[ESP] Which font? With a hypen?

[Glenn Rutledge]

I'll chime in with a vote to move away from acronyms that already exist. 
 So many ESSP's ESP, ESIP, etc., are already out there.  While GOES does 
not work for me either since that's the US operational geostationary 
satellite.  

I liked the GOEST.  It has some potential meaning in that these 
Technologies should be in the background doing what it does best- kinda 
like the cirrus thing.  Necessary but invisible to the user.  #2 vote is 
the GO-ESSP.  

Regarding imagery--are all the options in the Web?  I've lost track of 
which is which.    Glenn

Eric Marshall wrote:

> It seems that more people prefer the heavier yellow font (Arial Bold 
> slightly widened) over the lighter light-blue font (Gill Sans Light 
> layered). Shall we go with the Arial Bold?
>
> It seems of those who care, there is a preference for the hyphen in 
> go-essp/goessp. Can we agree to this?
>
> Does go-essp/goessp win the new name contest opposed to goes, goest, 
> goesp, etc.
>
> If we can arrive at answers for these, then we will have a logo.
>
> I will assume that a lack of responses indicates a choice of go-essp w