[ESP] Which font? With a hypen?

[Eric Marshall]

The discussion seemed to narrow to these images:

http://ndg.nerc.ac.uk/cgi-bin/my-kwiki/index.cgi?ESPwiki


Eric

Glenn Rutledge wrote:
> I'll chime in with a vote to move away from acronyms that already exist. 
> So many ESSP's ESP, ESIP, etc., are already out there.  While GOES does 
> not work for me either since that's the US operational geostationary 
> satellite. 
> I liked the GOEST.  It has some potential meaning in that these 
> Technologies should be in the background doing what it does best- kinda 
> like the cirrus thing.  Necessary but invisible to the user.  #2 vote is 
> the GO-ESSP. 
> Regarding imagery--are all the options in the Web?  I've lost track of 
> which is which.    Glenn
> 
> Eric Marshall wrote:
> 
>> It seems that more people prefer the heavier yellow font (Arial Bold 
>> slightly widened) over the lighter light-blue font (Gill Sans Light 
>> layered). Shall we go with the Arial Bold?
>>
>> It seems of those who care, there is a preference for the hyphen in 
>> go-essp/goessp. Can we agree to this?
>>
>> Does go-essp/goessp win the new name contest opposed to goes, goest, 
>> goesp, etc.
>>
>> If we can arrive at answers for these, then we will have a logo.
>>
>> I will assume that a lack of responses indicates a choice of go-essp w
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Eric W. Marshall
609 452-6673

Raytheon on-site at:
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
P O Box 308              Princeton NJ 08542

The opinions expressed in this message are my own and do not necessarily
reflect those of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Raytheon,
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
the International House of Pancakes nor the U. S. Department of Commerce.