[Go-essp-tech] CMIP5 Data Coming February 1st
Nathan Wilhelmi
wilhelmi at ucar.edu
Fri Jan 14 13:19:41 MST 2011
Hi All,
We believe the 4th bullet is a gateway problem and as such have been
tracking it here. https://vets.development.ucar.edu/jira/browse/SGF-2029
We will follow-up with more details on this shortly.
Thanks!
-Nate
Cinquini, Luca (3880) wrote:
> Hi Dean,
> thanks for the notice... indeed it might be a very good idea to focus
> on CMIP5 preparedness on the next GO-ESSP conf call.
>
> This is my personal understanding of the situation:
>
> o Local system (Data Node + Gateway) are able to collect and deliver
> data, and register users.
>
> o Single Sign On among federation patners is working correctly
>
> o An issue has been uncovered which affects authorization when the
> Data Node is front-ended by a proxy, as it happens for BADC:
> http://esgf.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11
>
> o Another issue has been uncovered recently which affects a user from
> gateway A downloading data published to gateway B when using
> wget/curl, when the data is protected by the an attribute controlled
> by Gateway C (for example, the PCMDI attribute "CMIP5 Research"): the
> download will work only if the user from Gateway A has already logged
> into Gateway B. This may not be the most critical case, at this
> point... See http://esgf.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12
>
> o We have not performed extensive testing of metadata exchange yet,
> although it is generally believed to work.
>
> Everybody, please add your understanding of the current status...
>
> thanks, Luca
>
> On Jan 14, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Williams, Dean N. wrote:
>
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> Karl has informed me that we are expecting to receive
>> CMIP5 model output in 3 weeks, so we must have ESG ready to publish
>> and distribute data to the community by February 1st. At the moment,
>> the targeted model output is CCCma (Canadian Centre for Climate
>> Modelling and Analysis). (I am sure other data sets will quickly
>> follow suit.) To be ready, we must have federation completed. Luca,
>> Stephen, Eric, Craig, and others can you give the status of the
>> federation testing? The last I remember:
>>
>>
>> 1. Stephen was going to include some Hadley data for federation
>> federation testing;
>> 2. Craig was testing replication from multiple sites;
>> 3. Federation security was in place;
>>
>>
>> From what I remember, The federation was mainly completed and
>> mostly tested with a few minor changes needed. Primarily we need to
>> test federation between PCMDI-BADC, PCMDI-DKRZ, PCMDI-ANU, etc.. What
>> else are we missing to be ready for the Febuary 1st deadline?
>>
>> Perhaps this next Tuesday, we can discuss our preparedness for
>> the onslaught of data. How many of us will be around for a Tuesday
>> go-essp meeting at our regular time?
>>
>> Thanks and best regards to all,
>> Dean
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
>
More information about the GO-ESSP-TECH
mailing list