[Wrf-users] RAINC, RAINNC, or RAINC+RAINNC?

[Reginaldo Ventura de Sá]

Hi Gisele,

Rainfall Output:

RAINC comes from cumulus scheme.

RAINNC comes from microphysics scheme.

Total precipitation is RAINC + RAINNC.

Att.,


-- 
*Reginaldo Ventura de Sá *
*Meteorologist *
*Ms.Sc. Atmospheric Sciences in Engineering.*
*Specialist in High Performance Computing*
*Mobile#:*  +55 (21) 9671-0680




On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Gisele dos Santos Zepka <
giselezepka at bol.com.br> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> In order to identify the best combination of cumulus+microphysics
> parameterizations that provides the precipitation associated with a MCS,
> I run several WRF simulations testing different schemes combinations. I
> have the observed rainfall data and I intend to compare them with the
> model rainfall outputs. As I am working with high space resolution (2
> km), in some simulations I also turned off the convection scheme. My
> question is what precipitation variable from WRF should I use to make
> this analysis: RAINC, RAINNC, or RAINC+RAINNC?
>
> Any help will be great.
>
> --
> ____________________________________________
>
> Dra. Gisele dos Santos Zepka Saraiva
> Meteorologist - Atmopheric Electricity
> National Institute for Space Research - INPE
> Av. dos Astronautas, 1758
> São José dos Campos, SP
> Brazil, 12227-010
>
> Phone:++55(12) 3208-6841
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wrf-users mailing list
> Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20130919/9f8381b1/attachment.html