[EMP2012] date of the 2012 eclipse

[Laura Peticolas]

I like this approach ("November 13/14")



I also liked Scott's abstract from earlier in the week.



So we have 3 abstracts: Scott, Hugh, and Russell as first authors. This will be great visibility for this work. I think it is good for where we hope to go!



Laura



________________________________
From: emp2012-bounces at mailman.ucar.edu [emp2012-bounces at mailman.ucar.edu] on behalf of Jay Pasachoff [Jay.M.Pasachoff at williams.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 10:30 AM
To: Eclipse Megamovie Project, Australia 2012
Cc: Lance Jones
Subject: [EMP2012] date of the 2012 eclipse

The AGU is post-eclipse, but I remain worried about people getting tickets for the wrong day by reading the date of the 13th somewhere, so I am in favor of saying "November 13/14" or "November 13 (GMT) and 14 (Australia)." Perhaps we should standardize in the 2 (or 3) abstracts.


On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Lance Jones wrote:

Firstly, in Hugh's abstract we refer to "November 13", but in Randy's it's
"November 14".  I wonder if we should pick local time or GMT for both for
uniformity.

______________________________
Jay M. Pasachoff
Field Memorial Professor of Astronomy
Director, Hopkins Observatory
Williams College
33 Lab Campus Drive
Williamstown, MA 01267-2565
413 597 2105; fax: 413 597 3200
jay.m.pasachoff at williams.edu<mailto:jay.m.pasachoff at williams.edu>

sabbatical through February 1, 2013
Caltech 150-21
Pasadena, CA 91125
jmp at caltech.edu<mailto:jmp at caltech.edu>
cell: 617 285 6351



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/emp2012/attachments/20120808/84055d59/attachment.html