[Wrf-users] Re: PGI Fortran 7.0
Brent L Shaw
bshaw at wdtinc.com
Wed Oct 3 07:20:49 MDT 2007
Lee,
We have been using the 64-bit version of PGI 7.0-5 AMD Opteron-based
Linux cluster. We have built and run the latest versions of WPS,
WRF-Var (including 3DVAR_OBSPROC and WRF_BC), WRF, and WRFPost without
any problems.
Brent
-----Original Message-----
From: wrf-users-bounces at ucar.edu [mailto:wrf-users-bounces at ucar.edu] On
Behalf Of wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 1:33 AM
To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
Subject: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 3
Send Wrf-users mailing list submissions to
wrf-users at ucar.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
wrf-users-owner at ucar.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Wrf-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Runtime problem with OpenMPI + RSL_LITE + Multiple Domains.
(Mark Dobossy)
2. Re: Runtime problem with OpenMPI + RSL_LITE + Multiple
Domains. (Gerardo Cisneros)
3. PGI Fortran 7.0 (Lee Higbie)
4. wrf problem (lee)
5. Re: Runtime problem with OpenMPI + RSL_LITE + Multiple
Domains. (Mark Dobossy)
6. Re: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2 (ashish no routray)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:59:27 -0400
From: Mark Dobossy <mdobossy at Princeton.EDU>
Subject: [Wrf-users] Runtime problem with OpenMPI + RSL_LITE +
Multiple Domains.
To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
Message-ID: <3CD8B0E7-4382-4117-A75C-4FEDB24431C1 at Princeton.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
I am currently attempting to compile and run WRF on a large (256 node
x 2 procs per node) linux cluster. The MPI implementation I am using
is OpenMPI 1.2.3, and the compilers are the intel 9.1 compilers (icc,
ifort, etc..). For the purposes of our modeling, we need to use
RSL_LITE, nesting and multiple domains.
I have been able to get WRF to compile, and everything works great
for 1 domain. However, when I attempt to do a multiple domain run, I
get a segmentation fault. An example rsl.error file is below (the
host name has been x'd out for security purposes). Has anyone seen
anything like this before? As I mentioned, using a single domain
allows the run to go through without problem. It is only when I
increase the domain to 2 or 3, that I run into trouble. Any tips or
feedback would be greatly appreciated.
-Mark
askid: 25 hostname: xxxxx-186
Quilting with 1 groups of 0 I/O tasks.
Ntasks in X 4, ntasks in Y 8
periodic coords 25 6 1
non periodic coords 25 6 1
WRF V2.2 MODEL
*************************************
Parent domain
ids,ide,jds,jde 1 110 1 110
ims,ime,jms,jme 23 61 77 102
ips,ipe,jps,jpe 29 55 83 96
*************************************
DYNAMICS OPTION: Eulerian Mass Coordinate
med_initialdata_input: calling input_model_input
INITIALIZE THREE Noah LSM RELATED TABLES
STEPRA,STEPCU,STEPBL 14 1 1
*************************************
Nesting domain
ids,ide,jds,jde 1 148 1 127
ims,ime,jms,jme 32 81 90 117
ips,ipe,jps,jpe 38 74 96 111
INTERMEDIATE domain
ids,ide,jds,jde 39 93 32 79
ims,ime,jms,jme 47 71 60 76
ips,ipe,jps,jpe 53 65 66 70
*************************************
[xxxxx-186:17766] *** Process received signal ***
[xxxxx-186:17766] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[xxxxx-186:17766] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
[xxxxx-186:17766] Failing at address: 0x9b
[xxxxx-186:17766] [ 0] /lib64/tls/libpthread.so.0 [0x32d2e0c4f0]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [ 1] /usr/local/openmpi/1.2.3/intel-ib/x86_64/lib64/
libmpi.so.0(MPI_Allgather+0x165) [0x2a9580e935]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [ 2] ./wrf.exe [0x10b2142]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [ 3] ./wrf.exe [0x10b20c8]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [ 4] ./wrf.exe [0x72936a]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [ 5] ./wrf.exe [0x41b7ac]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [ 6] ./wrf.exe [0x40fe51]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [ 7] ./wrf.exe [0x6523be]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [ 8] ./wrf.exe [0x40aa99]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [ 9] ./wrf.exe [0x40aa64]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [10] ./wrf.exe [0x40aa2a]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [11] /lib64/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdb)
[0x32d211c3fb]
[xxxxx-186:17766] [12] ./wrf.exe [0x40a96a]
[xxxxx-186:17766] *** End of error message ***
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:05:48 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerardo Cisneros <gerardo at sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [Wrf-users] Runtime problem with OpenMPI + RSL_LITE +
Multiple Domains.
To: Mark Dobossy <mdobossy at Princeton.EDU>
Cc: wrf-users at ucar.edu
Message-ID:
<Pine.SGI.3.96.1071002160352.9769887R-100000 at zion.americas.sgi.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mark,
You wrote:
> I am currently attempting to compile and run WRF on a large (256 node
> x 2 procs per node) linux cluster. The MPI implementation I am using
> is OpenMPI 1.2.3, [...]
