[ncl-talk] P-values

[Arka Banerjee]

Thanks!  But in my case I have made it in spatial..so both points are
there..

On Nov 23, 2017 9:36 PM, "Dennis Shea" <shea at ucar.edu> wrote:

> This is a statistics question not really an NCL question.
>
> A small *p*-*value* (typically ≤ 0.05) indicates strong evidence against
> the null hypothesis, so you reject the null hypothesis.
> ====
> re: " ...a high p-value(say from 0.2-0.75) then what we can say about that
> spatial plot?"
>
> I would say, you can not reject the null hypothesis.
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Arka Banerjee <arka354deb at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear NCL user,
>>
>> If we are using two independent platforms for rainfall estimates over the
>> same location and statistical P-value test give you the spatial signature
>> of rainfall zone with a high p-value(say from 0.2-0.75) then what we can
>> say about that spatial plot?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ncl-talk mailing list
>> ncl-talk at ucar.edu
>> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20171123/aa0daf02/attachment.html>