[Met_help] [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] History for Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
RAL HelpDesk {for John Halley Gotway}
met_help at ucar.edu
Wed Feb 23 14:48:13 MST 2011
----------------------------------------------------------------
Initial Request
----------------------------------------------------------------
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
I have been running Stat-Analysis on Point-Stat results we generated this
past summer. This proceeded well until I started noticing that the output
.txt files on the last couple of runs were 0-sized files which is
unexpected.
I have attached examples of Stat-Analysis log files which show the dialog
before and after. The after file shows a warning about "no matching stat
lines" after having read in and retained 1565906 stat lines.
I checked sample stat lines (.stat files) before and after and note no
obvious differences or problems.
The only change which I'm aware of which occurred between the two cases was
that our new MET V3.0 was compiled on OCT 7.
The processing of the "before" case which occurred on SEP 13 and the
processing for the "after" case on OCT 21.
Can you assist me in troubleshooting this?
Thanks.
R/
John
Mr John W. Raby, Meteorologist
U.S. Army Research Laboratory
White Sands Missile Range, NM 88002
(575) 678-2004 DSN 258-2004
FAX (575) 678-1230 DSN 258-1230
Email: john.raby at us.army.mil
Please begin using the email address within this signature
block for all future correspondence. The current @arl.army.mil
address will be decommissioned in upcoming months.
"When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in numbers,
you know something about it, but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot
express it in number, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory
kind". - Lord Kelvin
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
----------------------------------------------------------------
Complete Ticket History
----------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Thu Oct 28 09:05:51 2010
John,
Sure, we're happy to help. I'm not sure what's going on. The problem
may exist in 1 of two places:
(1) Perhaps something's different about your runs of Point-Stat, and
you Point-Stat output has changed.
(2) Perhaps something's different about the STAT-Analysis job.
Ultimately, I think it'll be easiest if you just send me some sample
data to play with. Please execute the following commands and send me
this test data:
tar -cvzf before.tar.gz
MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_P2/*/point_stat_m1o1_P2_110000L*.stat
tar -cvzf after.tar.gz
MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_T3/*/point_stat_m1o1_T3_110000L*.stat
And then you can follow the instructions here for posting the
"before.tar.gz" and "after.tar.gz" files to our anonymous FTP site:
http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/support/met_help.php#ftp
Please let me know when the data is there, and I'll try to debug it.
John
On 10/27/2010 04:37 PM, RAL HelpDesk {for Raby, John} wrote:
>
> Wed Oct 27 16:37:54 2010: Request 41782 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by john.raby at us.army.mil
> Queue: met_help
> Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
> Owner: Nobody
> Requestors: john.raby at us.army.mil
> Status: new
> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=41782 >
>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> I have been running Stat-Analysis on Point-Stat results we generated
this
> past summer. This proceeded well until I started noticing that the
output
> .txt files on the last couple of runs were 0-sized files which is
> unexpected.
>
> I have attached examples of Stat-Analysis log files which show the
dialog
> before and after. The after file shows a warning about "no matching
stat
> lines" after having read in and retained 1565906 stat lines.
>
> I checked sample stat lines (.stat files) before and after and note
no
> obvious differences or problems.
>
> The only change which I'm aware of which occurred between the two
cases was
> that our new MET V3.0 was compiled on OCT 7.
>
> The processing of the "before" case which occurred on SEP 13 and the
> processing for the "after" case on OCT 21.
>
> Can you assist me in troubleshooting this?
>
> Thanks.
> R/
> John
>
>
> Mr John W. Raby, Meteorologist
> U.S. Army Research Laboratory
> White Sands Missile Range, NM 88002
> (575) 678-2004 DSN 258-2004
> FAX (575) 678-1230 DSN 258-1230
> Email: john.raby at us.army.mil
>
> Please begin using the email address within this signature
> block for all future correspondence. The current @arl.army.mil
> address will be decommissioned in upcoming months.
>
> "When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in
numbers,
> you know something about it, but when you cannot measure it, when
you cannot
> express it in number, your knowledge is of a meagre and
unsatisfactory
> kind". - Lord Kelvin
>
>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------
Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: Raby, John
Time: Thu Oct 28 09:14:41 2010
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Additional information on this problem.
