[Wrf-users] trouble with 2-way nest
John Krasting
krasting at cep.rutgers.edu
Mon Oct 17 08:53:57 MDT 2005
I can't help you very much, but I encountered the problem with a
12km/4km two way nested run using GFS data. I also played with the
time step by it didn't help. I changed my resolution to 15km/5km and
the problem resolved. I never figured out why WRF didn't like the
12km/4km configuration.
-John
On 10/17/05, mpborkow at ncsu.edu <mpborkow at ncsu.edu> wrote:
> I am running a two-way nest, 12km outer domain with a 4km inner domain
> using a NARR dataset. The setup seems to be fine but I am having trouble
> with the model run itself. I do get one ouput file for each domain for
> the initialization time only. The SLP from these output files match up
> well with the reanalysis data in some spots, in other spots the SLP seems
> very artificial with the isobars looking erratic. Here is a sampling of
> the errors I am getting:
>
> Timing for Writing wrfout_d01_2004-03-16_00:00:00 for domain 1:
> 21.71200 elapsed seconds.
> Timing for processing lateral boundary for domain 1: 5.28800
> elapsed seconds.
> WRF NUMBER OF TILES = 1
> 90190 points exceeded cfl in w_damp
> (module_big_step_utilities_em.F)
> MAX AT i,j,k: 174 60 30 cfl,w,d(eta)=
> nan nan 2.1000000E-02
> Timing for Writing wrfout_d02_2004-03-16_00:00:00 for domain 2:
> 18.27400 elapsed seconds.
> WRF NUMBER OF TILES = 1
> 21257 points exceeded cfl in w_damp
> (module_big_step_utilities_em.F)
> MAX AT i,j,k: 5 55 30 cfl,w,d(eta)=
> nan 3.5428979E-02 2.1000000E-02
> 41992 points exceeded cfl in w_damp
> (module_big_step_utilities_em.F)
> MAX AT i,j,k: 10 55 30 cfl,w,d(eta)=
> nan 5.5973802E-02 2.1000000E-02
>
> -------------- FATAL CALLED ---------------
> FATAL CALLED FROM FILE: module_cu_kfeta.b LINE: 2054
> KAIN-FRITSCH, istop=1, diags
> -------------------------------------------
> [4] MPI Abort by user Aborting program !
> [4] Aborting program!
>
>
> My first thought was that it was a time step issue, but my time step is
> set at 60s for the 12km domain, 20s for the 4km domain. I did try
> reducing them to 48s and 16s, but this did not solve the problem. Given
> the final error, looks like there may be some error with the KAIN-FRITSCH
> scheme, which I only have running on the 12km domain. Does anyone have
> any thoughts as to what the problem may be? Thanks!
>
> -Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wrf-users mailing list
> Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>
--
****************************************************
John Krasting
Center for Environmental Prediction
Rutgers University
14 College Farm Road
New Brunswick, NJ USA 08901-8551
Phone: +1-732-932-3890
Fax: +1-732-932-8644
****************************************************
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list