[Wrf-users] Adjusting vertical levels

Feng Liu FLiu at azmag.gov
Fri Jan 13 08:40:59 MST 2012


Jason,
The error message you provided indicates the num_metgrid_levels for input data is 27, but you set it as 65 in your namelist.input. The mismatched vertical levels resulted in the crash, I think. You may have different vertical levels as defined by e-vert, and WRF will do interpolation from num_metgrid_levels to e-vert. However,  num_metgrid_levels  in the namelist.input should be the same as input data. Just straightforward double check this number from your met_em.d0* file. I think it should be 27 rather than 65. Hope that is helpful.
Feng

From: jasonpadovani at gmail.com [mailto:jasonpadovani at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jason Padovani Ginies
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 12:42 AM
To: Feng Liu
Cc: wrf-users
Subject: Re: [Wrf-users] Adjusting vertical levels

Dear Feng,

Somehow WRF portal is automatically changing num_metgrid_levels to a number equal to e_vert when editing ETA levels. In fact that is not the case and there are only 27 levels in the input files as you suggested. Seems like it's worked a treat. Thanks.

Jason
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Feng Liu <FLiu at azmag.gov<mailto:FLiu at azmag.gov>> wrote:
Hi Jason,
The problem is the number of vertical level in the namelist.input, 65, does not match the number (27) in the input data of met_em.d0*_had. Try to change num_metgrid_levels = 65 into  num_metgrid_levels = 27 in the namelist.input. Then it should work.  Thanks.
Feng


num_metgrid_levels
From: wrf-users-bounces at ucar.edu<mailto:wrf-users-bounces at ucar.edu> [mailto:wrf-users-bounces at ucar.edu<mailto:wrf-users-bounces at ucar.edu>] On Behalf Of Jason Padovani Ginies
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:06 AM
To: wrf-users
Subject: [Wrf-users] Adjusting vertical levels

Dear all,

I am trying to arrange vertical levels within a simulation but the simulation ends at start up. Below is the error message I get from any rsl.error files. I am guessing that there is a mismatch between boundary condition vertical levels and the levels I am trying to set up. Is this something that settings can fix or do I have to look up boundary data with higher vertical resolution? If so, can you please suggest high resolution (vertical) boundary data sources?

rsl.error:

 DYNAMICS OPTION: Eulerian Mass Coordinate
    alloc_space_field: domain            1,     46618468 bytes allocated
 -------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
 FATAL CALLED FROM FILE:  <stdin>  LINE:      69
  program wrf: error opening wrfinput_d01 for reading ierr=       -1021
 -------------------------------------------
,num_metgrid_levels=         250
         250          65; input data ide,jde,num_metgrid_levels=         250
      250          27

Kind regards,

Jason


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20120113/901b43cc/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the Wrf-users mailing list