[Wrf-users] Fail to run WRFV3.9 with specified eta_level
田越
tianyue0704 at 163.com
Tue Mar 27 06:46:25 MDT 2018
Dear all,
I`m currently running WRF Version 3.9 with 35 specified eta_levels, for the default vertical levels are not dense enough to study the boundary layer phenomenon. However, the calcution always stopped at just few seconds.
I have checked rsl.out.* and rsl.error.* files, and there`s no obvious error message.
I wonder if it is related to the numerically unstable issues, so I have tried different timestep such as 81, 54, 27, 18 ad 6s, but still got CFL prints in the rsl.* files.
Can anyone figure out the reason? Or how can I get more detailed error message? Looking forward to your suggestion.
Here`s my namelist.input :
&time_control
run_days = 0,
run_hours = 42,
run_minutes = 0,
run_seconds = 0,
start_year = 2016, 2016, 2016, 2016,
start_month = 12, 12, 12, 12,
start_day = 06, 06, 06, 06,
start_hour = 00, 00, 00, 00,
start_minute = 00, 00, 00, 00,
start_second = 00, 00, 00, 00,
end_year = 2016, 2016, 2016, 2016,
end_month = 12, 12, 12, 12,
end_day = 07, 07, 07, 07,
end_hour = 18, 18, 18, 18,
end_minute = 00, 00, 00, 00,
end_second = 00, 00, 00, 00,
interval_seconds = 21600
input_from_file = .true., .true., .true., .true.,
history_interval = 1440, 720, 720, 60,
frames_per_outfile = 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000,
restart = .false.,
restart_interval = 3000,
io_form_history = 2,
io_form_restart = 2,
io_form_input = 2,
io_form_boundary = 2,
debug_level = 0,
/
&domains
eta_levels = 1.00, 0.9975, 0.995, 0.9925, 0.99,
0.985, 0.98, 0.975, 0.97, 0.965,
0.96, 0.95, 0.94, 0.93, 0.92,
0.91, 0.90, 0.89, 0.88, 0.87,
0.86, 0.85, 0.84, 0.82, 0.80,
0.75, 0.70, 0.65, 0.60, 0.50,
0.40, 0.30, 0.20, 0.10, 0.00,
time_step = 6,
time_step_fract_num = 0,
time_step_fract_den = 1,
max_dom = 4,
e_we = 200, 178, 187, 205,
e_sn = 200, 190, 193, 205,
e_vert = 35, 35, 35, 35,
p_top_requested = 10000,
num_metgrid_levels = 32,
num_metgrid_soil_levels = 4,
dx = 27000, 9000, 3000, 1000,
dy = 27000, 9000, 3000, 1000,
grid_id = 1, 2, 3, 4,
parent_id = 1, 1, 2, 3,
i_parent_start = 1, 73, 57, 46,
j_parent_start = 1, 69, 65, 63,
parent_grid_ratio = 1, 3, 3, 3,
parent_time_step_ratio = 1, 3, 3, 3,
feedback = 1,
smooth_option = 0,
/
&physics
mp_physics = 2, 2, 2, 2,
ra_lw_physics = 4, 4, 4, 4,
ra_sw_physics = 4, 4, 4, 4,
aer_opt = 2,
aer_aod550_opt = 1, 1, 1, 1,
aer_aod550_val = 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 1.0,
sf_sfclay_physics = 1, 1, 1, 1,
sf_surface_physics = 2, 2, 2, 2,
bl_pbl_physics = 1, 1, 1, 1,
cu_physics = 1, 0, 0, 0,
radt = 27, 9, 3, 1,
bldt = 0, 0, 0, 0,
cudt = 5, 5, 5, 5,
isfflx = 1,
ifsnow = 0,
icloud = 1,
num_soil_layers = 4,
num_land_cat = 21,
sf_urban_physics = 1, 1, 1, 1,
slope_rad = 0, 0, 0, 1,
topo_shading = 0, 0, 0, 1,
topo_wind = 0, 0, 0, 0,
/
&fdda
/
&dynamics
w_damping = 0,
diff_opt = 1, 1, 1, 1,
km_opt = 4, 4, 4, 4,
diff_6th_opt = 0, 0, 0, 0,
diff_6th_factor = 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12,
base_temp = 290.,
damp_opt = 0,
zdamp = 5000., 5000., 5000., 5000.,
dampcoef = 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2,
khdif = 0, 0, 0, 0,
kvdif = 0, 0, 0, 0,
non_hydrostatic = .true.,.true.,.true.,.true.,
moist_adv_opt = 1, 1, 1, 1,
scalar_adv_opt = 1, 1, 1, 1,
/
&bdy_control
spec_bdy_width = 5,
spec_zone = 1,
relax_zone = 4,
specified = .true., .false.,.false.,.false.,
nested = .false., .true., .true.,.true.,
/
&grib2
/
&namelist_quilt
nio_tasks_per_group = 0,
nio_groups = 1,
/
Cheers,
Tian Yue
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20180327/3391f02d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list