[Met_help] [rt.rap.ucar.edu #80470] History for concatenating .stat files

[John Halley Gotway via RT]

----------------------------------------------------------------
  Initial Request
----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi, there,

Quick question regarding .stat files that come out of MET.  Now with VSDB
we usually concatenate each file for each hourly cycle into a daily file
(verification time) that we used for FVS and also for METViewer.  I am
assuming that if we concatenate .stat files into one daily file containing
all hours of verification that METViewer will have no problem recognizing
the statistics?  This is probably a simple question, and I'm assuming the
answer is yes, but I just wanted to verify (it's what I do of course) that
this is OK for .stat files.

Thanks!

Perry


----------------------------------------------------------------
  Complete Ticket History
----------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: concatenating .stat files
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Tue May 16 09:28:23 2017

Perry (and Tatiana),

The only potential problem caused by concatenating multiple .stat
files
together would be effectively inserting header rows into the middle of
the
file.  Presumably, you will be passing this concatenated output to
either
the STAT-Analysis tool or loading it into METViewer.

I ran a little test to be sure... but STAT-Analysis is smart enough to
ignore header lines that appear in the middle of the file.  So that's
not a
problem.

I assume that this wouldn't cause a problem for METViewer either, but
I'm
cc'ing Tatiana on this email for her to verify that.

Thanks,
John

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM, perry.shafran at noaa.gov via RT <
met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:

>
> Tue May 16 09:16:32 2017: Request 80470 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by perry.shafran at noaa.gov
>        Queue: met_help
>      Subject: concatenating .stat files
>        Owner: Nobody
>   Requestors: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
>       Status: new
>  Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=80470 >
>
>
> Hi, there,
>
> Quick question regarding .stat files that come out of MET.  Now with
VSDB
> we usually concatenate each file for each hourly cycle into a daily
file
> (verification time) that we used for FVS and also for METViewer.  I
am
> assuming that if we concatenate .stat files into one daily file
containing
> all hours of verification that METViewer will have no problem
recognizing
> the statistics?  This is probably a simple question, and I'm
assuming the
> answer is yes, but I just wanted to verify (it's what I do of
course) that
> this is OK for .stat files.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Perry
>
>

------------------------------------------------
Subject: concatenating .stat files
From: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
Time: Tue May 16 09:32:21 2017

Hi, John,

Thanks for letting me know.  Otherwise we will have a gigantic library
of
.stat files that I would think would be better organized if they were
in
one file.  If this causes problems then I won't do it.

Thanks!

Perry

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:28 AM, John Halley Gotway via RT <
met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:

> Perry (and Tatiana),
>
> The only potential problem caused by concatenating multiple .stat
files
> together would be effectively inserting header rows into the middle
of the
> file.  Presumably, you will be passing this concatenated output to
either
> the STAT-Analysis tool or loading it into METViewer.
>
> I ran a little test to be sure... but STAT-Analysis is smart enough
to
> ignore header lines that appear in the middle of the file.  So
that's not a
> problem.
>
> I assume that this wouldn't cause a problem for METViewer either,
but I'm
> cc'ing Tatiana on this email for her to verify that.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM, perry.shafran at noaa.gov via RT <
> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> > Tue May 16 09:16:32 2017: Request 80470 was acted upon.
> > Transaction: Ticket created by perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> >        Queue: met_help
> >      Subject: concatenating .stat files
> >        Owner: Nobody
> >   Requestors: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> >       Status: new
> >  Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=80470 >
> >
> >
> > Hi, there,
> >
> > Quick question regarding .stat files that come out of MET.  Now
with VSDB
> > we usually concatenate each file for each hourly cycle into a
daily file
> > (verification time) that we used for FVS and also for METViewer.
I am
> > assuming that if we concatenate .stat files into one daily file
> containing
> > all hours of verification that METViewer will have no problem
recognizing
> > the statistics?  This is probably a simple question, and I'm
assuming the
> > answer is yes, but I just wanted to verify (it's what I do of
course)
> that
> > this is OK for .stat files.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Perry
> >
> >
>
>

------------------------------------------------
Subject: concatenating .stat files
From: Tatiana Burek
Time: Tue May 16 10:56:04 2017

METViewer loading module ignores all  "header" lines in the data file.
So including these lines in a file should not cause any loading
issues.

