf.org/wiki/EsgfCmip5Meetings#preview> and summarised below. 
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> We expect at least BADC and NCAR to be on the call.  Could anyone 
>>>>> else who intends to make it email me directly so that we can refine 
>>>>> the agenda and make best use of time. 
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Stephen.
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> Agenda
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Effective prioritizing of tasks for operational CMIP5:
>>>>>
>>>>>     1. Metrics -- federation-wide download statistics
>>>>>
>>>>>     1. Next Generation Search -- Gateway 2.0 deployment schedule
>>>>>
>>>>>     1. DRS conformance.  Can Karl's scriptable download scenario be 
>>>>> achieved?
>>>>>
>>>>>     1. Authorization-aware search
>>>>>
>>>>>     1. Trackback / CIM harvest consistent across Gateways
>>>>>
>>>>>     1. Replication
>>>>>
>>>>>     1. OPeNDAP -- security, consistent configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>>     1. Improving MyProxy user experience.  DML vs. MyProxyLogon
>>>>>
>>>>>     1. End-user GridFTP
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Stephen Pascoe  +44 (0)1235 445980
>>>>>
>>>>> Centre of Environmental Data Archival
>>>>>
>>>>> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Scanned by iCritical.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> -- 
>>>> Gavin M. Bell
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>  "Never mistake a clear view for a short distance."
>>>>        	       -Paul Saffo
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
>>>> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu <mailto:GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu>
>>>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
>>> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
>>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
>>>   
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
>> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
>>     
>
> -- 
> Gavin M. Bell
> --
>
>  "Never mistake a clear view for a short distance."
>        	       -Paul Saffo
>
>   

_______________________________________________
GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
-- 
Scanned by iCritical.