[Met_help] [rt.rap.ucar.edu #95452] History for CEILING in METplus verification
John Halley Gotway via RT
met_help at ucar.edu
Fri Jun 19 12:41:53 MDT 2020
----------------------------------------------------------------
Initial Request
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi, all,
I just noticed that CEILING is not coming out as a verification variable
for my METplus runs. I thought that I had verified ceiling previously, but
perhaps that is not the case, as I'm not finding it.
Here is how I have it set in METplus:
PB2NC_OBS_BUFR_VAR_LIST = PMO, ZOB, TOB, TDO, QOB, UOB, VOB, PWO, TOCC,
D_RH, HOVI, CEILING, D_PBL, D_CAPE, MXGS
FCST_VAR10_NAME = HGT
FCST_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
FCST_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
FCST_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
OBS_VAR10_NAME = CEILING
OBS_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
OBS_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
What might I be missing here?
Thanks!
Perry
----------------------------------------------------------------
Complete Ticket History
----------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: CEILING in METplus verification
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Mon Jun 01 22:20:54 2020
Hi Perry,
I see you have a question about your METplus configuration since
CEILING
isn't showing up in the output. I don't see any obvious culprits in
the
details you sent.
However, I don't think the "OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS" setting will have any
effect... at least when running Point-Stat. Point-Stat should just be
looking for observations named "CEILING" with no regard to the
GRIB_lvl_typ. I don't think that should affect the results, but I
suppose
it's possible.
Whenever I get 0 matched pairs from Point-Stat, I always go rerun
using
verbosity level 3 and then inspect the log messages to tell me WHY I
got 0
matches. So that's what I'd recommend doing here. If it's easiest to
rerun
the case through METplus, you could reset the MET logging level using:
* LOG_POINT_STAT_VERBOSITY = 3*
Let me know how it goes. If you'd like me to inspect any of your logs
on
WCOSS, please let me know where.
Thanks, John
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:45 PM perry.shafran at noaa.gov via RT <
met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
> Mon Jun 01 14:45:41 2020: Request 95452 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> Queue: met_help
> Subject: CEILING in METplus verification
> Owner: Nobody
> Requestors: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> Status: new
> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=95452 >
>
>
> Hi, all,
>
> I just noticed that CEILING is not coming out as a verification
variable
> for my METplus runs. I thought that I had verified ceiling
previously, but
> perhaps that is not the case, as I'm not finding it.
>
> Here is how I have it set in METplus:
>
> PB2NC_OBS_BUFR_VAR_LIST = PMO, ZOB, TOB, TDO, QOB, UOB, VOB, PWO,
TOCC,
> D_RH, HOVI, CEILING, D_PBL, D_CAPE, MXGS
>
> FCST_VAR10_NAME = HGT
> FCST_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
> FCST_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
> FCST_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
> OBS_VAR10_NAME = CEILING
> OBS_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
> OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
> OBS_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
>
> What might I be missing here?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Perry
>
>
------------------------------------------------
Subject: CEILING in METplus verification
From: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
Time: Tue Jun 02 06:10:05 2020
Hi, John,
It could be possible that PB2NC is not processing it? I am pretty
sure
that you helped me with ceiling some time ago and it ended with a
successful processing of ceiling.
I will go ahead and set the verbosity level. Right now I
have LOG_MET_VERBOSITY = 4, so perhaps that information is already
there?
I'll go double check to see if it says anything about ceiling.
Thanks!
Perry
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:21 AM John Halley Gotway via RT
<met_help at ucar.edu>
wrote:
> Hi Perry,
>
> I see you have a question about your METplus configuration since
CEILING
> isn't showing up in the output. I don't see any obvious culprits in
the
> details you sent.
>
> However, I don't think the "OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS" setting will have any
> effect... at least when running Point-Stat. Point-Stat should just
be
> looking for observations named "CEILING" with no regard to the
> GRIB_lvl_typ. I don't think that should affect the results, but I
suppose
> it's possible.
