[Go-essp-tech] Out-of-bounds data and QC level 1 checks

[Bentley, Philip]

Hi Balaji, 

> >
> > qc level two requires both to have been passed and the "stitching 
> > together" to have happened. So, I fully expect data to be 
> published at 
> > data nodes which has not been accompanied by metafor metadata.
> 
> Since it is almost inevitable that this will happen, I would 
> suggest that we have a nomenclature element for "data is 
> L1-conformant but metadata isn't yet because we haven't 
> filled out the CIM" ... QC-L1.5?

Sounds like a good plan. What about QC-L1D for data and QC-L1M for
metadata?

Cheers,
Phil