[Wrf-users] Reply on "WRF_run (Lia Pervin)"

Tue Apr 8 10:25:35 MDT 2014

Hi Lia,

If I got this right, you are running a test case, which means you probably
have all the input data needed. So we can cross out the possibility of a
"lack of data" problem.
As far as I'm concerned, this problem has to do with the time options
defined in the namelists. Probably, you set different dates on them. Double
check that.

Hope I could help, ;)

*Felipe Neris*

*"O sentimento religioso cósmico é a mais forte motivação da pesquisa
científica."*
* Albert Einstein*

*Luiz Felipe Neris Cardoso*
Departamento de Meteorologia - Instituto de Geociências
Centro de Ciências Matemáticas e da Natureza - Universidade Federal do Rio
de Janeiro

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 PM, <wrf-users-request at ucar.edu> wrote:

> Send Wrf-users mailing list submissions to
>         wrf-users at ucar.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         wrf-users-owner at ucar.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wrf-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: WRFDA Errors over Water (Valerio Capecchi)
>    2. Fwd: WRF_run (Lia Pervin)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:53:41 +0200
> From: Valerio Capecchi <capecchi at lamma.rete.toscana.it>
> Subject: Re: [Wrf-users] WRFDA Errors over Water
> To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
> Cc: messeri <messeri at lamma.rete.toscana.it>
> Message-ID:
>         <CAAB9Paj=
> bX-WUUoSRggVduFw3hSv3Pzb76YV6SrsATcwy9QFMg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Dear wrf-users,
> we're attempting to assimilate both conventional observations
> (METAR/SYNOP/RAOB) and observed surface data (2 m temperature and 10 m
> wind) with sensors on board of commercial ships in the Mediterranean area.
> We want to evaluate the impact of ships derived data in an OSSE (Observing
> System Simulation Experiments) framework, where the horizontal resolution
> of the "virtual" truth is 1 km and the resolution of the numerical
> experiments is 3 km.
>
> Using a custom background error (with method NMC) we have the following
> issue:
> in the interface between sea and land we observe an anomalous heating of
> the land near the harbors where the ships record the data.
> Clearly these data affect improperly the assimilation.
>
> Is anybody facing the same problem?
> Thanks, Valerio
> PS: WRF and WRFDA version is 3.5
>
>
>
>
>
> On 13 February 2012 16:55, Sean Crowell <sean.crowell at noaa.gov> wrote:
>
> > Hi, I am running WRF and WRFDA version 3.3.1 for an OSSE and I am
> > getting some pretty large errors over bodies of water.  The inclusion
> > of surface obs improves the analysis almost everywhere else (over a
> > control run with no assimilation).  Are there any water specific
> > settings in the WRFDA process?  I have the line "iswater = 16" in my
> > namelist for updating the lower boundary condition file, and in my WRF
> > namelist, I haven't changed the land use to MODIS, so far as I can tell.
> >
> > Is there any other obvious reason why the assimilation would degrade
> > the solution over bodies of water?
> >
> > Sean Crowell
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wrf-users mailing list
> > Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> > http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Valerio Capecchi
> La.M.M.A.
> Area CNR - Via Madonna del Piano 10
> Sesto Fiorentino - Firenze - Italia
> Maps: 43.818948 N, 11.201912 E
> Tel: +39 055 4483 066
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140403/ff68e3ca/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:26:23 -0600
> From: Lia Pervin <plia at ualberta.ca>
> Subject: [Wrf-users] Fwd: WRF_run
> To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAFWbOk0O2sk8MUU+CUMTc6b8XAcRTaaAVQKt2SvT6_+OgXy04w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lia Pervin <plia at ualberta.ca>
> Date: Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM
> Subject: WRF_run
> To: Chun-Chao Kuo <chunchao at ualberta.ca>
>
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> Good morning! I have run *JAN00* case and *Katrina*, but *JAN00* giving the
> following message for ./real.exe
> "Domain  1: Current date being processed: 2000-01-24_12:00:00.0000, which
> is loop #   1 out of    5
>  configflags%julyr, %julday, %gmt:        2000          24   12.0000000
>  -------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
>  FATAL CALLED FROM FILE:  <stdin>  LINE:     404
>  error opening met_em.d01.2000-01-24_12:00:00.nc for input; bad date in
> namelist or file not in directory"
>
> For ./wrf.exe the message is "FATAL CALLED FROM FILE:  <stdin>  LINE:
> 70
>   program wrf: error opening wrfinput_d01 for reading ierr=       -1021
>  -------------------------------------------
>  -------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
>  FATAL CALLED FROM FILE:  <stdin>  LINE:      70'.
>
> Similar message for *Katrina* too. I would appreciate if you could help me
> in this regards.
>
> Thanks
>
> Lia
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140403/1301f009/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wrf-users mailing list
> Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>
>
> End of Wrf-users Digest, Vol 116, Issue 3
> *****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140408/731557a7/attachment.html 