>
> Whenever I get 0 matched pairs from Point-Stat, I always go rerun
using
> verbosity level 3 and then inspect the log messages to tell me WHY I
got 0
> matches. So that's what I'd recommend doing here. If it's easiest
to rerun
> the case through METplus, you could reset the MET logging level
using:
> * LOG_POINT_STAT_VERBOSITY = 3*
>
> Let me know how it goes. If you'd like me to inspect any of your
logs on
> WCOSS, please let me know where.
>
> Thanks, John
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:45 PM perry.shafran at noaa.gov via RT <
> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> > Mon Jun 01 14:45:41 2020: Request 95452 was acted upon.
> > Transaction: Ticket created by perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> > Queue: met_help
> > Subject: CEILING in METplus verification
> > Owner: Nobody
> > Requestors: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> > Status: new
> > Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=95452 >
> >
> >
> > Hi, all,
> >
> > I just noticed that CEILING is not coming out as a verification
variable
> > for my METplus runs. I thought that I had verified ceiling
previously,
> but
> > perhaps that is not the case, as I'm not finding it.
> >
> > Here is how I have it set in METplus:
> >
> > PB2NC_OBS_BUFR_VAR_LIST = PMO, ZOB, TOB, TDO, QOB, UOB, VOB, PWO,
TOCC,
> > D_RH, HOVI, CEILING, D_PBL, D_CAPE, MXGS
> >
> > FCST_VAR10_NAME = HGT
> > FCST_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
> > FCST_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
> > FCST_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
> > OBS_VAR10_NAME = CEILING
> > OBS_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
> > OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
> > OBS_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
> >
> > What might I be missing here?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Perry
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------------------------
Subject: CEILING in METplus verification
From: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
Time: Tue Jun 02 06:39:01 2020
Hi, John,
My mistake - METplus is calculating the stats for ceiling just fine.
Just
in the particular model that I was looking at, there was no ceiling
output,
so I looked at a different model and the ceiling was there.
You may close this ticket.
Thanks!
Perry
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 8:09 AM Perry Shafran - NOAA Affiliate <
perry.shafran at noaa.gov> wrote:
> Hi, John,
>
> It could be possible that PB2NC is not processing it? I am pretty
sure
> that you helped me with ceiling some time ago and it ended with a
> successful processing of ceiling.
>
> I will go ahead and set the verbosity level. Right now I
> have LOG_MET_VERBOSITY = 4, so perhaps that information is already
there?
> I'll go double check to see if it says anything about ceiling.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Perry
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:21 AM John Halley Gotway via RT <
> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Perry,
>>
>> I see you have a question about your METplus configuration since
CEILING
>> isn't showing up in the output. I don't see any obvious culprits in
the
>> details you sent.
>>
>> However, I don't think the "OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS" setting will have
any
>> effect... at least when running Point-Stat. Point-Stat should just
be
>> looking for observations named "CEILING" with no regard to the
>> GRIB_lvl_typ. I don't think that should affect the results, but I
suppose
>> it's possible.
>>
>> Whenever I get 0 matched pairs from Point-Stat, I always go rerun
using
>> verbosity level 3 and then inspect the log messages to tell me WHY
I got 0
>> matches. So that's what I'd recommend doing here. If it's easiest
to
>> rerun
>> the case through METplus, you could reset the MET logging level
using:
>> * LOG_POINT_STAT_VERBOSITY = 3*
>>
>> Let me know how it goes. If you'd like me to inspect any of your
logs on
>> WCOSS, please let me know where.
>>
>> Thanks, John
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:45 PM perry.shafran at noaa.gov via RT <
>> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Mon Jun 01 14:45:41 2020: Request 95452 was acted upon.
>> > Transaction: Ticket created by perry.shafran at noaa.gov
>> > Queue: met_help
>> > Subject: CEILING in METplus verification
>> > Owner: Nobody
>> > Requestors: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
>> > Status: new
>> > Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=95452 >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi, all,
>> >
>> > I just noticed that CEILING is not coming out as a verification
variable
>> > for my METplus runs. I thought that I had verified ceiling
previously,
>> but
>> > perhaps that is not the case, as I'm not finding it.
