[Wrf-users] wrf.exe errors

[Syed, Hazari I. (LARC-D318)[RAYTHEON TECHNICAL SERVICES CO]]

I am getting this error when I run wrf.exe on our linux cluster.  Can
someone tell me what I am doing wrong? Are my namelist.input parameters
incorrect?

 

Your input in resolving this is appreciate. Thanks

 

Hazari Syed

 

 d01 2005-11-05_16:33:00           152  points exceeded cfl=2 in domain
d01 at time 2005-11-05_16:33:00 hours

 d01 2005-11-05_16:33:00  MAX AT i,j,k:             9          104
19  cfl,w,d(eta)=    3.274115       -2.546333       3.2552510E-02

 d01 2005-11-05_16:33:00           139  points exceeded cfl=2 in domain
d01 at time 2005-11-05_16:33:00 hours

 d01 2005-11-05_16:33:00  MAX AT i,j,k:             9          104
19  cfl,w,d(eta)=    3.280104       -2.182799       3.2552510E-02

Timing for main: time 2005-11-05_16:36:00 on domain   1:    3.73900
elapsed seconds.

 d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00           277  points exceeded cfl=2 in domain
d01 at time 2005-11-05_16:36:00 hours

 d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00  MAX AT i,j,k:             9           85
15  cfl,w,d(eta)=    5.735764       -25.80292       4.9470633E-02

 d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00           343  points exceeded cfl=2 in domain
d01 at time 2005-11-05_16:36:00 hours

 d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00  MAX AT i,j,k:             9           85
14  cfl,w,d(eta)=    6.990264       -40.40704       5.4641724E-02

 d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00           285  points exceeded cfl=2 in domain
d01 at time 2005-11-05_16:36:00 hours

 d01 2005-11-05_16:36:00  MAX AT i,j,k:             8           84
16  cfl,w,d(eta)=    4.951917       -2.981738       4.4701487E-02

Timing for main: time 2005-11-05_16:39:00 on domain   1:    3.48500
elapsed seconds.

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN            8
78             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN            9
78             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN            7
79             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN            8
79             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN            9
79             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN           10
79             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN            6
80             NaN    5000.000

.....

.....

 

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN            6
87             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN            7
87             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN            8
87             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN            9
87             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN           10
87             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN           11
87             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN           12
87             NaN    5000.000

  WOULD GO OFF TOP: KF_ETA_PARA I,J,DPTHMX,DPMIN           13
87             NaN    5000.000

p0_3065:  p4_error: interrupt SIGSEGV: 11 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20070719/ddfb89ce/attachment.html