[Met_help] [Fwd: [Wrf-users] Error in Validating WRF-ARW with MET]

John Halley Gotway johnhg at rap.ucar.edu
Tue Feb 23 16:21:07 MST 2010


Joe,

Sorry for the delay.  Actually, I got your support question confused with
a different one we had received recently.  It's essentially the same
question, and I thought we'd already sent you the answer!

I asked the primary WPP support person here, and she told me that since
you're running ARW, you most likely have multiple output times in each
WRFOUT NetCDF file.  That's fine, but you'll need to use a slightly
different script for running WPP.

Try using the "WPPV3.1/scripts/run_wrfpost_frames" script.  That will read
multiple times from the ARW NetCDF files and write them out to separate
GRIB output files - one file per output time.

Please give that a shot and let us know if you encounter any more problems.

Thanks,
John

> Hello
>
> The problem I am currently having is that the WPP is only working on WRF's
> initial output at t=0. For all subsequent writes it chokes in a subroutine
> that is calculating radar ref for non-Ferrier scheme. The help on the WPP
> end is slow at the moment, I believe the person handling this might be
> gone. Does the wrf output need to be in a single file or is multiple files
> fine?
>
> Take care,
> Joe
>
> Dr. Joseph L. Eastman
> Senior Atmospheric Scientist
> WindLogics Inc.
> 201 4th St NW
> Grand Rapids, MN
> 55744
>
> c - 410.279.9702
> w - 651.556.4297
> jeastman at windlogics.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: met_help-bounces at mailman.ucar.edu
> [mailto:met_help-bounces at mailman.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of John Halley Gotway
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 12:56 PM
> To: ridwan.java at gmail.com; met_help
> Subject: Re: [Met_help] [Fwd: [Wrf-users] Error in Validating WRF-ARW with
> MET]
>
> Hello,
>
> You recently sent a support question to "wrfhelp at ucar.edu" regarding the
> use of the MET verification tool.  The wrfhelp support staff forwarded it
> to us here in met_help.  In the future, feel free to
> send MET support questions directly to "met_help at ucar.edu".
>
> It appears that you're trying to use the NetCDF output of WRF directly in
> MET.  Unfortunately, there's an additional step required before MET can
> read the WRF output.  You must first run your WRFOUT
> files through the WRF Post-Processor (WPP).  You can find information
> about installing/running WPP here:
>
> WRF-NMM Download Site:
> http://www.dtcenter.org/wrf-nmm/users/downloads/index.php
> WRF-NMM Users Guide:
> http://www.dtcenter.org/wrf-nmm/users/docs/user_guide/V3/users_guide_nmm_chap1-7.pdf
>
> WPP is posted on the NMM site, but it may run on either WRF-NMM or WRF-ARW
> output.  WPP prepares your model output for verification in 3 main ways:
> (1) Interpolates the data horizontally from a staggered model grid to a
> more standard regularly spaced grid.
> (2) Interpolates vertically from model levels to pressure levels.
> (3) Derives several output fields.
>
> WPP writes it's output in GRIB format, and MET is set up to read that GRIB
> output of WPP.  For the upcoming release of MET, we are working to add
> support for the NetCDF output of the "pinterp" tool -
> a post-processing tool which works only on ARW output.  However, we have
> no plans to support WRF model output directly so as not to duplicate the
> functionality already available in WPP.
>
> Hope that helps clarify the issue.  For more details, please refer to:
> MET Website:         http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users
> MET Users Guide:
> http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/docs/users_guide/MET_Users_Guide_v2.0_rev2.pdf
> MET online tutorial:
> http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/support/online_tutorial/METv2.0/index.php
>
> Also, before responding to any more support questions, we will need you to
> fill out the free registration form on the MET downloads page:
> http://www.dtcenter.org/met/users/downloads/index.php
>
> Just enter your email address in the box and hit enter to be taken to the
> registration form.
>
> Thanks,
> John Halley Gotway
> johnhg at ucar.edu
>
>
> jwolff at ucar.edu wrote:
>> This came to wrf-users at ucar.edu...
>> Though maybe you would want to respond as met_help.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------- Original Message
>> ----------------------------
>> Subject: [Wrf-users] Error in Validating WRF-ARW with MET
>> From:    "Ridwan" <ridwan.java at gmail.com>
>> Date:    Thu, February 18, 2010 8:16 pm
>> To:      wrf-users at ucar.edu
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Dear WRF-users,
>>
>> I want to validate WRF-ARW output with Model Evaluation Tool (MET), but
>> when
>> I combine the .nc file in em_real directory, it always shows the
>> following
>> error:
>>
>> [faisal at localhost METv2.0]$ bin/pcp_combine -sum 00000000_000000 3
>> 20100215_210000 24 tutorial/out/pcp_combine/test.nc -pcpdir
>> data/sample_obs/metPerforming sum command:
>> init_time/in_accum/valid_time/out_accum Times = 0/10800/1266267600/86400
>> Searching for 8 files with accumulation times of 3 hours to sum to a
>> total
>> accumulation time of 24 hours in data/sample_obs/met
>>
>>   *GribFile::skip_header() -> can't find "GRIB" magic cookie
>>
>> ***WARNING*** check_file_time() -> can't open precipitation grib file:
>> data/sample_obs/met/met_em.d01.20100215_030000.nc
>>
>>
>>   GribFile::skip_header() -> can't find "GRIB" magic cookie
>>
>> ***WARNING*** check_file_time() -> can't open precipitation grib file:
>> data/sample_obs/met/met_em.d01.20100215_090000.nc
>> **
>> *Can anyone help me?
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Met_help mailing list
> Met_help at mailman.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/met_help
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of
> any kind is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please contact the sender via reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
> original message. Thank you.
>




More information about the Met_help mailing list