[Wrf-users] How to deal with the problem that Typhoon Intensity is underestimated?
孙佳
sunjiaouc at sina.com
Mon Dec 16 19:19:08 MST 2013
Dear all,
Thank you for your time at first!
I have run WRF to study a typhoon case and the result shows a good path but an underestimated intensity. Do you know how to improve the estimated intensity accuracy?
FYI, JMA best track data gives a minimum SLP of 940hPa and a maximum wind speed of 50m/s while my WRF output shows only 960hPa and 30m/s, respectively.
The following is my namelist set, and at the same time my resolution is 30/10 Km.
&physics
mp_physics = 2, 2,
ra_lw_physics = 1, 1,
ra_sw_physics = 1, 1,
radt = 10, 10,
sf_sfclay_physics = 1, 1,
sf_surface_physics = 2, 2,
bl_pbl_physics = 1, 1,
bldt = 0, 0,
cu_physics = 1, 1,
cudt = 0, 0,
isfflx = 2,
isftcflx = 2,
ifsnow = 0,
icloud = 1,
surface_input_source = 1,
num_soil_layers = 4,
sf_urban_physics = 0, 0,
maxiens = 1,
maxens = 3,
maxens2 = 3,
maxens3 = 16,
ensdim = 144,
sst_update = 1,
/
&fdda
/
&dynamics
w_damping = 0,
diff_opt = 1,
km_opt = 4,
diff_6th_opt = 0, 0,
diff_6th_factor = 0.50, 0.50,
base_temp = 290.,
damp_opt = 0,
zdamp = 5000., 5000.,
dampcoef = 0.2, 0.2,
khdif = 0, 0,
kvdif = 0, 0,
non_hydrostatic = .true., .true.,
moist_adv_opt = 1, 1,
scalar_adv_opt = 1, 1,
/
2013-12-17
Jia, SUN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20131217/db4bef67/attachment.html
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list