[Wrf-users] Output with NaN
Jorge Alejandro Arevalo Borquez
jaareval at gmail.com
Thu Nov 13 07:34:47 MST 2008
Hi,
I'm running WRFV3.0 with the followings parameters, and post-process with
NCL, but in 4th and next times of output i obtain NaN for all variables, NCL
script is Ok, because use it for a lot more of runs, this run is a restart
from another begining at 2008-01-16, results for these run looks fine. I run
twice this simulations, in both cases the results are the same. I include my
namelist.input
&time_control
run_days = 7,
run_hours = 0,
run_minutes = 0,
run_seconds = 0,
start_year = 2008, 2008, 2008,
start_month = 01, 01, 01,
start_day = 17, 17, 17,
start_hour = 00, 00, 00,
start_minute = 00, 00, 00,
start_second = 00, 00, 00,
end_year = 2008, 2008, 2008,
end_month = 01, 01, 01,
end_day = 23, 23, 23,
end_hour = 00, 00, 00,
end_minute = 00, 00, 00,
end_second = 00, 00, 00,
interval_seconds = 21600
input_from_file = .true.,.true.,.true.,
history_interval = 60, 60, 60,
frames_per_outfile = 1000, 1000, 1000,
restart = .true.,
restart_interval = 1440,
io_form_history = 2
io_form_restart = 2
io_form_input = 2
io_form_boundary = 2
debug_level = 000
/
&domains
eta_levels = 1.000, 0.994, 0.987, 0.979, 0.97,
0.96, 0.949, 0.937, 0.924, 0.909,
0.892, 0.873, 0.851, 0.826, 0.798,
0.768, 0.736, 0.702, 0.666, 0.629,
0.5915, 0.5536, 0.5153, 0.4773, 0.44,
0.404, 0.3695, 0.3375, 0.3085, 0.2845,
0.2645, 0.2465, 0.2305, 0.2165, 0.2035,
0.1915, 0.1792, 0.1667, 0.1539, 0.1407,
0.1272, 0.1134, 0.0995, 0.0855, 0.0713,
0.0571, 0.0429, 0.0287, 0.0145, 0.000,
time_step = 100,
time_step_fract_num = 0,
time_step_fract_den = 1,
max_dom = 3,
s_we = 1,1,1,
e_we = 50,50,92,
s_sn = 1,1,1,
e_sn = 50,50,36,
s_vert = 1, 1, 1,
e_vert = 50, 50, 50,
num_metgrid_levels = 27
dx = 24500,3500,500,
dy = 24500,3500,500,
grid_id = 1,2,3,
parent_id = 0,1,2,
i_parent_start = 1,21,18,
j_parent_start = 1,21,27,
parent_grid_ratio = 1,7,7,
parent_time_step_ratio = 1,7,7,
feedback = 1,
smooth_option = 0
/
&physics
mp_physics = 2, 2, 2,
ra_lw_physics = 99, 99, 99,
ra_sw_physics = 99, 99, 99
radt = 24, 24, 24,
sf_sfclay_physics = 1, 1, 1,
sf_surface_physics = 1, 1, 1,
bl_pbl_physics = 1, 1, 1,
bldt = 0, 0, 0,
cu_physics = 5, 0, 0,
cudt = 0, 0, 0,
isfflx = 1,
ifsnow = 1,
icloud = 1,
surface_input_source = 1,
num_soil_layers = 5,
ucmcall = 0,
mp_zero_out = 0,
maxiens = 1,
maxens = 3,
maxens2 = 3,
maxens3 = 16,
ensdim = 144,
slope_rad = 1,
topo_shading = 1,
usemonalb = .true.
/
&fdda
/
&dynamics
w_damping = 0,
diff_opt = 1,
km_opt = 4,
diff_6th_opt = 0,
diff_6th_factor = 0.12,
base_temp = 290.
damp_opt = 0,
zdamp = 5000., 5000., 5000.,
dampcoef = 0.01, 0.01, 0.01
khdif = 0, 0, 0,
kvdif = 0, 0, 0,
non_hydrostatic = .true., .true., .true.,
pd_moist = .true., .true., .true.,
pd_scalar = .true., .true., .true.,
rk_ord = 3
/
&bdy_control
spec_bdy_width = 5,
spec_zone = 1,
relax_zone = 4,
specified = .true., .false.,.false.,
nested = .false., .true., .true.,
/
&grib2
/
&namelist_quilt
nio_tasks_per_group = 0,
nio_groups = 1,
/
Really, thanks
--
Atentamente
Jorge Arévalo Bórquez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20081113/941f8518/attachment.html
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list