[Wrf-users] very cold bias in 3.8.1
Dominikus Heinzeller
climbfuji at ymail.com
Mon Nov 14 02:18:35 MST 2016
Hi Kostas,
Sorry for the late reply. Are you aware of the following bug (with an easy fix) in WRFV3.7 and later?
http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/wrfv3.8/known-prob-3.8.1.html <http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/wrfv3.8/known-prob-3.8.1.html>
Seems this might be hurting you.
Cheers
Dom
> On 2/11/2016, at 10:56 AM, kostas markakis <konstantinos.markakis at lmd.polytechnique.fr> wrote:
>
> Good morning to everyone,
>
> I am experiencing a strange behaviour of a very cold temperature bias when using WRF 3.8.1 (em_real case). I have run the same simulation with version 3.6.1 and i am getting a bias of -1o Celsius. With 3.8.1 i get -7. Has anyone had similar behaviour? I attach my namelist. My domain is the area around Paris, France the topography is relatively flat, away from coastal areas. I am using the BEP urban model. I have tried additionally 2 configurations (changing some schemes with no urban model) only with 3.8.1 and i always get a very cold bias in the order of -5,-6.
>
> I have to note two things:
>
> 1) with the 3.8.1 version i get this strange message in metgrid:
>
> "Note: The following floating-point exceptions are signalling: IEEE_OVERFLOW_FLAG IEEE_UNDERFLOW_FLAG IEEE_DENORMAL"
>
> 2) i never managed to compile WRF3.8.1 with the default flags in configure.wrf. In order to work i had to include several new flags (i attach my configure.wrf)
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> --
>
> Konstantinos Markakis
> Post-doctoral researcher
> LMD (Laboratoire de Meteorologie Dynamique), IPSL
> Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 Place Jussieu
> e-mail: konstantinos.markakis at lmd.polytechnique.fr
>
> <namelist.input><configure.wrf>_______________________________________________
> Wrf-users mailing list
> Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20161114/a8729829/attachment.html
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list