[Wrf-users] Re: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 10
Erik Noble
nobleeu at gmail.com
Thu Aug 30 11:50:44 MDT 2007
Hi Luke,
This topic is extensively discussed at this link
http://tornado.meso.com/wrf_forum/index.php?showtopic=1054
Also, If you are using your own registered version of Ifort, Intel's Premier
Support staff know of WRF and have experience with installing WRFV2 and WPS
on an Intel Mac. Contact them with "WRF model" in your subject line.
-Erik
On 8/30/07 2:00 PM, "wrf-users-request at ucar.edu"
<wrf-users-request at ucar.edu> wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:30:29 -0700
> From: "Lukas C. Valin" <lukevalin at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Wrf-users] WPS Configure Script Issue
> To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
> Message-ID: <46D60195.3090504 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi all,
>
> For some reason, when I type ./configure, I am getting six options
>
> 1. PC Linux x86_64 (IA64 and Opteron), PGI compiler 5.2 or higher,
> serial, NO GRIB2
> 2. PC Linux x86_64 (IA64 and Opteron), PGI compiler 5.2 or higher, serial
> 3. PC Linux x86_64 (IA64 and Opteron), PGI compiler 5.2 or higher, DM
> parallel, NO GRIB2
> 4. PC Linux x86_64 (IA64 and Opteron), PGI compiler 5.2 or higher, DM
> parallel 5. PC Linux x86_64 (IA64 and Opteron), PathScale compiler 2.1
> or higher, serial, NO GRIB2
> 6. PC Linux x86_64 (IA64 and Opteron), PathScale compiler 2.1 or higher,
> DM parallel, NO GRIB2
>
>
> Unfortunately, i don't have those compilers, but am rather working with
> ifort 9.1.045 . compiling WRF worked fine, any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> --LCV
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list