[Go-essp-tech] draft qc use caes

[bryan.lawrence at stfc.ac.uk]

Hi Martina

Thanks for the feedback. Sadly, I'm not going to be able to spend much more time on this document in the near future, but the attached version has been annotated with actions needed in response to your email.

Comments inline below.

>I think I have to wait for a more complete version of that document to
>give valuable input. But a few question/remarks here:

Probably best you ask questions about what is missing ...

>You speak of datasets and collections. Can you give an example for them?
>Is a dataset a realm or an atomic dataset?

I have added a definition and a placeholder for a story.

>I would call the scientist who produced the data the DataOwner or maybe
>the DOI author. The ESG data node manager would be the DataProvider. It
>is not important as long as the definitions are part of the document.

I think the person running the ESG datanode will not be the "owner" of the data in many cases, and so you're right. It needs changing.

>How is the QC Entry Tool used? Can you give a rough input(-output) example?
>Have I understood it correctly and is it agreed that the CIM metadata
>documents will be provided in/via the ESG data node?

The CIM qc documents will need to be ingested by the ESG gateway from the qc entry tool atom feed. I think Maurizio is looking into how to do this. We should have something to play with in terms of entry next week. It will support the information in the new diagram. (Dom may correct me, since this diagram includes my interpretation of his proposals ...). 

>The metadata of the finished QC level 3 is more than quality, i.e. more
>than a CIM quality document. Summary, contact and citations may be
>changed by the author during STD-DOI publication.

OK, good point. Story placeholder for this one too.

I'll follow up with an email on the critical path.

Cheers
Bryan

Bryan Lawrence wrote:
> Hi Martina
>
> This is the best I could do in the time available. (I'm sorry I haven't 
> had a chance to digest your latest emails ... I'm doing this on the side 
> of some other activities ...)
>
> Can you please have a look through, and modify/add as you see fit.
>
> (I think there is probably enough there now to provoke a discussion as 
> to the access control issues in the gateway).
>
> (If you want the EA .eap ... just ask)
>
> Thanks
> Bryan
>
>   





-- 
Scanned by iCritical.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: qc-use-case.odt
Type: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text
Size: 475003 bytes
Desc: qc-use-case.odt
Url : http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/go-essp-tech/attachments/20100915/38a2dad3/attachment-0001.odt 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: qc-use-case.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 468881 bytes
Desc: qc-use-case.pdf
Url : http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/go-essp-tech/attachments/20100915/38a2dad3/attachment-0001.pdf