When running Stat-Analysis on upper air data (AIRCFT), I noticed that
some of
the output .txt files contained results (not all were 0-sized). This
is
expected as AIRCFT data is sporadic.
I examined the attached log file and found instances where the 500
.stat files
were being processed (no WARNING) but a statement is output on
completion of
the processing of the 500th stat file which says
"DataLine::get_item(int) ->
range check error"
Further into the processing, there were instances where the same
WARNING
reported earlier occurred.
R/
John
-----Original Message-----
From: RAL HelpDesk {for met_help at ucar.edu} [mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 4:38 PM
To: Raby, John (Civ, ARL/CISD)
Subject: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] AutoReply: Stat-Analysis Warning
Message
(UNCLASSIFIED)
Greetings,
This message has been automatically generated in response to the
creation of a
trouble ticket regarding:
"Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)", a summary of which
appears
below.
There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your ticket has
been
assigned an ID of [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782].
Please include the string:
[rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782]
in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To
do so,
you may reply to this message.
Thank you,
met_help at ucar.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
I have been running Stat-Analysis on Point-Stat results we generated
this past
summer. This proceeded well until I started noticing that the output
.txt
files on the last couple of runs were 0-sized files which is
unexpected.
I have attached examples of Stat-Analysis log files which show the
dialog
before and after. The after file shows a warning about "no matching
stat
lines" after having read in and retained 1565906 stat lines.
I checked sample stat lines (.stat files) before and after and note no
obvious
differences or problems.
The only change which I'm aware of which occurred between the two
cases was
that our new MET V3.0 was compiled on OCT 7.
The processing of the "before" case which occurred on SEP 13 and the
processing for the "after" case on OCT 21.
Can you assist me in troubleshooting this?
Thanks.
R/
John
Mr John W. Raby, Meteorologist
U.S. Army Research Laboratory
White Sands Missile Range, NM 88002
(575) 678-2004 DSN 258-2004
FAX (575) 678-1230 DSN 258-1230
Email: john.raby at us.army.mil
Please begin using the email address within this signature block for
all
future correspondence. The current @arl.army.mil address will be
decommissioned in upcoming months.
"When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in
numbers,
you know something about it, but when you cannot measure it, when you
cannot
express it in number, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory
kind". - Lord Kelvin
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] AutoReply: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Thu Oct 28 09:17:12 2010
John,
Are you sure that you're using the METv2.0 version of STAT-Analysis to
process the METv2.0 Point-Stat output, and using the METv3.0 version
of STAT-Analysis to process the METv3.0 Point-Stat output?
If not, that could cause such a range check error message.
John
On 10/28/2010 09:14 AM, RAL HelpDesk {for Raby, John} wrote:
> Further into the processing, there were instances where the same
WARNING
------------------------------------------------
Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: Raby, John
Time: Thu Oct 28 09:17:35 2010
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
John -
Thanks for your offer of assistance. I will let you know when the data
is
posted.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: RAL HelpDesk {for John Halley Gotway} [mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:06 AM
To: Raby, John (Civ, ARL/CISD)
Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] Stat-Analysis Warning Message
(UNCLASSIFIED)
John,
Sure, we're happy to help. I'm not sure what's going on. The problem
may
exist in 1 of two places:
(1) Perhaps something's different about your runs of Point-Stat, and
you
Point-Stat output has changed.
(2) Perhaps something's different about the STAT-Analysis job.
Ultimately, I think it'll be easiest if you just send me some sample
data to
play with. Please execute the following commands and send me this
test data:
tar -cvzf before.tar.gz
MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_P2/*/point_stat_m1o1_P2_110000L*.stat
tar -cvzf after.tar.gz
MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_T3/*/point_stat_m1o1_T3_110000L*.stat
And then you can follow the instructions here for posting the
"before.tar.gz"
and "after.tar.gz" files to our anonymous FTP site:
http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/support/met_help.php#ftp
Please let me know when the data is there, and I'll try to debug it.
