[Go-essp-tech] QC L2 Checks on MOHC cmip5 data

[Michael Lautenschlager]

Dear Karl,

just a quick answer to your question. We started to document the CMIP5 
QC assurance process in our redmine project management server: 
https://redmine.dkrz.de/collaboration/projects/cmip5-qc/wiki

Here Martina and Frank collect and reference information which is 
related to the QC process in CMIP5 including our two documents on QC and 
DOI data publication. Information on QC-L2 could be obtained from the QC 
Level 2 section and also a working version of the interpretation of the 
QC-L2 output. This is yet not finalised and Martina and Frank will 
continue this section next week when they are back from the AGU in San 
Francisco.

My idea is that they complete and that we should have a discussion about 
the interpretation in order the create a common understanding of what 
"QC-L2 passed" means in detail.

I hope this gives a first information, more details will follow next 
week. Maybe we can link the given redmine entry point into the CMIP5 web 
pages to provide more details on QC within CMIP5.

Best wishes, Michael


Am 13.12.2010 21:02, schrieb Karl Taylor:
> Dear all,
>
> Is the test that determines whether the QC criteria has been met or not
> described anywhere?  The plots show max, min, and mean, but how is it
> determined if these are "in bounds".
>
> thanks,
> Karl
>
> On 12/3/10 9:31 AM, kevin.marsh at stfc.ac.uk wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I’ve run a test of the QC code over some actual MOHC HADGEM2-ES data
>> we have at the BADC in the DRS directory structure, as well as on an
>> example “areacella” file produced by the MOHC. More details and some
>> plots of the results are available at:
>> http://proj.badc.rl.ac.uk/go-essp/wiki/CMIP5/QualityControl
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> --
>> Scanned by iCritical.
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech