[Wrf-users] Re: NaN values

Mon Dec 15 11:58:36 MST 2008

I've got the same problem using some parametrizations on a Itanium based
cluster. But, i couldn't solve it. When i use diferent parametrizations all
be right.

Could you send more specifications? namelist.input and machine architecture.

Regards

2008/12/15 Goran Gasparac <gorangas at gmail.com>

> Regarding to earlier mail..
> I also checked metgrid and ungrib logs, and everything is correct..
>
> Also, didn't change anything in configuration,and today WRF is running OK..
> Very mysterious..
>
> BR
> Goran
>
>
> 2008/12/15 Goran Gasparac <gorangas at gmail.com>
>
> Dear all,
>>
>> I'm running WRF - ARW with GFS (0.5 degree, 1 week) with files
>> gfs.t00z.master.grbf* .
>> Yesterday (14.12) my WRF run finished forecasting with a lot's of NaN.
>> Same happened at friday 05.12.
>> In 14.12 WRF run, NaN values appeared from 7th term to end,and in 05.12
>> WRF run, they appeared 21st term,also to the end (1 term equals 3 hour
>> period).
>>
>> I suppose it is not because of my WRF configuration because it is working
>> for about 3 months with same configuration, and this kind of problem never
>> happened before.
>>
>> Did anybody had a same problem, or have an idea/suggestion what is wrong?
>> It cross my mind, that maybe there was bug in GFS data??
>>
>> When ploting data (from 14.12 WRF run) with NCL, i get an error in
>> terminal:
>> *(0)  **   Working on time: 2008-12-14_18:00:00
>> fatal:Subscript out of range, error in subscript #0
>> fatal:An error occurred reading P**
>>
>> **(2008-12-14_18:00:00 equals 7th term*)
>>
>> Appreciate any help,
>> Best regards
>> Goran
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Goran
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wrf-users mailing list
> Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>
>

-- 
Atentamente
Jorge Arévalo Bórquez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20081215/81998b58/attachment.html