John
On 10/27/2010 04:37 PM, RAL HelpDesk {for Raby, John} wrote:
>
> Wed Oct 27 16:37:54 2010: Request 41782 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by john.raby at us.army.mil
> Queue: met_help
> Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
> Owner: Nobody
> Requestors: john.raby at us.army.mil
> Status: new
> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=41782
> >
>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> I have been running Stat-Analysis on Point-Stat results we generated
> this past summer. This proceeded well until I started noticing that
> the output .txt files on the last couple of runs were 0-sized files
> which is unexpected.
>
> I have attached examples of Stat-Analysis log files which show the
> dialog before and after. The after file shows a warning about "no
> matching stat lines" after having read in and retained 1565906 stat
lines.
>
> I checked sample stat lines (.stat files) before and after and note
no
> obvious differences or problems.
>
> The only change which I'm aware of which occurred between the two
> cases was that our new MET V3.0 was compiled on OCT 7.
>
> The processing of the "before" case which occurred on SEP 13 and the
> processing for the "after" case on OCT 21.
>
> Can you assist me in troubleshooting this?
>
> Thanks.
> R/
> John
>
>
> Mr John W. Raby, Meteorologist
> U.S. Army Research Laboratory
> White Sands Missile Range, NM 88002
> (575) 678-2004 DSN 258-2004
> FAX (575) 678-1230 DSN 258-1230
> Email: john.raby at us.army.mil
>
> Please begin using the email address within this signature block for
> all future correspondence. The current @arl.army.mil address will
be
> decommissioned in upcoming months.
>
> "When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in
> numbers, you know something about it, but when you cannot measure
it,
> when you cannot express it in number, your knowledge is of a meagre
> and unsatisfactory kind". - Lord Kelvin
>
>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
>
>
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
------------------------------------------------
Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: Raby, John
Time: Thu Oct 28 09:27:45 2010
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
John -
Up to and including the processing I did on SEP 13, I know we were
using
METv2.0 for everything.
When I resumed processing on OCT 21 (after we compiled METv3.0 on OCT
7) I
believe that I was using METv3.0 and was running Stat-Analysis to
process the
same Point-Stat output I was working with back in SEP (produced using
METv2.0).
John
-----Original Message-----
From: RAL HelpDesk {for John Halley Gotway} [mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:17 AM
To: Raby, John (Civ, ARL/CISD)
Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] AutoReply: Stat-Analysis Warning
Message
(UNCLASSIFIED)
John,
Are you sure that you're using the METv2.0 version of STAT-Analysis to
process
the METv2.0 Point-Stat output, and using the METv3.0 version of STAT-
Analysis
to process the METv3.0 Point-Stat output?
If not, that could cause such a range check error message.
John
On 10/28/2010 09:14 AM, RAL HelpDesk {for Raby, John} wrote:
> Further into the processing, there were instances where the same
WARNING
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
------------------------------------------------
Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: Raby, John
Time: Thu Oct 28 10:22:45 2010
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
John -
I tried to do this from my Linux system in the command line and it
doesn't
seem to recognize the -p option (unknown option). On my Windows
desktop, I
tried the same but I can't seem to connect (firewall maybe?) I've
submitted a
trouble ticket here to see what can be done.
The files are 2 mb each. Could I send these to you by email?
Thanks.
R/
John
-----Original Message-----
From: RAL HelpDesk {for John Halley Gotway} [mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:06 AM
To: Raby, John (Civ, ARL/CISD)
Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] Stat-Analysis Warning Message
(UNCLASSIFIED)
John,
Sure, we're happy to help. I'm not sure what's going on. The problem
may
exist in 1 of two places:
(1) Perhaps something's different about your runs of Point-Stat, and
you
Point-Stat output has changed.
(2) Perhaps something's different about the STAT-Analysis job.
Ultimately, I think it'll be easiest if you just send me some sample
data to
play with. Please execute the following commands and send me this
test data:
tar -cvzf before.tar.gz
MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_P2/*/point_stat_m1o1_P2_110000L*.stat
tar -cvzf after.tar.gz
MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_T3/*/point_stat_m1o1_T3_110000L*.stat
And then you can follow the instructions here for posting the
"before.tar.gz"
and "after.tar.gz" files to our anonymous FTP site:
http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/support/met_help.php#ftp
Please let me know when the data is there, and I'll try to debug it.
