[Wrf-users] ETA levels and WRF surface winds performance

[Julio Castro]

Dear Users and Colleagues,

 

Does anyone have good empirical experience playing with WRF ETA levels?

Can you get better performance of the model in surface winds using high
density ETA levels at lower levels against using the ETA levels default
option? (Leaving aside that you probably need a smaller time step)

 

I'm asking because in one case for my surprise using the ETA levels default
option was the better option by far. But I tested this only for one specific
case. 

 

Kind Regards

 


Julio Castro M.

Ingeniero Civil, MSc., PhD.


Jefe del Área de Modelación y Calidad del Aire


cid:83969B68-5B60-49B4-AE8A-CFDE16B1D669

Padre Mariano 103, Of. 307
Providencia, Santiago
Fono: +56 2 27195 610
Fax: +56 2 22351 100
 <http://www.gac.cl/> www.gac.cl

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20160622/9b942230/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 7340 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20160622/9b942230/attachment.png