<div dir="ltr">that makes sense. thanks.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 4:58 PM Dave Allured - NOAA Affiliate <<a href="mailto:dave.allured@noaa.gov">dave.allured@noaa.gov</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Okay. That will work, but it will draw the first bin asymmetric with respect to the rest of the polygon, except when pdfib(0) = 0. For very small pdfib(0), the asymmetry will not be noticeable. For a true horizontal edge at the base of each polygon, you should include the extra coordinate pair like I showed before.</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 2:20 PM Adam Herrington <<a href="mailto:adam.herrington@stonybrook.edu" target="_blank">adam.herrington@stonybrook.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">You're right, they are not closed contours. I forced them closed through<div><br></div><div> xib = new( (/2*nbins/), "double")<br> yib = new( (/2*nbins/), "double")<br> ...<br> xib(0) = xib(2*nbins-1)<br> yib(0) = yib(2*nbins-1)<br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks a lot Dave! I'll be presenting this plot at cesm workshop on wednesday if you're curious of what it means.</div><div><br></div><div>Adam</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 8:18 AM Dave Allured - NOAA Affiliate <<a href="mailto:dave.allured@noaa.gov" target="_blank">dave.allured@noaa.gov</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Very nice plots. Notice how those mystery lines fade as they approach (0,0). That is because they are polygons, not lines. Specifically, long skinny triangles. That is a clue.</div><div><br></div><div>xib and yib are not closed contours. I am not sure whether gsn_add_polygon is supposed to close them for you. But since this seems to coincide with the visible anomalies, try closing them explicitly.<br><br> xib = new( (/2*nbins+1/), "double")<br> yib = new( (/2*nbins+1/), "double")<br> ...<br> xib(2*nbins) = xib(0)<br> yib(2*nbins) = yib(0)</div></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 7:59 PM Adam Herrington via ncl-talk <<a href="mailto:ncl-talk@mailman.ucar.edu" target="_blank">ncl-talk@mailman.ucar.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I'm attempting to compute a raw violin-type plot. This is similar to a box plot, but I'm drawing a polygon around the pdf, and I close the polygon through a mirror image (-1*probability). Then I rotate it so it's vertical, and align it with the x-axis "id" of the box plot.<div><br></div><div>If you're not following, I don't blame you ... this is hard to describe. Attached is my attempt at this that will hopefully clarify what I'm trying to do.</div><div><br></div><div>**digression before I go on to details on my primary issue**</div><div>I'd like to experiment with an actual violin plot, with a smoothed kernel density estimate of the distribution. The routine <a href="https://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Document/Functions/Built-in/kde_n_test.shtml" target="_blank">kde_n_test</a> should work, but the warnings on the ncl page say the function is under construction. Is that the latest update for this function?</div><div>**end digression**</div><div><br></div><div>You'll notice for panels 2 and 3 there is a line pivoting from the bottom of the pdf's to the (0,0) point on the plot. I'm having trouble tracking down why this occurs and how to fix it. I'm going to copy-paste the relevant portions of the code for one of the x-value id's.</div><div><br></div><div> dx = 0.4d0 ;; x-depth of the pdf<br> xvals = (/1.,2.,3.,4.,5.,6./) ;; case id<br></div><div>...</div><div> pdfib = pdfx(ibdiff,nbins,optpdf)<br> pdfib = pdfib/max(pdfib)<br><br> xib = new( (/2*nbins/), "double")<br> yib = new( (/2*nbins/), "double")<br><br> xib(0:nbins-1) = xvals(n) - dx*pdfib<br> xib(nbins:2*nbins-1) = xvals(n) + dx*pdfib(nbins-1:0)<br> yib(0:nbins-1) = pdfib@bin_center<br> yib(nbins:2*nbins-1) = pdfib@bin_center(nbins-1:0)<br></div><div><br></div><div> pgstr = unique_string("dum")<br> plot@$pgstr$ = gsn_add_polygon(wks,plot(0),xib,yib,respg)<br></div><div><br></div><div>I am pretty sure the xib and yib are a closed contour.. they go from 0:nbins-1 and then nbins:2*nbins-1 ... Would like to get another set of eyes on this though</div><div><br></div><div>thanks,</div><div>Adam</div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>