>> >
>> > Here is how I have it set in METplus:
>> >
>> > PB2NC_OBS_BUFR_VAR_LIST = PMO, ZOB, TOB, TDO, QOB, UOB, VOB, PWO,
TOCC,
>> > D_RH, HOVI, CEILING, D_PBL, D_CAPE, MXGS
>> >
>> > FCST_VAR10_NAME = HGT
>> > FCST_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
>> > FCST_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
>> > FCST_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
>> > OBS_VAR10_NAME = CEILING
>> > OBS_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
>> > OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
>> > OBS_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
>> >
>> > What might I be missing here?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > Perry
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------
Subject: CEILING in METplus verification
From: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
Time: Tue Jun 02 06:50:27 2020
I think I got concerned when I could not find ceiling in METviewer,
but I
think that the issue is that the problem is that it's really described
as
HGT in the grib file. Thus I added a description to the METplus that
looks
like this:
FCST_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215; desc = "CEILING";
This should work, right?
Thanks!
Perry
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 8:38 AM Perry Shafran - NOAA Affiliate <
perry.shafran at noaa.gov> wrote:
> Hi, John,
>
> My mistake - METplus is calculating the stats for ceiling just fine.
Just
> in the particular model that I was looking at, there was no ceiling
output,
> so I looked at a different model and the ceiling was there.
>
> You may close this ticket.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Perry
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 8:09 AM Perry Shafran - NOAA Affiliate <
> perry.shafran at noaa.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hi, John,
>>
>> It could be possible that PB2NC is not processing it? I am pretty
sure
>> that you helped me with ceiling some time ago and it ended with a
>> successful processing of ceiling.
>>
>> I will go ahead and set the verbosity level. Right now I
>> have LOG_MET_VERBOSITY = 4, so perhaps that information is already
there?
>> I'll go double check to see if it says anything about ceiling.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Perry
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:21 AM John Halley Gotway via RT <
>> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Perry,
>>>
>>> I see you have a question about your METplus configuration since
CEILING
>>> isn't showing up in the output. I don't see any obvious culprits
in the
>>> details you sent.
>>>
>>> However, I don't think the "OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS" setting will have
any
>>> effect... at least when running Point-Stat. Point-Stat should just
be
>>> looking for observations named "CEILING" with no regard to the
>>> GRIB_lvl_typ. I don't think that should affect the results, but I
suppose
>>> it's possible.
>>>
>>> Whenever I get 0 matched pairs from Point-Stat, I always go rerun
using
>>> verbosity level 3 and then inspect the log messages to tell me WHY
I got
>>> 0
>>> matches. So that's what I'd recommend doing here. If it's easiest
to
>>> rerun
>>> the case through METplus, you could reset the MET logging level
using:
>>> * LOG_POINT_STAT_VERBOSITY = 3*
>>>
>>> Let me know how it goes. If you'd like me to inspect any of your
logs on
>>> WCOSS, please let me know where.
>>>
>>> Thanks, John
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:45 PM perry.shafran at noaa.gov via RT <
>>> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Mon Jun 01 14:45:41 2020: Request 95452 was acted upon.
>>> > Transaction: Ticket created by perry.shafran at noaa.gov
>>> > Queue: met_help
>>> > Subject: CEILING in METplus verification
>>> > Owner: Nobody
>>> > Requestors: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
>>> > Status: new
>>> > Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=95452
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hi, all,
>>> >
>>> > I just noticed that CEILING is not coming out as a verification
>>> variable
>>> > for my METplus runs. I thought that I had verified ceiling
>>> previously, but
>>> > perhaps that is not the case, as I'm not finding it.
>>> >
>>> > Here is how I have it set in METplus:
>>> >
>>> > PB2NC_OBS_BUFR_VAR_LIST = PMO, ZOB, TOB, TDO, QOB, UOB, VOB,
PWO, TOCC,
>>> > D_RH, HOVI, CEILING, D_PBL, D_CAPE, MXGS
>>> >
>>> > FCST_VAR10_NAME = HGT
>>> > FCST_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
>>> > FCST_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
>>> > FCST_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
>>> > OBS_VAR10_NAME = CEILING
>>> > OBS_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
>>> > OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
>>> > OBS_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
>>> >
>>> > What might I be missing here?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > Perry
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
------------------------------------------------
Subject: CEILING in METplus verification
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Tue Jun 02 09:36:45 2020
Perry,
Great, thanks for confirming.
