[Wrf-users] Evaluating WRFV2.2 results of the conus12km_2001 benchmark

[Jan Ploski]

Hello,

I (finally) got around to running the conus12km_2001 benchmark 
(http://box.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/WG2/bench/conus12km_2001/) using WRFV2.2 in 
our cluster. The README recommends running wrfdiff at the end to compare 
the actual results against the expected. Well, it produces quite a few 
errors of the "Variable not found" sort, and even the Ndifs columns 
contain different numbers, not to mention RMSEs.

If someone else already has (or could) also run the conus12km_2001 
benchmark using WRFV2.2, I'd be very interested in doing a wrfdiff against 
their results in order to gain some confidence that the deviations are due 
to the differences in WRFV2.1 (the benchmark's original version) and 
WRFV2.2 rather than some "user error". Please drop me a note in that case 
so that I can let you download my wrfout_* (or the other way around). 
Thank you!

Best regards,
Jan Ploski

--
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Jan Ploski
OFFIS
Betriebliches Informationsmanagement
Escherweg 2  - 26121 Oldenburg - Germany
Fon: +49 441 9722 - 184 Fax: +49 441 9722 - 202
E-Mail: Jan.Ploski at offis.de - URL: http://www.offis.de