[Go-essp-tech] Out-of-bounds data and QC level 1 checks
Bentley, Philip
philip.bentley at metoffice.gov.uk
Wed Jun 30 02:13:02 MDT 2010
Hi Balaji,
> >
> > qc level two requires both to have been passed and the "stitching
> > together" to have happened. So, I fully expect data to be
> published at
> > data nodes which has not been accompanied by metafor metadata.
>
> Since it is almost inevitable that this will happen, I would
> suggest that we have a nomenclature element for "data is
> L1-conformant but metadata isn't yet because we haven't
> filled out the CIM" ... QC-L1.5?
Sounds like a good plan. What about QC-L1D for data and QC-L1M for
metadata?
Cheers,
Phil
More information about the GO-ESSP-TECH
mailing list