[Wrf-users] Same namelist running in wrf 3.4.1 but not in wrf 3.5

[Dominikus Heinzeller]

Hello,

I ran into this problem when the time dimension in the wrfbdy file exceeded the (hard) limit set in external/io_netcdf/wrf_io.F90	 (or external/io_netcdf/wrf_io.F90 or external/io_pnetcdf/wrf_io.F90, depending on your I/O format):

integer                , parameter      :: MaxTimes         = 10000

Did you increase this limit in your previous version of WRF? The error reported by WRF (MMINLU…) is not necessarily the real cause of the problem, which makes it a bit tricky to find out what is going on.

Best,

Dom

On 10/02/2014, at 11:10 am, Tabish Ansari <tabishumaransari at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello
> 
> I am getting the following error while running wrf.exe (v 3.5)
> 
> Timing for Writing wrfout_d01_2012-03-31_00:00:00 for domain        1:    1.59110 elapsed seconds
>  d01 2012-03-31_00:00:00 Input data processed for aux input   4 for domain   1
>  d01 2012-03-31_00:00:00  MMINLU error on input
>             3 input_wrf: wrf_get_next_time current_date: 2012-03-31_00:00:00 Sta
>  tus =          -11
>  -------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
>  FATAL CALLED FROM FILE:  <stdin>  LINE:     885
>   ... Could not find matching time in input file 
>  
>  -------------------------------------------
> application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, 1) - process 0
> 
> 
> However, wrf.exe is running for the same namelist in version 3.4.1
> All met_em* files, wrfinput and wrfbdy files are in place.
> 
> -- 
> Thanks & Regards
> Tabish Umar Ansari
> MS Research Scholar
> Environmental & Water Resources Engineering Division
> Department of Civil Engineering
> IIT Madras
> _______________________________________________
> Wrf-users mailing list
> Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20140210/aa03df85/attachment.html