[Wrf-users] Error to run wrf.exe
ashish no routray
ashishroutray at rediffmail.com
Sat Jul 21 01:16:58 MDT 2007
Dear Syad
your problem looks like the CFL criteria.
Please adjust your time step. Give less time step, hope it will work fine.
All the best.
Ashish
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 wrf-users-request at ucar.edu wrote :
>Send Wrf-users mailing list submissions to
> wrf-users at ucar.edu
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> wrf-users-owner at ucar.edu
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Wrf-users digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 35, Issue 15 (Bernardo de los Santos)
> 2. wrf.exe errors
> (Syed, Hazari I. (LARC-D318)[RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES CO])
> 3. Bug fixes for ARWpost (Kemp, Eric M.)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:54:37 -0200
> From: "Bernardo de los Santos" <bernardo at fisica.edu.uy>
>Subject: [Wrf-users] Re: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 35, Issue 15
>To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
>Message-ID: <20070719225328.M94119 at fisica.edu.uy>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>Dear Elif:
>
>http://data.ecmwf.int/data/
>
>--
>Bernardo de los Santos
>
>---------- Original Message -----------
> From: wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
>To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
>Sent: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:00:03 -0600 (MDT)
>Subject: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 35, Issue 15
>
> > Send Wrf-users mailing list submissions to
> > wrf-users at ucar.edu
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > wrf-users-owner at ucar.edu
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Wrf-users digest..."
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. ECMWF (Elif SERTEL)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:20:10 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: "Elif SERTEL" <esertel at envsci.rutgers.edu>
> > Subject: [Wrf-users] ECMWF
> > To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
> > Message-ID:
> > <2233.172.23.42.253.1184851210.squirrel at webmail.envsci.rutgers.edu>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> >
> > Dear WRF Users,
> >
> > I want to use ECMWF data for my initial and boundary conditions. I would
> > like to ask if anyone suggests me an alternative web site to
> > download this data.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Elif.
> >
> > --
> > Visiting Fulbright Researcher
> > Rutgers University
> > Department of Environmental Sciences
> > http://www.envsci.rutgers.edu/~esertel/
> >
> > Res. and Teach. Assist. Elif SERTEL
> > Istanbul Technical University
> > Civil Engineering Faculty,
> > Remote Sensing Division
> > http://www.ins.itu.edu.tr/esertel/
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wrf-users mailing list
> > Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> > http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
> >
> > End of Wrf-users Digest, Vol 35, Issue 15
> > *****************************************
> >
> > !DSPAM:469fa6c2244332011861251!
>------- End of Original Message -------
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:09:34 -0500
> From: "Syed, Hazari I. (LARC-D318)[RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES CO]"
> <Hazari.I.Syed at nasa.gov>
>Subject: [Wrf-users] wrf.exe errors
>To: <wrf-users at ucar.edu>
>Message-ID:
> <3F1702251119794B998F6BE17423089480388A at NDMSEVS26.ndc.nasa.gov>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>I am getting this error when I run wrf.exe on our linux cluster. Can
>someone tell me what I am doing wrong? Are my namelist.input parameters
>incorrect?
>
>
>
>Your input in resolving this is appreciate. Thanks
>
>
>
>Hazari Syed
>
>
>
> d01 2005-11-05_16:33:00 152 points exceeded cfl=2 in domain
>d01 at time 2005-11-05_16:33:00 hours
>
> d01 2005-11-05_16:33:00 MAX AT i,j,k: 9 104
>19 cfl,w,d(eta)= 3.274115 -2.546333 3.2552510E-02
>
> d01 2005-11-05_16:33:00 139 points exceeded cfl=2 in domain
>d01 at time 2005-11-05_16:33:00 hours
>
> d01 2005-11-05_16:33:00 MAX AT i,j,k: 9 104
>19 cfl,w,d(eta)= 3.280104 -2.182799 3.2552510E-02
>
>Timing for main: time 2005-11-05_16:36:00 on domain 1: 3.73900
>elapsed seconds.