John
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 6:50 AM perry.shafran at noaa.gov via RT <
met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
> <URL: https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=95452 >
>
> I think I got concerned when I could not find ceiling in METviewer,
but I
> think that the issue is that the problem is that it's really
described as
> HGT in the grib file. Thus I added a description to the METplus
that looks
> like this:
>
> FCST_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215; desc = "CEILING";
>
> This should work, right?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Perry
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 8:38 AM Perry Shafran - NOAA Affiliate <
> perry.shafran at noaa.gov> wrote:
>
> > Hi, John,
> >
> > My mistake - METplus is calculating the stats for ceiling just
fine.
> Just
> > in the particular model that I was looking at, there was no
ceiling
> output,
> > so I looked at a different model and the ceiling was there.
> >
> > You may close this ticket.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Perry
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 8:09 AM Perry Shafran - NOAA Affiliate <
> > perry.shafran at noaa.gov> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, John,
> >>
> >> It could be possible that PB2NC is not processing it? I am
pretty sure
> >> that you helped me with ceiling some time ago and it ended with a
> >> successful processing of ceiling.
> >>
> >> I will go ahead and set the verbosity level. Right now I
> >> have LOG_MET_VERBOSITY = 4, so perhaps that information is
already
> there?
> >> I'll go double check to see if it says anything about ceiling.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> Perry
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:21 AM John Halley Gotway via RT <
> >> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Perry,
> >>>
> >>> I see you have a question about your METplus configuration since
> CEILING
> >>> isn't showing up in the output. I don't see any obvious culprits
in the
> >>> details you sent.
> >>>
> >>> However, I don't think the "OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS" setting will have
any
> >>> effect... at least when running Point-Stat. Point-Stat should
just be
> >>> looking for observations named "CEILING" with no regard to the
> >>> GRIB_lvl_typ. I don't think that should affect the results, but
I
> suppose
> >>> it's possible.
> >>>
> >>> Whenever I get 0 matched pairs from Point-Stat, I always go
rerun using
> >>> verbosity level 3 and then inspect the log messages to tell me
WHY I
> got
> >>> 0
> >>> matches. So that's what I'd recommend doing here. If it's
easiest to
> >>> rerun
> >>> the case through METplus, you could reset the MET logging level
using:
> >>> * LOG_POINT_STAT_VERBOSITY = 3*
> >>>
> >>> Let me know how it goes. If you'd like me to inspect any of your
logs
> on
> >>> WCOSS, please let me know where.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, John
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:45 PM perry.shafran at noaa.gov via RT <
> >>> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > Mon Jun 01 14:45:41 2020: Request 95452 was acted upon.
> >>> > Transaction: Ticket created by perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> >>> > Queue: met_help
> >>> > Subject: CEILING in METplus verification
> >>> > Owner: Nobody
> >>> > Requestors: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> >>> > Status: new
> >>> > Ticket <URL:
> https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=95452
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Hi, all,
> >>> >
> >>> > I just noticed that CEILING is not coming out as a
verification
> >>> variable
> >>> > for my METplus runs. I thought that I had verified ceiling
> >>> previously, but
> >>> > perhaps that is not the case, as I'm not finding it.
> >>> >
> >>> > Here is how I have it set in METplus:
> >>> >
> >>> > PB2NC_OBS_BUFR_VAR_LIST = PMO, ZOB, TOB, TDO, QOB, UOB, VOB,
PWO,
> TOCC,
> >>> > D_RH, HOVI, CEILING, D_PBL, D_CAPE, MXGS
> >>> >
> >>> > FCST_VAR10_NAME = HGT
> >>> > FCST_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
> >>> > FCST_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
> >>> > FCST_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
> >>> > OBS_VAR10_NAME = CEILING
> >>> > OBS_VAR10_LEVELS = L0
> >>> > OBS_VAR10_OPTIONS = GRIB_lvl_typ = 215;
> >>> > OBS_VAR10_THRESH = <152, <305, <914, <1520, <3040, >=914
> >>> >
> >>> > What might I be missing here?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks!
> >>> >
> >>> > Perry
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
------------------------------------------------
More information about the Met_help
mailing list