^^^^^^^
Did you apply the RSL_LITE OpenMPI bug fix?
http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/wrfv2/known-prob.html
Currently at the top of the page, you'll find "Bug Fix for
RSL_LITE (Posted 6/21/07)"
Saludos,
Gerardo
--
Dr. Gerardo Cisneros |SGI (Silicon Graphics, S.A. de C.V.)
Scientist |Av. Vasco de Quiroga 3000, Col. Santa Fe
gerardo at sgi.com |01210 Mexico, D.F., MEXICO
(+52-55)5563-7958 |http://www.sgi.com/
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:32:34 -0800
From: Lee Higbie <higbie at arsc.edu>
Subject: [Wrf-users] PGI Fortran 7.0
To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
Message-ID: <4702D512.6080708 at arsc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
We are investigating acquiring a PGI compiler soon and I would like to
know of any experience people have with compiling WRF, and especially
WRF/Var using PGI Fortran 7.0.2 (or any PGI compiler version 7.*).
Thank you for any help you can provide or any experience you can relate.
Wrfhelp only knows about compiler up to pgf 6.2
Lee Higbie
--
Lee Higbie, HPC Generalist +1-907-450-8688 (GMT-9 standard
Arctic Region Supercomputing Center or GMT-8 daylight)
Mail: UAF/ARSC, PO Box 756020, Fairbanks, AK 99775-6020
Physical: UAF/ARSC, WRRB 105-116, 909 Koyukuk Dr., Fairbanks, AK 99775
64 d 51' 36.2" north 147 d 50' 46.9" west
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:41:23 +0800
From: "lee" <west_120 at 163.com>
Subject: [Wrf-users] wrf problem
To: "wrf-users" <wrf-users at ucar.edu>
Message-ID: <200710021041230157194 at 163.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
hi
I got a problem with wrf. I have run wrf model(showed 'wrf:SUCCESS
COMPLETE WRF' in the end of the rsl.error.* and rsl.out.* files )
successfully for a 7-day simulation. And when I came to wrf2grads, it
worked. When it finished, it showed 'GRACEFUL STOP'. the wrfout.ctl and
wrfout.dat files were made by wrf2grads SUCCESSFULLY. But when I use
grads to open wrfout.ctl, I try to display some variables. However, all
the variables including U,V,W,HGT,Z with any level and any time were all
undefined values. How can i deal with this problem. Can you help me?
I appreciate your reply.
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 22:50:48 -0400
From: Mark Dobossy <mdobossy at Princeton.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Wrf-users] Runtime problem with OpenMPI + RSL_LITE +
Multiple Domains.
To: Gerardo Cisneros <gerardo at sgi.com>
Cc: wrf-users at ucar.edu
Message-ID: <D6ED31B2-5081-4ED0-9A2C-B6A9E3DCE916 at Princeton.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Gerardo-
Thank you very much for the tip. That did turn out to be the
problem, and now everything is running great!
-Mark
On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:05 PM, Gerardo Cisneros wrote:
> Mark,
>
> You wrote:
>> I am currently attempting to compile and run WRF on a large (256 node
>> x 2 procs per node) linux cluster. The MPI implementation I am using
>> is OpenMPI 1.2.3, [...]
> ^^^^^^^
>
> Did you apply the RSL_LITE OpenMPI bug fix?
>
> http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/wrfv2/known-prob.html
>
> Currently at the top of the page, you'll find "Bug Fix for
> RSL_LITE (Posted 6/21/07)"
>
> Saludos,
>
> Gerardo
> --
> Dr. Gerardo Cisneros |SGI (Silicon Graphics, S.A. de C.V.)
> Scientist |Av. Vasco de Quiroga 3000, Col. Santa
Fe
> gerardo at sgi.com |01210 Mexico, D.F., MEXICO
> (+52-55)5563-7958 |http://www.sgi.com/
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: 3 Oct 2007 06:25:01 -0000
From: "ashish no routray" <ashishroutray at rediffmail.com>
Subject: [Wrf-users] Re: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2
To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
Message-ID: <20071003062501.16755.qmail at webmail27.rediffmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Dear Young-Run
Thanks for clear the confusion made by Brent.
