[Wrf-users] wrf 3.1 runtime problem, smpar build on OS X [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

[Chris.Thomas at ga.gov.au]

Hi,

Thanks everyone for suggestions.

I'm using Portland compilers, I forgot to mention that in original post.

I haven't had time to try the suggestions made by people, I'll report back when I have. But note that I had no  problems like this with 3.0.1, even without setting stacksizes and all that stuff.

Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: John Michalakes [mailto:john at michalakes.us]
Sent: Thursday, 4 June 2009 11:42 PM
To: Thomas Chris; wrf-users at ucar.edu
Subject: RE: [Wrf-users] wrf 3.1 runtime problem, smpar build on OS X [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Hi Chris,

Which compiler are you using?  I've been working through some similar problems with the new Intel 11 Fortran compiler; not quite there yet.  Meantime, though, please see the discussion at http://forum.wrfforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=609 .  This might help.

John


-----------------------------------------------------------
John Michalakes, Software Engineer        michalak at ucar.edu
NCAR, MMM Division                   voice: +1 303 497 8199
3450 Mitchell Lane                     fax: +1 303 497 8181
Boulder, Colorado 80301 U.S.A.        cell: +1 720 209 2320
        http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/individual/michalakes
-----------------------------------------------------------



From: wrf-users-bounces at ucar.edu [mailto:wrf-users-bounces at ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Chris.Thomas at ga.gov.au
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:18 PM
To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
Subject: [Wrf-users] wrf 3.1 runtime problem, smpar build on OS X [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Hi,

I am running wrf on (among other machines) a dual core intel Mac with OS X 10.5.6

If I build wrf model with smpar, basic nesting, I get a segmentation error when I attempt to run a real data case (three nests, but I get the same error if I set max_dom = 1). The model starts but error occurs after the output text WRF NUMBER OF TILES = 2.

I do not have the same problem for:

a serial build of wrf 3.1 on the same machine,
an smpar build of wrf 3.0.1 on the same machine, or
an smpar build of wrf 3.1 on a linux x86-64 machine.

Any ideas or advice would be much appreciated.

Chris

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20090605/3f87a5f5/attachment.html