[Wrf-users] machine to run WRF

Juan Jose Amides Figueroa Urbano juanjosefigueroa at gmail.com
Tue Jan 14 12:26:22 MST 2014


As Abdullah KAHRAMAN says its depend of what you need but in general
aspects the number and speed of the cores is very important overall in
resolution times, in this link: http://bit.ly/1dtl76F you found a simple
benchmark made for me for a i5 core pc with 8GB of RAM and 500 GB in HDD,
is in spanish but in Chile read spanish.

Se ya later!



jn 3:16



On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:00 PM, <wrf-users-request at ucar.edu> wrote:

> Send Wrf-users mailing list submissions to
>         wrf-users at ucar.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         wrf-users-owner at ucar.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wrf-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: machine to run WRF (Abdullah Kahraman)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:45:15 -0500
> From: Abdullah Kahraman <havadurumu at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Wrf-users] machine to run WRF
> Cc: "wrf-users at ucar.edu" <wrf-users at ucar.edu>
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CABmnfRLjr4gY-K40_o2m4UDq-_aNwZuou_HzEcBRfCHthEmbUQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Theoretically, a faster HDD would help with writing output. But if the
> history intervals you'll use are not extremely tight (i.e. in order of
> minutes or seconds), I don't think that effects the performance of WRF very
> much. However, not much for running the model, but during postprocessing, a
> faster reading can become quite important.
>
> RAM size would be crucial depending on your domain size (in terms of dx, dy
> and number of vertical levels). I guess a wiser choice would be increasing
> ram, if you are dealing with very large domains, rather than HDD. The RAM
> transfer rate (and that of mainboard) should be high as well, since maybe
> almost all performance depends on the CPU, RAM and the transfers between
> them.
>
> If there is no problem with the domain sizes or excessive postprocessing, I
> would improve the CPUs instead of any other hardware components. But maybe
> searching for benchmarks online would help better with your decision.
>
>
> *Abdullah KAHRAMAN*
> Visiting Research Scholar
> Department of Meteorology
> Pennsylvania State University
> 410 Walker Building
> University Park, PA 16802
> *Meteogreen: http://web.itu.edu.tr/kahramanab/index.php
> <http://web.itu.edu.tr/kahramanab/index.php>*
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Julio Castro <julio.castro at arcadis.cl
> >wrote:
>
> >  Hi all,
> >
> >
> >
> > We are getting a dedicated machine to run WRF. 32 GB RAM and 2 *Intel
> > Xeon E5-2450 2.10GHz, 20M Cache (8 cores each) * with some  *7.2K RPM
> > SATA 3Gbps HDs, my question is if there is any point in getting faster
> HD,
> > say 10 K or 15K RPM instead of the 7.2K RPM?*
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *Julio Castro M.* | Especialista Senior en Calidad de Aire |
> > julio.castro at arcadis.cl
> >
> > ARCADIS Chile | Antonio Varas #621| Providencia
> >
> > CP 7500655 | Santiago | Chile
> >
> > T. + 56 2 2 3816248 | F. + 56 2 2 3816001
> >
> > www.arcadis.cl
> >
> >
> >
> > ARCADIS, Imagine the result
> >
> > *Antes de imprimir este correo piense bien si es necesario. ARCADIS por
> un
> > mundo sustentable.*
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > Este correo electr?nico es confidencial. Est? destinado para su uso s?lo
> > por parte del destinatario.
> > Si usted no es el destinatario previsto, le solicitamos notificarlo al
> > emisor y borrar este correo electr?nico, y cualquier otro adjunto(s), sin
> > copiarlo, reenviarlo, divulgarlo o usarlo de cualquier otra forma.
> >
> > This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. It is intended
> for
> > use by the addressee only.
> > If you are not the intended addressee, we request that you notify us
> > immediately and delete this e-mail, and any attachment(s), without
> copying,
> > forwarding, disclosing or using it in any other way.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wrf-users mailing list
> > Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> > http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140114/af5007d5/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wrf-users mailing list
> Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>
>
> End of Wrf-users Digest, Vol 113, Issue 12
> ******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140114/58c9a57e/attachment.html 


More information about the Wrf-users mailing list