[Wrf-users] WRF Benchmark Results
Brent L Shaw
bshaw at wdtinc.com
Tue Aug 7 14:55:37 MDT 2007
Hello all,
I am running WRF on a new AMD Opteron-based Linux cluster (using PGI
compilers, DM Parallel, RSL_LITE). I have used similarly configured
clusters with great success, but on this particular system I am seeing
very poor scalability when exceeding more than two nodes (I actually see
0 and even some negative scalability for a problem that should be
scaling well across the cluster). The two main differences between this
new cluster and previous clusters I have used are:
1. The compute nodes on this new cluster have two dual-core Opteron
processors, whereas in the past I have only had access to dual
single-core Opterons.
2. This compute node only has Gigabit Ethernet for MPICH, whereas
in the past I have always had Myrinet. The "conventional wisdom" is
that for a small cluster (8 nodes or less), there is not a huge
advantage in using Myrinet vs. Gig-E. However, I wonder if that is
still true now that we can run 4 processes/node instead of 2?
Do any of you out there in WRF-land have a similar cluster for which you
would be willing to share some benchmark results? I am in the process
of running the standard WRF CONUS 12-km benchmark on a range of 1-16
processors.
Thanks in advance to anyone willing to discuss this with me!
Brent
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20070807/521c4371/attachment.html
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list