[ncl-talk] calculating EP flux from JRA55
Sitan Heyl
heylsitan at gmail.com
Wed Nov 30 23:20:04 MST 2016
Hi, All
I am calculating the ep flux using NCL function and get a reasonable
result from NCEP data. But when I calculate the ep flux from Japanese
55-years Reanalysis, the result is so ridiculous. so I compare the ep flux
on 2008/08/01 from two datasets. I found the Fp in JRA is much more than
that in NCEP and I think this is the wrong place. So I wonder is there any
notice needed when using epflux function? can it be used on the other
dataset beside NCEP?
Bests,
Yongli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20161201/ebd2569a/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: compare.ncl
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3498 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20161201/ebd2569a/attachment-0002.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: compare_jra.eps
Type: application/postscript
Size: 728310 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20161201/ebd2569a/attachment-0002.eps
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: compare_jra.ncl
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3536 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20161201/ebd2569a/attachment-0003.obj
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: compare_ncep.eps
Type: application/postscript
Size: 301219 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20161201/ebd2569a/attachment-0003.eps
More information about the ncl-talk
mailing list