[Wrf-users] WRF-NMM SMPAR Compatibility?

[Pettee, Warren]

Hello,


That's dissappointing. Maybe it will be fixed for future releases, but then again a

dmpar configuration would be more ideal for forecasting anyway.


Thank you,


Warren Pettee
wpettee at uncc.edu
336-257-9239
________________________________
From: Rémi Montroty <montrotyr at mfi.fr>
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:44 PM
To: Pettee, Warren
Cc: wrf users group
Subject: Re: [Wrf-users] WRF-NMM SMPAR Compatibility?


Hi

As far as i know, only dmpar works for nmm core.
Last one we tested was with both intel and gcc compilers on x86_64 amd for v3.5.1 and none worked with smpar.

I did manage to get dmpar+smpar with intel for ARW however.

Best of luck.

Le 23 avr. 2014 18:40, "Pettee, Warren" <wpettee at uncc.edu<mailto:wpettee at uncc.edu>> a écrit :

Has anyone else had trouble building the WRF-NMM(real_nmm) executables when configured for Shared-Memory Parallelism on a multi-core processor? We are running the latest WRF source on an Ubuntu 12.04, x64, Xeon dual core 2.00GHz, 2Gb RAM.


The system configures with Linux x64 gcc/gfortran serial normally, but will not compile the executables if I select the SMPAR option. The WRF-ARW will compile and run fine with SMPAR, it seems to be a NMM issue. I've included my configure and compile log if anyone is interested.


Thanks for any insight,


Warren Pettee
wpettee at uncc.edu<mailto:wpettee at uncc.edu>


_______________________________________________
Wrf-users mailing list
Wrf-users at ucar.edu<mailto:Wrf-users at ucar.edu>
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140424/6bd962b4/attachment.html