[Wrf-users] cluster interconnect - Infiniband vs 10 gigabit ethernet
Michael.Zulauf at iberdrolaren.com
Tue Apr 12 14:44:03 MDT 2011
Hi all - quick question. Does anyone have data or experience comparing
the performance and scaling of WRF with cluster interconnects utilizing
10 gigabit ethernet (10GigE) vs Infiniband?
We're looking to expand and update our computing resources, and we'd
originally spec'd it with Infiniband. The nodes will have either dual
quad- or hex-core Nehalem type processors. There's been some IT
pushback, suggesting that we should go with 10GigE. I don't have any
direct experience with 10GigE, but my experience with 1GigE shows that
Infiniband scales far better.
I've seen what I'd consider marketing material on the web that suggests
that 10GigE is comparable to Infiniband, but they don't specifically
mention WRF. On the other hand, I've seen other sites that suggest an
Infiniband interconnect is far superior. Again, these don't
specifically mention WRF. I know the particular application in use is
critical when deciding these things, and that WRF is a pretty demanding
application when it comes to the interconnect.
My suspicion is that Infiniband is still significantly superior, but if
I'm going to be able to make any headway with IT, then I'll probably
need some type of numbers to back up my arguments.
Can anyone help?
PLEASE NOTE - NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS:
michael.zulauf at iberdrolaren.com
Meteorologist, Lead Senior
Wind Asset Management
1125 NW Couch, Suite 700
Portland, OR 97209
Office: 503-478-6304 Cell: 503-913-0403
Please be advised that email addresses for Iberdrola Renewables personnel have changed to first.last at iberdrolaREN.com effective Aug. 16, 2010. Please make a note. Thank you.
This message is intended for the exclusive attention of the recipient(s) indicated. Any information contained herein is strictly confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by return e-mail and delete this message from your computer system. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, alteration, filing or sending of this message and/or any attached files may lead to legal action being taken against the party(ies) responsible for said unauthorized use. Any opinion expressed herein is solely that of the author(s) and does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Company. The sender does not guarantee the integrity, speed or safety of this message, and does not accept responsibility for any possible damage arising from the interception, incorporation of viruses, or any other damage as a result of manipulation.
More information about the Wrf-users