[Met_help] [rt.rap.ucar.edu #56387] History for problems compiling METv3.1: linking libm

[Paul Oldenburg via RT]

----------------------------------------------------------------
  Initial Request
----------------------------------------------------------------

Hello

I was trying to compile MET v3.1 and I have problems because the linker ask
for libm.a and I have Fedora 11 from an .rpm instalation and it has only
the libm.so library.

Like I made  WRF-ARW and other models on operational basis, I'm not able to
update the SO right now.

I would like to know if there is any hint to solve this problem

Thank you very much for your help, best regards

Estela


----------------------------------------------------------------
  Complete Ticket History
----------------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #56387] problems compiling METv3.1: linking libm
From: Paul Oldenburg
Time: Fri May 11 08:10:19 2012

Estela,

If you want to link against shared libraries when building MET, you
should remove or comment out the -static flag from
the CXX_FLAGS setting in your user_defs.mk file:

   CXX_FLAGS    = -Wall -Wshadow  # -static -g

If you have any other trouble compiling MET, please send me your
user_defs.mk file and a log of the compiler output,
which you can capture using the following commands:

   make >& make_met.log&
   tail -f make_met.log

Thanks,

Paul


On 05/10/2012 05:02 PM, Estela COLLINI via RT wrote:
>
> Thu May 10 17:02:46 2012: Request 56387 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by estela.collini at gmail.com
>         Queue: met_help
>       Subject: problems compiling METv3.1: linking libm
>         Owner: Nobody
>    Requestors: estela.collini at gmail.com
>        Status: new
>   Ticket<URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=56387>
>
>
> Hello
>
> I was trying to compile MET v3.1 and I have problems because the
linker ask
> for libm.a and I have Fedora 11 from an .rpm instalation and it has
only
> the libm.so library.
>
> Like I made  WRF-ARW and other models on operational basis, I'm not
able to
> update the SO right now.
>
> I would like to know if there is any hint to solve this problem
>
> Thank you very much for your help, best regards
>
> Estela


------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #56387] problems compiling METv3.1: linking libm
From: Paul Oldenburg
Time: Fri May 11 08:12:15 2012

Estella,

I see that you're not currently a registered user of the MET software.
In order to provide direct support in the use of
MET, we require that users fill out the free online registration form.
That enables us to ensure that we remain in
compliance with the international export laws of the United States.

To fill out the registration, just go here:
    http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/downloads/index.php
Enter you email address and hit enter to be taken to the form.

Thanks,

Paul


On 05/10/2012 05:02 PM, Estela COLLINI via RT wrote:
>
> Thu May 10 17:02:46 2012: Request 56387 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by estela.collini at gmail.com
>         Queue: met_help
>       Subject: problems compiling METv3.1: linking libm
>         Owner: Nobody
>    Requestors: estela.collini at gmail.com
>        Status: new
>   Ticket<URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=56387>
>
>
> Hello
>
> I was trying to compile MET v3.1 and I have problems because the
linker ask
> for libm.a and I have Fedora 11 from an .rpm instalation and it has
only
> the libm.so library.
>
> Like I made  WRF-ARW and other models on operational basis, I'm not
able to
> update the SO right now.
>
> I would like to know if there is any hint to solve this problem
>
> Thank you very much for your help, best regards
>
> Estela


------------------------------------------------
Subject: problems compiling METv3.1: linking libm
From: Estela COLLINI
Time: Fri May 18 07:10:25 2012

Thanks for your advice, it is working now

Best Regards

Estela

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Paul Oldenburg via RT
<met_help at ucar.edu>wrote:

> According to our records, your request has been resolved. If you
have any
> further questions or concerns, please respond to this message.
>

------------------------------------------------