John
On 10/27/2010 04:37 PM, RAL HelpDesk {for Raby, John} wrote:
>
> Wed Oct 27 16:37:54 2010: Request 41782 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by john.raby at us.army.mil
> Queue: met_help
> Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
> Owner: Nobody
> Requestors: john.raby at us.army.mil
> Status: new
> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=41782
> >
>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> I have been running Stat-Analysis on Point-Stat results we generated
> this past summer. This proceeded well until I started noticing that
> the output .txt files on the last couple of runs were 0-sized files
> which is unexpected.
>
> I have attached examples of Stat-Analysis log files which show the
> dialog before and after. The after file shows a warning about "no
> matching stat lines" after having read in and retained 1565906 stat
lines.
>
> I checked sample stat lines (.stat files) before and after and note
no
> obvious differences or problems.
>
> The only change which I'm aware of which occurred between the two
> cases was that our new MET V3.0 was compiled on OCT 7.
>
> The processing of the "before" case which occurred on SEP 13 and the
> processing for the "after" case on OCT 21.
>
> Can you assist me in troubleshooting this?
>
> Thanks.
> R/
> John
>
>
> Mr John W. Raby, Meteorologist
> U.S. Army Research Laboratory
> White Sands Missile Range, NM 88002
> (575) 678-2004 DSN 258-2004
> FAX (575) 678-1230 DSN 258-1230
> Email: john.raby at us.army.mil
>
> Please begin using the email address within this signature block for
> all future correspondence. The current @arl.army.mil address will
be
> decommissioned in upcoming months.
>
> "When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in
> numbers, you know something about it, but when you cannot measure
it,
> when you cannot express it in number, your knowledge is of a meagre
> and unsatisfactory kind". - Lord Kelvin
>
>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
>
>
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
------------------------------------------------
Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: Raby, John
Time: Thu Oct 28 11:00:03 2010
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
John -
The Help Desk showed me how to use the right version of ftp with the
-p
option.
The 2 files should be there now.
Thanks.
R/
John
-----Original Message-----
From: RAL HelpDesk {for John Halley Gotway} [mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:06 AM
To: Raby, John (Civ, ARL/CISD)
Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] Stat-Analysis Warning Message
(UNCLASSIFIED)
John,
Sure, we're happy to help. I'm not sure what's going on. The problem
may
exist in 1 of two places:
(1) Perhaps something's different about your runs of Point-Stat, and
you
Point-Stat output has changed.
(2) Perhaps something's different about the STAT-Analysis job.
Ultimately, I think it'll be easiest if you just send me some sample
data to
play with. Please execute the following commands and send me this
test data:
tar -cvzf before.tar.gz
MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_P2/*/point_stat_m1o1_P2_110000L*.stat
tar -cvzf after.tar.gz
MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_T3/*/point_stat_m1o1_T3_110000L*.stat
And then you can follow the instructions here for posting the
"before.tar.gz"
and "after.tar.gz" files to our anonymous FTP site:
http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/support/met_help.php#ftp
Please let me know when the data is there, and I'll try to debug it.
John
On 10/27/2010 04:37 PM, RAL HelpDesk {for Raby, John} wrote:
>
> Wed Oct 27 16:37:54 2010: Request 41782 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by john.raby at us.army.mil
> Queue: met_help
> Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
> Owner: Nobody
> Requestors: john.raby at us.army.mil
> Status: new
> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=41782
> >
>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> I have been running Stat-Analysis on Point-Stat results we generated
> this past summer. This proceeded well until I started noticing that
> the output .txt files on the last couple of runs were 0-sized files
> which is unexpected.
>
> I have attached examples of Stat-Analysis log files which show the
> dialog before and after. The after file shows a warning about "no
> matching stat lines" after having read in and retained 1565906 stat
lines.
>
> I checked sample stat lines (.stat files) before and after and note
no
> obvious differences or problems.
>
> The only change which I'm aware of which occurred between the two
> cases was that our new MET V3.0 was compiled on OCT 7.
>
> The processing of the "before" case which occurred on SEP 13 and the
> processing for the "after" case on OCT 21.
>
> Can you assist me in troubleshooting this?