>
> d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00 277 points exceeded cfl=2 in domain
>d01 at time 2005-11-05_16:36:00 hours
>
> d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00 MAX AT i,j,k: 9 85
>15 cfl,w,d(eta)= 5.735764 -25.80292 4.9470633E-02
>
> d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00 343 points exceeded cfl=2 in domain
>d01 at time 2005-11-05_16:36:00 hours
>
> d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00 MAX AT i,j,k: 9 85
>14 cfl,w,d(eta)= 6.990264 -40.40704 5.4641724E-02
>
> d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00 285 points exceeded cfl=2 in domain
>d01 at time 2005-11-05_16:36:00 hours
>
> d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00 MAX AT i,j,k: 8 84
>16 cfl,w,d(eta)= 4.951917 -2.981738 4.4701487E-02
>
>Timing for main: time 2005-11-05_16:39:00 on domain 1: 3.48500
>elapsed seconds.
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 8
>78 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 9
>78 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 7
>79 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 8
>79 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 9
>79 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 10
>79 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 6
>80 NaN 5000.000
>
>.....
>
>.....
>
>
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 6
>87 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 7
>87 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 8
>87 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 9
>87 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 10
>87 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 11
>87 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 12
>87 NaN 5000.000
>
> WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN 13
>87 NaN 5000.000
>
>p0_3065: p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: http://newmailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20070719/ddfb89ce/attachment-0001.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:19:27 -0400
> From: "Kemp, Eric M." <Eric.Kemp at ngc.com>
>Subject: [Wrf-users] Bug fixes for ARWpost
>To: <wrf-users at ucar.edu>
>Message-ID: <52B67E1F32707847B44B4B7B1238E363020D5549 at xmbv3801>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>Dear wrf-users:
>
>I have started using the new ARWpost program version 1.0, released on June 19. In running ARWpost with the Intel compiler (ifort 9.1.043) on a Xeon cluster, I have found three bugs that cause the program to crash. (Curiously no problems are indicated when using pgf90 on an Opteron cluster).
>
>1. In input_module.F90, subroutine read_next_field, near line 97:
>
>Replace:
>
> IF ( ASSOCIATED(real_array) ) DEALLOCATE(real_array)
> IF ( ASSOCIATED(real_domain) ) DEALLOCATE(real_domain)
>
>with:
>
> IF ( ASSOCIATED(real_array) ) DEALLOCATE(real_array)
>! IF ( ASSOCIATED(real_domain) ) DEALLOCATE(real_domain)
> nullify(real_domain) ! Bug fix
>
>The bug is that real_array and real_domain point to the same target after read_next_field is called once. The first deallocate call will destroy the target for both pointers. Attempting to deallocate an unallocated target is illegal in Fortran 90.
>
>2. In input_module.F90, subroutine read_spec_field, near line 156:
>
>Replace:
>
> IF ( ASSOCIATED(real_domain) ) DEALLOCATE(real_domain)
> IF ( ASSOCIATED(real_array) ) DEALLOCATE(real_array)
>
>with:
>
>! IF ( ASSOCIATED(real_domain) ) DEALLOCATE(real_domain)
> nullify(real_domain) ! Bug fix
> IF ( ASSOCIATED(real_array) ) DEALLOCATE(real_array)
>
>This is the same type of bug at #1.
>
>3. In process_domain_module.F90, subroutine get_fields, near line 615.
>
>Replace:
>
> IF (cname(len_trim(cname)-1:len_trim(cname)) == "_U" ) CYCLE process_all_fields
> IF (cname(len_trim(cname)-1:len_trim(cname)) == "_V" ) CYCLE process_all_fields
>
>with:
>
> ! Bug fix
> if (len_trim(cname) >= 2) then
> IF (cname(len_trim(cname)-1:len_trim(cname)) == "_U" ) CYCLE process_all_fields
> IF (cname(len_trim(cname)-1:len_trim(cname)) == "_V" ) CYCLE process_all_fields
> end if
> ! End bug fix
>
>The bug is that several variables in the wrfout files have one character names (e.g., "U", "V", "W"). For those variables, len_trim(cname) returns 1, and the if statements try to evaluate cname(0:1), which is out of bounds.
>
>Eric Kemp
>Northrop Grumman Corporation/TASC
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: http://newmailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20070720/336f1913/attachment.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Wrf-users mailing list
>Wrf-users at ucar.edu
>http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>
>
>End of Wrf-users Digest, Vol 35, Issue 16
>*****************************************
ASHISH ROUTRAY
Project Scientist & Research Scholar
Centre for Atmospheric Sciences
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Hauz Khas
New Delhi-110016
India
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20070721/5e8b9b9b/attachment.html
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list