[Met_help] [rt.rap.ucar.edu #79813] History for Approving MET

[John Halley Gotway via RT]

----------------------------------------------------------------
  Initial Request
----------------------------------------------------------------

John, we at 557th weather wing, and I would assume all DOD users, have to get MET scanned and approved for security vulnerabilities before we can run it on our newer computer systems.   The security checks are per new guidance issued by Defense Information System Agency.   Has any other DOD users mentioned this or have you provided any support for this task?  

Thanks
Bob Craig



----------------------------------------------------------------
  Complete Ticket History
----------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Approving MET
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Mon Mar 13 15:07:01 2017

Bob,

That makes sense to me.  While I am aware of some folks at Army
testing
ranges using MET, as well as folks at NCEP, this is the first I've
heard of
DOD security checks.

Please let us know what we can do here to facilitate this process.

Thanks,
John

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:39 PM, robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil via RT <
met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:

>
> Mon Mar 13 14:39:19 2017: Request 79813 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil
>        Queue: met_help
>      Subject: Approving MET
>        Owner: Nobody
>   Requestors: robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil
>       Status: new
>  Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=79813 >
>
>
> John, we at 557th weather wing, and I would assume all DOD users,
have to
> get MET scanned and approved for security vulnerabilities before we
can run
> it on our newer computer systems.   The security checks are per new
> guidance issued by Defense Information System Agency.   Has any
other DOD
> users mentioned this or have you provided any support for this task?
>
> Thanks
> Bob Craig
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #79813] Resolved: Approving MET
From: robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil
Time: Wed Mar 22 10:20:30 2017

I never got anything back on this.

Bob Craig

-----Original Message-----
From: John Halley Gotway via RT [mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:14 AM
To: CRAIG, ROBERT J GS-12 USAF ACC 16 WS/WXN
<robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil>
Subject: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #79813] Resolved: Approving MET

According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you have
any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.


------------------------------------------------
Subject: Approving MET
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Wed Mar 22 10:31:36 2017

Bob... hmm, don't know why I didn't go through.  Here's how I replied
back
on March 13th...

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++==

Bob,

That makes sense to me.  While I am aware of some folks at Army
testing
ranges using MET, as well as folks at NCEP, this is the first I've
heard of
DOD security checks.

Please let us know what we can do here to facilitate this process.

Thanks,
John

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:20 AM, robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil via RT <
met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:

>
> <URL: https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=79813 >
>
> I never got anything back on this.
>
> Bob Craig
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Halley Gotway via RT [mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:14 AM
> To: CRAIG, ROBERT J GS-12 USAF ACC 16 WS/WXN
<robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil>
> Subject: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #79813] Resolved: Approving MET
>
> According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you
have any
> further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------
Subject: Approving MET
From: robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil
Time: Wed Mar 22 10:46:10 2017

John, I thought I sent this last Friday but now I am not so sure so I
will
resend.

John, As I mentioned earlier, we (all DOD users) have to approve
software
that is run on our systems (new requirement).   To accomplish this we
had to
scan the code for vulnerabilities and fill out a checklist.  There
were many
questions on the checklist and many related to software that has users
log
into, ran as a service on a system, or ran in a web exposed
application like
internet explorer.  All questions pertaining to that we said are not
applicable.  There were some questions we were either uncertain about
or
didn't know the answer and those are attached.  Please review the list
and
the answers in red and see if you agree or answer them properly.  View
in
HTML.

Thanks
Bob



-----Original Message-----
From: John Halley Gotway via RT [mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:32 AM
To: CRAIG, ROBERT J GS-12 USAF ACC 16 WS/WXN
<robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil>
Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #79813] Resolved: Approving MET

Bob... hmm, don't know why I didn't go through.  Here's how I replied
back on
March 13th...

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++==

Bob,

That makes sense to me.  While I am aware of some folks at Army
testing ranges
using MET, as well as folks at NCEP, this is the first I've heard of
DOD
security checks.

Please let us know what we can do here to facilitate this process.

Thanks,
John

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:20 AM, robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil via RT <
met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:

>
> <URL: https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=79813 >
>
> I never got anything back on this.
>
> Bob Craig
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Halley Gotway via RT [mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:14 AM
> To: CRAIG, ROBERT J GS-12 USAF ACC 16 WS/WXN
> <robert.craig.2 at us.af.mil>
> Subject: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #79813] Resolved: Approving MET
>
> According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you
have
> any further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.
>
>
>


------------------------------------------------