>
> Thanks.
> R/
> John
>
>
> Mr John W. Raby, Meteorologist
> U.S. Army Research Laboratory
> White Sands Missile Range, NM 88002
> (575) 678-2004 DSN 258-2004
> FAX (575) 678-1230 DSN 258-1230
> Email: john.raby at us.army.mil
>
> Please begin using the email address within this signature block for
> all future correspondence. The current @arl.army.mil address will
be
> decommissioned in upcoming months.
>
> "When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in
> numbers, you know something about it, but when you cannot measure
it,
> when you cannot express it in number, your knowledge is of a meagre
> and unsatisfactory kind". - Lord Kelvin
>
>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
>
>
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
------------------------------------------------
Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Thu Oct 28 12:43:23 2010
John,
Hmmm, I'm a bit confused. I took a look at all of the data you sent
me and it is all output from METv2.0. The first column in the .stat
output is the version number, and it contains "V2.0" in all
the output you sent me.
When I ran this data through the STAT-Analysis tool (both STAT-
Analysis version 2.0 and version 3.0), I get 20 matching lines each
time. You can see the attached script and output files.
So I'm not able to reproduce the problem you're seeing with the data
you sent me.
John
On 10/28/2010 11:00 AM, RAL HelpDesk {for Raby, John} wrote:
>
> <URL: https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=41782 >
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> John -
>
> The Help Desk showed me how to use the right version of ftp with the
-p
> option.
>
> The 2 files should be there now.
>
> Thanks.
>
> R/
> John
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RAL HelpDesk {for John Halley Gotway}
[mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:06 AM
> To: Raby, John (Civ, ARL/CISD)
> Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] Stat-Analysis Warning Message
> (UNCLASSIFIED)
>
> John,
>
> Sure, we're happy to help. I'm not sure what's going on. The
problem may
> exist in 1 of two places:
> (1) Perhaps something's different about your runs of Point-Stat, and
you
> Point-Stat output has changed.
> (2) Perhaps something's different about the STAT-Analysis job.
>
> Ultimately, I think it'll be easiest if you just send me some sample
data to
> play with. Please execute the following commands and send me this
test data:
>
> tar -cvzf before.tar.gz
> MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_P2/*/point_stat_m1o1_P2_110000L*.stat
> tar -cvzf after.tar.gz
> MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_T3/*/point_stat_m1o1_T3_110000L*.stat
>
> And then you can follow the instructions here for posting the
"before.tar.gz"
> and "after.tar.gz" files to our anonymous FTP site:
> http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/support/met_help.php#ftp
>
> Please let me know when the data is there, and I'll try to debug it.
>
> John
>
> On 10/27/2010 04:37 PM, RAL HelpDesk {for Raby, John} wrote:
>>
>> Wed Oct 27 16:37:54 2010: Request 41782 was acted upon.
>> Transaction: Ticket created by john.raby at us.army.mil
>> Queue: met_help
>> Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
>> Owner: Nobody
>> Requestors: john.raby at us.army.mil
>> Status: new
>> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=41782
>>>
>>
>>
>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>> Caveats: NONE
>>
>> I have been running Stat-Analysis on Point-Stat results we
generated
>> this past summer. This proceeded well until I started noticing that
>> the output .txt files on the last couple of runs were 0-sized files
>> which is unexpected.
>>
>> I have attached examples of Stat-Analysis log files which show the
>> dialog before and after. The after file shows a warning about "no
>> matching stat lines" after having read in and retained 1565906 stat
lines.
>>
>> I checked sample stat lines (.stat files) before and after and note
no
>> obvious differences or problems.
>>
>> The only change which I'm aware of which occurred between the two
>> cases was that our new MET V3.0 was compiled on OCT 7.
>>
>> The processing of the "before" case which occurred on SEP 13 and
the
>> processing for the "after" case on OCT 21.
>>
>> Can you assist me in troubleshooting this?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> R/
>> John
>>
>>
>> Mr John W. Raby, Meteorologist
>> U.S. Army Research Laboratory
>> White Sands Missile Range, NM 88002
>> (575) 678-2004 DSN 258-2004
>> FAX (575) 678-1230 DSN 258-1230
>> Email: john.raby at us.army.mil
>>
>> Please begin using the email address within this signature block
for
>> all future correspondence. The current @arl.army.mil address will
be
>> decommissioned in upcoming months.