Ashish
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 wrf-users-request at ucar.edu wrote :
>Send Wrf-users mailing list submissions to
> wrf-users at ucar.edu
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> wrf-users-owner at ucar.edu
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Wrf-users digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Bug Fix for 3DVAR_OBSPROC] (Brent L Shaw)
> 2. RE: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 1 (Dan Dansereau)
> 3. Fw: Re: [Wrf-users] GRIB2 updates for ungrib.exe
> (dcfritz at ncat.edu)
> 4. Fw: File recovery (dcfritz at ncat.edu)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:18:41 -0500
> From: "Brent L Shaw" <bshaw at wdtinc.com>
>Subject: Re: [Wrf-users] Bug Fix for 3DVAR_OBSPROC]
>To: <wrf-users at ucar.edu>
>Message-ID: <2EDF88345AD1D148B685ACA4F8A293C9017B722C at bud.wdtinc.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>WRF Users,
>
>
>
>Yong-Run Guo pointed out that I was incorrectly specifying NESTIX and
>NESTJX in the 3DVAR_OBSPROC namelist. If you remember to follow the
MM5
>convention of NESTIX being the south->north direction, and NESTJX being
>west->east, then the changes I posted last week for 3DVAR_OBSPROC are
>not required. If you make the changes I proposed, then NESTIX and
>NESTJX should follow the standard WRF definition instead.
>
>
>
>Sorry for the confusion! The bottom line is that you must be a bit
more
>careful to read the details about the namelist values in NCAR's
>instructions than I was!
>
>
>
>Thanks to Yong-Run and Dale Barker for looking into this.
>
>
>
>Brent
>
>
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20071001/a2ca0f6
7/attachment-0001.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:17:53 -0700
> From: "Dan Dansereau" <ddansereau at hydropoint.com>
>Subject: [Wrf-users] RE: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 1
>To: <wrf-users at ucar.edu>
>Message-ID:
>
<9E8869B62C56004781914D8107A36DEF018040AE at email.corp.hydropoint.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
>
>Sorry to bother you all
>But - is there any chance of changing the Digest in a way that is can
be
>read.as email? i.e. often time some parts-or all of the emails are
>scrubbed, and placed in a unreadable format unreadable. (may be not
>total unreadable - but very un-friendly)
>These could be formatted into text (not html) and sent out in a way
that
>most/all people could see.
>Switching to HTML via a web browser is not always an option -to chase
>the scrubbed links.
>
>Thanks
>Dan
>-----Original Message-----
> From: wrf-users-bounces at ucar.edu [mailto:wrf-users-bounces at ucar.edu]
On
>Behalf Of wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
>Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:00 PM
>To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
>Subject: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 1
>
>Send Wrf-users mailing list submissions to
> wrf-users at ucar.edu
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> wrf-users-owner at ucar.edu
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Wrf-users digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: GRIB2 updates for ungrib.exe (dcfritz at ncat.edu)
> 2. [Fwd: Re: [Wrf-users] Bug Fix for 3DVAR_OBSPROC] (Yong-Run Guo)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:31:12 -0400
> From: dcfritz at ncat.edu
>Subject: Re: [Wrf-users] GRIB2 updates for ungrib.exe
>To: "Kemp, Eric M." <Eric.Kemp at ngc.com>
>Cc: wrf-users at ucar.edu, wrfhelp at ucar.edu
>Message-ID:
>
><OFFDCEE8E3.867676D5-ON85257366.0081332C-85257366.0081332E at ncat.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20070930/429d49
c
>b/attachment-0001.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:39:14 -0600
> From: Yong-Run Guo <guo at ucar.edu>
>Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Wrf-users] Bug Fix for 3DVAR_OBSPROC]
>To: wrf-users at ucar.edu, wrfhelp at ucar.edu, bshaw at wdtinc.com, Syed
> Rizvi <rizvi at ucar.edu>
>Message-ID: <470122B2.7030703 at ucar.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An embedded message was scrubbed...
> From: "Dale Barker" <dmbarker at ucar.edu>
>Subject: Re: [Wrf-users] Bug Fix for 3DVAR_OBSPROC
>Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:38:06 -0600
>Size: 5383
>Url:
>http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20071001/ec4fa4
e
>d/Wrf-usersBugFixfor3DVAR_OBSPROC-0001.mht
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Wrf-users mailing list
>Wrf-users at ucar.edu
>http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>
>
>End of Wrf-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 1
>****************************************
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:35:27 -0400
> From: dcfritz at ncat.edu
>Subject: Fw: Re: [Wrf-users] GRIB2 updates for ungrib.exe
>To: <wrf-users at ucar.edu>, <wrfhelp at ucar.edu>
>Message-ID:
>
<OF699F7C69.9F40473C-ON85257368.000E3BB3-85257368.000E3BB6 at ncat.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20071001/235baab
0/attachment-0001.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:22:37 -0400
> From: dcfritz at ncat.edu
>Subject: [Wrf-users] Fw: File recovery
>To: <wrf-users at ucar.edu>
>Message-ID:
>
<OFF1CF09CA.2CCDFCCE-ON85257368.0059F64A-85257368.0059F64D at ncat.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20071002/1937cbc
1/attachment-0001.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Wrf-users mailing list
>Wrf-users at ucar.edu
>http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>
>
>End of Wrf-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 2
>****************************************
ASHISH ROUTRAY
Project Scientist & Research Scholar
Centre for Atmospheric Sciences
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Hauz Khas
New Delhi-110016
India
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20071003/5623a1e
f/attachment.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Wrf-users mailing list
Wrf-users at ucar.edu
http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
End of Wrf-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 3
****************************************
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list