"header" line  -  a line that is empty or starts with a word
"VERSION".

Tatiana

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:28 AM, John Halley Gotway via RT <
met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:

>
> <URL: https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=80470 >
>
> Perry (and Tatiana),
>
> The only potential problem caused by concatenating multiple .stat
files
> together would be effectively inserting header rows into the middle
of the
> file.  Presumably, you will be passing this concatenated output to
either
> the STAT-Analysis tool or loading it into METViewer.
>
> I ran a little test to be sure... but STAT-Analysis is smart enough
to
> ignore header lines that appear in the middle of the file.  So
that's not a
> problem.
>
> I assume that this wouldn't cause a problem for METViewer either,
but I'm
> cc'ing Tatiana on this email for her to verify that.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM, perry.shafran at noaa.gov via RT <
> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> > Tue May 16 09:16:32 2017: Request 80470 was acted upon.
> > Transaction: Ticket created by perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> >        Queue: met_help
> >      Subject: concatenating .stat files
> >        Owner: Nobody
> >   Requestors: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> >       Status: new
> >  Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=80470 >
> >
> >
> > Hi, there,
> >
> > Quick question regarding .stat files that come out of MET.  Now
with VSDB
> > we usually concatenate each file for each hourly cycle into a
daily file
> > (verification time) that we used for FVS and also for METViewer.
I am
> > assuming that if we concatenate .stat files into one daily file
> containing
> > all hours of verification that METViewer will have no problem
recognizing
> > the statistics?  This is probably a simple question, and I'm
assuming the
> > answer is yes, but I just wanted to verify (it's what I do of
course)
> that
> > this is OK for .stat files.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Perry
> >
> >
>
>

------------------------------------------------
Subject: concatenating .stat files
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Tue May 16 11:29:25 2017

Thanks for clarifying Tatiana.  Perry, I don't think concatenating
will
cause any problems.  I'll go ahead and resolve this ticket.

Thanks,
John

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Tatiana Burek via RT
<met_help at ucar.edu>
wrote:

>
> <URL: https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=80470 >
>
> METViewer loading module ignores all  "header" lines in the data
file.
> So including these lines in a file should not cause any loading
issues.
>
> "header" line  -  a line that is empty or starts with a word
"VERSION".
>
> Tatiana
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:28 AM, John Halley Gotway via RT <
> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> > <URL: https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=80470 >
> >
> > Perry (and Tatiana),
> >
> > The only potential problem caused by concatenating multiple .stat
files
> > together would be effectively inserting header rows into the
middle of
> the
> > file.  Presumably, you will be passing this concatenated output to
either
> > the STAT-Analysis tool or loading it into METViewer.
> >
> > I ran a little test to be sure... but STAT-Analysis is smart
enough to
> > ignore header lines that appear in the middle of the file.  So
that's
> not a
> > problem.
> >
> > I assume that this wouldn't cause a problem for METViewer either,
but I'm
> > cc'ing Tatiana on this email for her to verify that.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
> >
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM, perry.shafran at noaa.gov via RT <
> > met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Tue May 16 09:16:32 2017: Request 80470 was acted upon.
> > > Transaction: Ticket created by perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> > >        Queue: met_help
> > >      Subject: concatenating .stat files
> > >        Owner: Nobody
> > >   Requestors: perry.shafran at noaa.gov
> > >       Status: new
> > >  Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=80470
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi, there,
> > >
> > > Quick question regarding .stat files that come out of MET.  Now
with
> VSDB
> > > we usually concatenate each file for each hourly cycle into a
daily
> file
> > > (verification time) that we used for FVS and also for METViewer.
I am
> > > assuming that if we concatenate .stat files into one daily file
> > containing
> > > all hours of verification that METViewer will have no problem
> recognizing
> > > the statistics?  This is probably a simple question, and I'm
assuming
> the
> > > answer is yes, but I just wanted to verify (it's what I do of
course)
> > that
> > > this is OK for .stat files.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Perry
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

------------------------------------------------