[Wrf-users] wrfout validation. What precision is still valid?
Erick van Rijk
vanrijk at apple.com
Mon Dec 3 12:48:04 MST 2007
Hello user-list,
During my testing of the OpenMP version of WRF V2.2.1 on my 8-core
MacPro I ran into variations in the diffwrf between multiple runs of
the jan2000 test workset.
Most of the diffwrf compares have no differences between variations
from 1 to 8 threads. But sometimes the results will differ from 1 to
10 DIGITS precision. Personally I was expecting some variations in
the LSB because of possible rounding errors, but not to this extent.
So I was wondering what the consensus is in the community about these
variations.
A few questions:
1.Is the algorithm non-precise by default so multiple runs can give
different results?
2. What level of precision still makes a valid result (scientifically
valid / end user valid? is there even a difference?).
3. To create a baseline comparison should I use a single thread run
to prevent boundary problems?
4. What would be considered a small/medium/large workset?
Thank you for your input.
Erick
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list