<div dir="ltr">Hi Lia,<div><br></div><div>If I got this right, you are running a test case, which means you probably have all the input data needed. So we can cross out the possibility of a "lack of data" problem.</div>
<div>As far as I'm concerned, this problem has to do with the time options defined in the namelists. Probably, you set different dates on them. Double check that.</div><div><br></div><div>Hope I could help, ;)</div><div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><b><font color="#999999">Felipe Neris</font></b><br></div><div><i style="color:rgb(51,102,255)"><br></i></div><div><i style="color:rgb(51,102,255)">"O sentimento religioso cósmico é a mais forte motivação da pesquisa científica."</i><i><br>
<b><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">Albert Einstein</span></b></i> <br><br style="color:rgb(102,102,102)"></div>
<div><b><font color="#999999">Luiz Felipe Neris Cardoso</font></b></div>
<div><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)"><font color="#c0c0c0">Departamento de Meteorologia - Instituto de Geociências<br>Centro de Ciências Matemáticas e da Natureza - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro<br><br></font></span></div>
<div><div></div><div></div><div> </div></div></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:00 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wrf-users-request@ucar.edu" target="_blank">wrf-users-request@ucar.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Send Wrf-users mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:wrf-users@ucar.edu">wrf-users@ucar.edu</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users" target="_blank">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:wrf-users-request@ucar.edu">wrf-users-request@ucar.edu</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:wrf-users-owner@ucar.edu">wrf-users-owner@ucar.edu</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of Wrf-users digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: WRFDA Errors over Water (Valerio Capecchi)<br>
2. Fwd: WRF_run (Lia Pervin)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:53:41 +0200<br>
From: Valerio Capecchi <<a href="mailto:capecchi@lamma.rete.toscana.it">capecchi@lamma.rete.toscana.it</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [Wrf-users] WRFDA Errors over Water<br>
To: <a href="mailto:wrf-users@ucar.edu">wrf-users@ucar.edu</a><br>
Cc: messeri <<a href="mailto:messeri@lamma.rete.toscana.it">messeri@lamma.rete.toscana.it</a>><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CAAB9Paj=<a href="mailto:bX-WUUoSRggVduFw3hSv3Pzb76YV6SrsATcwy9QFMg@mail.gmail.com">bX-WUUoSRggVduFw3hSv3Pzb76YV6SrsATcwy9QFMg@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
Dear wrf-users,<br>
we're attempting to assimilate both conventional observations<br>
(METAR/SYNOP/RAOB) and observed surface data (2 m temperature and 10 m<br>
wind) with sensors on board of commercial ships in the Mediterranean area.<br>
We want to evaluate the impact of ships derived data in an OSSE (Observing<br>
System Simulation Experiments) framework, where the horizontal resolution<br>
of the "virtual" truth is 1 km and the resolution of the numerical<br>
experiments is 3 km.<br>
<br>
Using a custom background error (with method NMC) we have the following<br>
issue:<br>
in the interface between sea and land we observe an anomalous heating of<br>
the land near the harbors where the ships record the data.<br>
Clearly these data affect improperly the assimilation.<br>
<br>
Is anybody facing the same problem?<br>
Thanks, Valerio<br>
PS: WRF and WRFDA version is 3.5<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 13 February 2012 16:55, Sean Crowell <<a href="mailto:sean.crowell@noaa.gov">sean.crowell@noaa.gov</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi, I am running WRF and WRFDA version 3.3.1 for an OSSE and I am<br>
> getting some pretty large errors over bodies of water. The inclusion<br>
> of surface obs improves the analysis almost everywhere else (over a<br>
> control run with no assimilation). Are there any water specific<br>
> settings in the WRFDA process? I have the line "iswater = 16" in my<br>
> namelist for updating the lower boundary condition file, and in my WRF<br>
> namelist, I haven't changed the land use to MODIS, so far as I can tell.<br>
><br>
> Is there any other obvious reason why the assimilation would degrade<br>
> the solution over bodies of water?<br>
><br>
> Sean Crowell<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Wrf-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Wrf-users@ucar.edu">Wrf-users@ucar.edu</a><br>
> <a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users" target="_blank">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Valerio Capecchi<br>
La.M.M.A.<br>
Area CNR - Via Madonna del Piano 10<br>
Sesto Fiorentino - Firenze - Italia<br>
Maps: 43.818948 N, 11.201912 E<br>
Tel: <a href="tel:%2B39%20055%204483%20066" value="+390554483066">+39 055 4483 066</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140403/ff68e3ca/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140403/ff68e3ca/attachment-0001.html</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:26:23 -0600<br>
From: Lia Pervin <<a href="mailto:plia@ualberta.ca">plia@ualberta.ca</a>><br>
Subject: [Wrf-users] Fwd: WRF_run<br>
To: <a href="mailto:wrf-users@ucar.edu">wrf-users@ucar.edu</a><br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:CAFWbOk0O2sk8MUU%2BCUMTc6b8XAcRTaaAVQKt2SvT6_%2BOgXy04w@mail.gmail.com">CAFWbOk0O2sk8MUU+CUMTc6b8XAcRTaaAVQKt2SvT6_+OgXy04w@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<br>
<br>
---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>
From: Lia Pervin <<a href="mailto:plia@ualberta.ca">plia@ualberta.ca</a>><br>
Date: Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM<br>
Subject: WRF_run<br>
To: Chun-Chao Kuo <<a href="mailto:chunchao@ualberta.ca">chunchao@ualberta.ca</a>><br>
<br>
<br>
Dear Sir,<br>
<br>
Good morning! I have run *JAN00* case and *Katrina*, but *JAN00* giving the<br>
following message for ./real.exe<br>
"Domain 1: Current date being processed: 2000-01-24_12:00:00.0000, which<br>
is loop # 1 out of 5<br>
configflags%julyr, %julday, %gmt: 2000 24 12.0000000<br>
-------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------<br>
FATAL CALLED FROM FILE: <stdin> LINE: 404<br>
error opening met_em.d01.2000-01-24_12:00:<a href="http://00.nc" target="_blank">00.nc</a> for input; bad date in<br>
namelist or file not in directory"<br>
<br>
For ./wrf.exe the message is "FATAL CALLED FROM FILE: <stdin> LINE:<br>
70<br>
program wrf: error opening wrfinput_d01 for reading ierr= -1021<br>
-------------------------------------------<br>
-------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------<br>
FATAL CALLED FROM FILE: <stdin> LINE: 70'.<br>
<br>
Similar message for *Katrina* too. I would appreciate if you could help me<br>
in this regards.<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Lia<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140403/1301f009/attachment-0001.html" target="_blank">http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140403/1301f009/attachment-0001.html</a><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Wrf-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wrf-users@ucar.edu">Wrf-users@ucar.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users" target="_blank">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of Wrf-users Digest, Vol 116, Issue 3<br>
*****************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>