>>
>> "When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in
>> numbers, you know something about it, but when you cannot measure
it,
>> when you cannot express it in number, your knowledge is of a meagre
>> and unsatisfactory kind". - Lord Kelvin
>>
>>
>>
>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>> Caveats: NONE
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------
Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Thu Oct 28 12:43:23 2010
+++++ Running METv2.0 STAT-Analysis on results_m1o1_P2 +++++
STAT Lines read = 61973
STAT Lines retained = 61973
Processing Job 1: -job aggregate_stat -fcst_lead 110000 -fcst_lev Z10
-obtype ADPSFC -line_type VL1L2 -out_line_type WDIR
JOB_LIST: -job aggregate_stat -fcst_lead 110000 -fcst_lev Z10
-obtype ADPSFC -line_type VL1L2 -out_line_type WDIR
COL_NAME: TOTAL FBAR OBAR ME MAE
ROW_MEAN_WDIR: 20 242.68032 214.85893 -19.86976 25.51094
AGGR_WDIR: 4921 240.17665 224.66660 -15.51005 NA
Job 1 used 20 out of 61973 STAT lines.
+++++ Running METv2.0 STAT-Analysis on results_m1o1_T3 +++++
STAT Lines read = 61973
STAT Lines retained = 61973
Processing Job 1: -job aggregate_stat -fcst_lead 110000 -fcst_lev Z10
-obtype ADPSFC -line_type VL1L2 -out_line_type WDIR
JOB_LIST: -job aggregate_stat -fcst_lead 110000 -fcst_lev Z10
-obtype ADPSFC -line_type VL1L2 -out_line_type WDIR
COL_NAME: TOTAL FBAR OBAR ME MAE
ROW_MEAN_WDIR: 20 243.10504 214.85893 -21.55843 27.36407
AGGR_WDIR: 4921 238.12307 224.66660 -13.45648 NA
Job 1 used 20 out of 61973 STAT lines.
+++++ Running METv3.0 STAT-Analysis on results_m1o1_P2 +++++
STAT Lines read = 61973
STAT Lines retained = 61973
Processing Job 1: -job aggregate_stat -fcst_lead 110000 -fcst_lev Z10
-obtype ADPSFC -line_type VL1L2 -out_line_type WDIR
JOB_LIST: -job aggregate_stat -fcst_lead 110000 -fcst_lev Z10
-obtype ADPSFC -line_type VL1L2 -out_line_type WDIR
COL_NAME: TOTAL FBAR OBAR ME MAE
ROW_MEAN_WDIR: 20 242.68032 214.85893 -19.86976 25.51094
AGGR_WDIR: 4921 240.17665 224.66660 -15.51005 NA
Job 1 used 20 out of 61973 STAT lines.
+++++ Running METv3.0 STAT-Analysis on results_m1o1_T3 +++++
STAT Lines read = 61973
STAT Lines retained = 61973
Processing Job 1: -job aggregate_stat -fcst_lead 110000 -fcst_lev Z10
-obtype ADPSFC -line_type VL1L2 -out_line_type WDIR
JOB_LIST: -job aggregate_stat -fcst_lead 110000 -fcst_lev Z10
-obtype ADPSFC -line_type VL1L2 -out_line_type WDIR
COL_NAME: TOTAL FBAR OBAR ME MAE
ROW_MEAN_WDIR: 20 243.10504 214.85893 -21.55843 27.36407
AGGR_WDIR: 4921 238.12307 224.66660 -13.45648 NA
Job 1 used 20 out of 61973 STAT lines.
------------------------------------------------
Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: Raby, John
Time: Thu Oct 28 12:54:22 2010
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
John -
Thanks for the testing.
I will try re-running Stat-Analysis using the same data using v2.0 to
see if
that changes anything.
I will let you know.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: RAL HelpDesk {for John Halley Gotway} [mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 12:43 PM
To: Raby, John (Civ, ARL/CISD)
Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] Stat-Analysis Warning Message
(UNCLASSIFIED)
John,
Hmmm, I'm a bit confused. I took a look at all of the data you sent
me and it
is all output from METv2.0. The first column in the .stat output is
the
version number, and it contains "V2.0" in all the output you sent me.
