[Go-essp-tech] ESGF Telco 2011-10-25

Gavin M. Bell gavin at llnl.gov
Mon Oct 24 18:59:24 MDT 2011


Hi,

Thanks for rescheduling the meeting.  I am confident the EU partners
would agree with my motion to reschedule.  I believe the meetings are
most effective when we have enough key personnel able to attend.  As
noted quite a few such key people won't be able to attend.  I look
forward to meeting /next week/ when we can all hash out these important
issues.
Tuesday, November 31st it is (please don't forget go change the wiki).

Thanks.

On 10/24/11 5:36 PM, Eric Nienhouse wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Let's tentatively cancel tomorrow's call pending input from our EU 
> colleagues.
>
> We'll plan to hold a CMIP5 operations priorities discussion next week, 
> 2011-10-31. 
>
> As noted, prioritising development and maintenance for CMIP5 is proving 
> difficult whilst we are all so busy keeping the system running.   A 
> review of tasks is urgently needed.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Eric
>
> Gavin M. Bell wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I still say NO.  Can we just cancel the meeting so that those that 
>> want to be there can be there.  Indeed quite a few *KEY* people won't 
>> be able to make the call with topics that are on the agenda as well as 
>> topics with information that are important to be heard and learned 
>> about.  We have rescheduled meetings before, so let's do that again 
>> now.  I am not understanding why this can't be accommodated?
>>
>> Again, that's my $0.02... supported by cogent arguments.
>>
>> Please cancel the call.
>> Thanks
>>
>> On 10/24/11 3:04 PM, Eric Nienhouse wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I understand many of us may not be able to attend tomorrow's call.  I 
>>> suggest the following:
>>>
>>> We *still convene* the meeting tomorrow 10/25 as we planned during last 
>>> week's call.
>>>
>>> http://esgf.org/wiki/EsgfCmip5Meetings 
>>> <http://esgf.org/wiki/EsgfCmip5Meetings#preview>
>>>
>>> We'll treat tomorrow's meeting as preparation for a CMIP5 operations 
>>> priorities discussion which will be held next week, 2011-10-31.
>>>
>>> Reasonable?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Eric
>>>
>>> Cinquini, Luca (3880) wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>> FYI I also will be unavailable to attend the call, since I'll be at 
>>>> WCRP... lots of other ESGF people will be there too I think.
>>>> thanks, Luca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Gavin M. Bell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we should NOT have this meeting until next Tuesday.
>>>>> I for one cannot make the meeting and would really like to, and I 
>>>>> think other key members of the team will not be available.  It is my 
>>>>> vote that this meeting be moved to next Tuesday.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have salient information and am interested in this discussion on 
>>>>> Metrics, GridFTP, DRS etc.
>>>>> As well as would like to learn about the other agenda items.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/22/11 1:58 AM, stephen.pascoe at stfc.ac.uk wrote:
>>>>>         
>>>>>> I understand many people may be unavailable for the ESGF telco this 
>>>>>> Tuesday because of the WCRP meeting.  However, we'd like to hold it 
>>>>>> anyway.  Prioritising development and maintenance for CMIP5 is 
>>>>>> proving difficult whilst we are all so busy keeping the running so I 
>>>>>> think a review of tasks is urgently needed.  The latest agenda is at 
>>>>>> http://esgf.org/wiki/EsgfCmip5Meetings 
>>>>>> <http://esgf.org/wiki/EsgfCmip5Meetings#preview> and summarised below. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We expect at least BADC and NCAR to be on the call.  Could anyone 
>>>>>> else who intends to make it email me directly so that we can refine 
>>>>>> the agenda and make best use of time. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stephen.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agenda
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Effective prioritizing of tasks for operational CMIP5:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     1. Metrics -- federation-wide download statistics
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     1. Next Generation Search -- Gateway 2.0 deployment schedule
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     1. DRS conformance.  Can Karl's scriptable download scenario be 
>>>>>> achieved?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     1. Authorization-aware search
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     1. Trackback / CIM harvest consistent across Gateways
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     1. Replication
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     1. OPeNDAP -- security, consistent configuration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     1. Improving MyProxy user experience.  DML vs. MyProxyLogon
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     1. End-user GridFTP
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stephen Pascoe  +44 (0)1235 445980
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Centre of Environmental Data Archival
>>>>>>
>>>>>> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Scanned by iCritical.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Gavin M. Bell
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>  "Never mistake a clear view for a short distance."
>>>>>        	       -Paul Saffo
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
>>>>> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu <mailto:GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu>
>>>>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
>>>>>         
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
>>>> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
>>>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
>>> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
>>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
>>>     
>> -- 
>> Gavin M. Bell
>> --
>>
>>  "Never mistake a clear view for a short distance."
>>        	       -Paul Saffo
>>
>>   

-- 
Gavin M. Bell
--

 "Never mistake a clear view for a short distance."
       	       -Paul Saffo


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/go-essp-tech/attachments/20111024/5fecf969/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list