[Wrf-users] DX & DY did not match with input
ashish no routray
ashishroutray at rediffmail.com
Sun Jan 22 21:33:32 MST 2006
Dear Sam
The error shows that you did mistake in your namelist.input file.
The resolution DX and Dy are not match with your input that is wrfsi_em_real.... file.
Just check your wrfsi.nl file and put same DX and DY in your namelist.input file.
I hope it may be solve your problem.
All the Best
Ashish Routray
IIT Delhi
India
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 wrf-users-request at ucar.edu wrote :
>Send Wrf-users mailing list submissions to
> wrf-users at ucar.edu
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> wrf-users-owner at ucar.edu
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Wrf-users digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 4 (Y. Yamasaki)
> 2. Input error or fluke ? (Sam Drinkard)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:21:16 +0000
> From: "Y. Yamasaki" <yamasaki at fis.ua.pt>
>Subject: [Wrf-users] Re: Wrf-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 4
>To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
>Message-ID: <web-6956653 at controller.cgpmail.ua.pt>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
>
>Hi !
>It seems to me that you are using too small domain (I
>suppose that you are running the model using GFS grib2
>data with no nesting ). Why dont'you try to increese the
>size of your domain.
>good luck
>yy
>
>Em Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:01:20 -0700
> wrf-users-request at ucar.edu escreveu:
> > Send Wrf-users mailing list submissions to
> > wrf-users at ucar.edu
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> >visit
> > http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> >'help' to
> > wrf-users-request at ucar.edu
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > wrf-users-owner at ucar.edu
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is
> >more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Wrf-users digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Near Surface Temperatures (Sam Drinkard)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:50:54 -0500
> >From: Sam Drinkard <sam at wa4phy.net>
> > Subject: [Wrf-users] Near Surface Temperatures
> > To: wrf-users at ucar.edu
> > Message-ID: <43CFDF8E.2010307 at wa4phy.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> >format=flowed
> >
> > List:
> >
> > I've got WRF v.2.1 up and running real data, but I am
> >not impressed
> > with near surface or surface temperatures. I typically
> >see in my
> > domain(s) anywhere from 5, to as much as 10 degrees
> >difference between
> > observed and forecast. I'm curious if this is something
> >everyone has to
> > deal with, or if perhaps something in my setup is
> >causing these
> > discrepancies. The largest temp difference usually
> >occurs in the
> > afternoons, and WRF is running on average, 7-9 degrees
> >too cool. In the
> > mornings, the model is not picking up on the low temps
> >either, but
> > errors on the order of 2-3 degrees are common. I can
> >live with that.
> > The current setup for the inner domain is 12km, 34
> >levels, the lower
> > ones being 1.000, 0.999, 0.997, and 0.994. The rest
> >above that are
> > defaults from SI. The model is initialized via the NAM.
> >
> > As for physics, the run is set with::
> >
> > mp_physics=5 (Ferrier (new ETA))
> > ra_lw = 1, (rrtm scheme), radt = 33
> > sf_sfclay_physics = 2 (Monin-Obukhov)
> > sf_surface_physics = 2 (Noah LSM)
> > bl_pbl_physics = 2 (Mellor_Yamada_Janjic)
> > cu_physics = 1 (Kain-Fritsch)
> >
> > I've played around with various schemes trying to find a
> >mixture of
> > things that would help bring surface temps in line with
> >where they
> > should be, but no combinations I've tried have made any
> >significant
> > difference. About the only thing I can see that does
> >appear to be
> > mostly correct is the surface temp of the Clark Hill
> >lake, approx 15nm
> > north of me. I do see as much as 5-7 degrees difference
> >at times over
> > water, vs land.
> >
> > I'd appreciate very much if someone has some suggestions
> >to try or
> > anything that might help get surface temps in line.
> >
> > Graciously thanking you,
> >
> >
> > Sam
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wrf-users mailing list
> > Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> > http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
> >
> >
> > End of Wrf-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 4
> > ****************************************
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:29:39 -0500
> From: Sam Drinkard <sam at wa4phy.net>
>Subject: [Wrf-users] Input error or fluke ?
>To: wrf-users at ucar.edu, rcgillia at yahoo.com
>Message-ID: <1137947379.3952.24.camel at thunder.wa4phy.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>I've captured this error text below from the rsl.error.0000 file on
>several occasions, but it appears only on startup. One WRF starts
>running, you can't find this message in the rsl.error.0000 file. I
>assume it gets overwritten by something. Is this something that needs
>to be fixed, or exactly what is going on. The model runs, and there are
>no other errors in any other places that I'm aware of. I could not find
>any file called "input_wrf.b".
>
>in input_aux_model_input1 : config_flags%io_form_auxinput1 2
>calling input_wrf
>in input_aux_model_input1 : config_flags%io_form_auxinput1 2
>calling input_wrf
>-------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
>FATAL CALLED FROM FILE: input_wrf.b LINE: 112
>DX and DY do not match from the namelist and the input file
>-------------------------------------------
>[0] MPI Abort by user Aborting program !
>[0] Aborting program!
>
>Any pointers or help appreciated
>
>Regards,
>
>Sam
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20060122/a1ae09a0/attachment-0001.htm
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Wrf-users mailing list
>Wrf-users at ucar.edu
>http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>
>
>End of Wrf-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 5
>****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20060123/2b3e77be/attachment.html
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list