When I ran this data through the STAT-Analysis tool (both STAT-
Analysis
version 2.0 and version 3.0), I get 20 matching lines each time. You
can see
the attached script and output files.
So I'm not able to reproduce the problem you're seeing with the data
you sent
me.
John
On 10/28/2010 11:00 AM, RAL HelpDesk {for Raby, John} wrote:
>
> <URL: https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=41782 >
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
> John -
>
> The Help Desk showed me how to use the right version of ftp with the
> -p option.
>
> The 2 files should be there now.
>
> Thanks.
>
> R/
> John
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RAL HelpDesk {for John Halley Gotway}
[mailto:met_help at ucar.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:06 AM
> To: Raby, John (Civ, ARL/CISD)
> Subject: Re: [rt.rap.ucar.edu #41782] Stat-Analysis Warning Message
> (UNCLASSIFIED)
>
> John,
>
> Sure, we're happy to help. I'm not sure what's going on. The
problem
> may exist in 1 of two places:
> (1) Perhaps something's different about your runs of Point-Stat, and
> you Point-Stat output has changed.
> (2) Perhaps something's different about the STAT-Analysis job.
>
> Ultimately, I think it'll be easiest if you just send me some sample
> data to play with. Please execute the following commands and send
me this
> test data:
>
> tar -cvzf before.tar.gz
> MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_P2/*/point_stat_m1o1_P2_110000L*.stat
> tar -cvzf after.tar.gz
> MET_PointStat/results_m1o1_T3/*/point_stat_m1o1_T3_110000L*.stat
>
> And then you can follow the instructions here for posting the
> "before.tar.gz"
> and "after.tar.gz" files to our anonymous FTP site:
> http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/support/met_help.php#ftp
>
> Please let me know when the data is there, and I'll try to debug it.
>
> John
>
> On 10/27/2010 04:37 PM, RAL HelpDesk {for Raby, John} wrote:
>>
>> Wed Oct 27 16:37:54 2010: Request 41782 was acted upon.
>> Transaction: Ticket created by john.raby at us.army.mil
>> Queue: met_help
>> Subject: Stat-Analysis Warning Message (UNCLASSIFIED)
>> Owner: Nobody
>> Requestors: john.raby at us.army.mil
>> Status: new
>> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=41782
>>>
>>
>>
>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>> Caveats: NONE
>>
>> I have been running Stat-Analysis on Point-Stat results we
generated
>> this past summer. This proceeded well until I started noticing that
>> the output .txt files on the last couple of runs were 0-sized files
>> which is unexpected.
>>
>> I have attached examples of Stat-Analysis log files which show the
>> dialog before and after. The after file shows a warning about "no
>> matching stat lines" after having read in and retained 1565906 stat
lines.
>>
>> I checked sample stat lines (.stat files) before and after and note
>> no obvious differences or problems.
>>
>> The only change which I'm aware of which occurred between the two
>> cases was that our new MET V3.0 was compiled on OCT 7.
>>
>> The processing of the "before" case which occurred on SEP 13 and
the
>> processing for the "after" case on OCT 21.
>>
>> Can you assist me in troubleshooting this?
>>
>> Thanks.
>> R/
>> John
>>
>>
>> Mr John W. Raby, Meteorologist
>> U.S. Army Research Laboratory
>> White Sands Missile Range, NM 88002
>> (575) 678-2004 DSN 258-2004
>> FAX (575) 678-1230 DSN 258-1230
>> Email: john.raby at us.army.mil
>>
>> Please begin using the email address within this signature block
for
>> all future correspondence. The current @arl.army.mil address will
be
>> decommissioned in upcoming months.
>>
>> "When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in
>> numbers, you know something about it, but when you cannot measure
it,
>> when you cannot express it in number, your knowledge is of a meagre
>> and unsatisfactory kind". - Lord Kelvin
>>
>>
>>
>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>> Caveats: NONE
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
>
>
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
------------------------------------------------
More information about the Met_help
mailing list