[ncl-talk] serious bugs of fourier_info in NCL v.6.2.0

[Dennis Shea]

Just sending these figures would indicate an issue. However, it does not
help in finding the source.
Checking the history of functions ...
   http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/prev_releases.shtml

This does not indicate that any explicit change has occurred in
'fourier_info' since its introduction.

Are the number of  values odd or even ...
Really, nothing can be done without more information.

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Thomas Tobian <thomastobian at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear NCL developer,
>
> I found serious bugs for the fourier_info function in NCL v.6.2.0,
> Attached, please find an example to illustrate it:
> The first two rows are the amplitude of ozone wave1 based on NCL. v. 6.1.2
> and the 3rd-4th rows are computed based on NCL v.6.2.0? The results from
> v.6.2 seems to be not realistic and incorrect.. Could you please find the
> source of the errors? This case also applies for the phase and explained
> variance results.
>
> Thanks
> Thomas Tobian
>
> _______________________________________________
> ncl-talk mailing list
> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20150302/4112bd5b/attachment.html