[Wrf-users] Variability in water vapour simulations
Agnes Mika
agnes.mika at bmtargoss.com
Mon Jun 8 04:59:55 MDT 2009
Dear all,
I am engaged in a project where we are evaluating the possibility of
mitigating atmospheric effects (specifically water vapour) on
electromagnetic signal propagation delay using NWP. What we are doing
is to produce integrated water vapour simulations with WRF for
various areas around the globe (inc. single mountain peaks, complex
mountains, flat areas) at high (1 km) resolution and verify the
results against MERIS and InSAR data.
Our results compare reasonably well with measurements above mountains
but they are worthless in flat areas (i.e, the water vapour fields
are just toooo smooth). We are suspecting that WRF can predict
reasonably well the vertical stratification of water vapour but fails
to adequately account for turbulence. What we see is that the degree
of variation in the WRF-predicted water vapour fields is much less
than that seen in MERIS or InSAR data (all taken at the same
resolution of course).
The next step for us is to find a way to increase the degree of
variation in the WRF water vapour predictions. It is not a
requirement that the individual features reflect reality closely but
we should at least capture the proper degree of variation.
I would welcome any ideas on how to achieve an enhancement of
variability in the WRF water vapour predictions. Are there some
physics parameterization options which are more suitable for this? Is
it worth experimenting with improving the land-use maps? Any other
suggestions?
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
A'gnes
--
Dr. A'gnes Mika
Advisor, Meteorology and Air Quality
Tel: +31 (0)527-242299
Fax: +31 (0)527-242016
Web: www.bmtargoss.com
BMT ARGOSS
P.O. Box 61, 8325 ZH Vollenhove
Voorsterweg 28, 8316 PT Marknesse
The Netherlands
Confidentiality Notice & Disclaimer
The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended for the
use of the mail addressee(s) shown. If you are not that person, you
are not allowed to take any action based upon it or to copy it,
forward, distribute or disclose its contents and you should delete it
from your system. BMT ARGOSS does not accept liability for any errors
or omissions in the context of this e-mail or its attachments which
arise as a result of internet transmission, nor accept liability for
statements which are those of the author and clearly not made on
behalf of BMT ARGOSS.
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list