[ncl-talk] plotting country outline with shapefiles

S Br sbr.climate at gmail.com
Tue Jan 5 13:40:23 MST 2021


Hi Rick,
Thanks for trying.
I am using the same shapefile_utils.ncl across the two machines.
As you suggest, I have tried the command in both machines and it looks like
x/y coordinates are swapped in maschine #2 as shown below.

*machine #1*
(0)     -0.1916935366010736 51.34212550232069
(1)     -0.1918504471635003 51.34216369759741
(2)     -0.1919426195340767 51.3421861363549
.
.
.
(25817) -0.1912990774713476 51.34202950288345
(25818) -0.1916318559031973 51.34211049447309
(25819) -0.1916935366010736 51.34212550232069

*machine #2*
(0)     51.34212549581116 -0.1916934955276336
(1)     51.34216369108803 -0.1918504060899556
(2)     51.34218612984562 -0.1919425784604706
.
.
.
(25817) 51.34202949637353 -0.1912990363981704
(25818) 51.34211048796352 -0.1916318148297985
(25819) 51.34212549581116 -0.1916934955276336



On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 7:11 PM Rick Brownrigg <brownrig at ucar.edu> wrote:

> Well this is truly bizarre. There's nothing I can think of that would or
> should account for the lat/lon coordinate swapping between the two machines
> (unless the shapefile_utils.ncl files are different across the two
> machines). Things work as expected for me. Unfortunately, without access to
> something like machine #2 that exhibits the behavior, I personally have no
> way of drilling down further to find out what the problem is.
>
> Not that this helps solve the problem, but I'm curious if the x/y
> coordinates are really juxtaposed; on machine #2:
>
>      f=addfile("file_gor_2011.shp","r")
>      print(f->x + " " + f->y)
>
> Do those values look like they are swapped?
>
> I wish I had a better answer for you :-/
>
> Rick
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:37 AM S Br <sbr.climate at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rick,
>> The below are the details.
>>
>> uname -a
>> Computer#1
>> Linux sbclim 4.15.0-128-generic #131-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 9 06:57:35 UTC
>> 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> Computer#2
>> Linux sbclim 3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 25 17:23:54 UTC
>> 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> ls -l file_gor_2011.shp
>> Computer#1
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 climdir env 413276 Dec  8 16:11 file_gor_2011.shp
>> Computer#2
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 climdir users 413276 Jan  5 10:54 file_gor_2011.shp
>>
>> Please find attached here the shape files.
>>
>> Thanks
>> SB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:37 PM Rick Brownrigg <brownrig at ucar.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> That result is very strange indeed. What are computers 1 and 2, i.e.,
>>> what is the output of:
>>>
>>>    uname -a
>>>
>>> And just to be certain, what is the output of this on each computer:
>>>
>>>   cd ...to-directory-where-file_gor_2011.shp-resides....
>>>   ls -l file_gor_2011.shp
>>>
>>> Finally, can you send me file_gor_2011.shp (recall that means the .sph,
>>> .shx, .dbf files)?
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 5:53 AM S Br via ncl-talk <
>>> ncl-talk at mailman.ucar.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>> I have now compared the diagnostic results between the two computers
>>>> and the below are the results.
>>>> *Computer#1:*
>>>> (0)
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>> (0) Filename: "file_gor_2011.shp"
>>>> (0)   Geometry type: polygon
>>>> (0)   # of features: 1
>>>> (0)   Min/max lat:     51.29/  51.69
>>>> (0)   Min/max lon:     -0.51/   0.33
>>>> (0)   Variable names and their types:
>>>> (0)       geometry : integer
>>>> (0)       segments : integer
>>>> (0)       x : double
>>>> (0)       y : double
>>>> (0)       label : string
>>>> (0)       name : string
>>>> (0)       code : string
>>>> (0)
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>> *Computer#2:*
>>>> (0)
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>> (0) Filename: "file_gor_2011.shp"
>>>> (0)   Geometry type: polygon
>>>> (0)   # of features: 1
>>>> (0)   Min/max lat:     -0.51/   0.33
>>>> (0)   Min/max lon:     51.29/  51.69
>>>> (0)   Variable names and their types:
>>>> (0)       geometry : integer
>>>> (0)       segments : integer
>>>> (0)       x : double
>>>> (0)       y : double
>>>> (0)       label : string
>>>> (0)       name : string
>>>> (0)       code : string
>>>> (0)
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> I could see in one computer (computer#2 above) that the latitude values
>>>> are replacing the longitude values and vice versa, and that may be the
>>>> reason the country outlines are not displaying here.
>>>>
>>>> Could you please suggest how to solve this issue? I am using the same
>>>> data, scripts and only difference is the computer.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> SB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 5:30 PM Dave Allured - NOAA Affiliate <
>>>> dave.allured at noaa.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It would be better to apply debugging techniques to narrow down the
>>>>> problem, rather than to speculate as to the cause.  Use *addfile* to
>>>>> see if NCL can read the shapefile.  Use diagnostic print statements to
>>>>> examine the shapefile structure in memory.  Use *gsn_add_polygon* to
>>>>> see if NCL can draw a simple outline.
>>>>>
>>>>> To understand the structure, refer to the shapefile documentation at
>>>>> the top of the NCL shapefiles example page.  That mentions a special
>>>>> procedure *print_shapefile_info* which will print additional useful
>>>>> details.  Compare diagnostic results between your two computers.  Good luck.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:16 AM S Br via ncl-talk <
>>>>> ncl-talk at mailman.ucar.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> I am trying to plot a figure using the shapefile. Everything is
>>>>>> working fine with the NCL script but it doesn't draw the country outline
>>>>>> given as a shapefiles. However, the same script works fine in another
>>>>>> computer and draws the required country outline using the shapefile.
>>>>>> What could be the possible reason that the NCL script works fine but
>>>>>> fails to draw the country outline using shapefiles without showing any
>>>>>> error?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Both the computers are installed with the NCL 6.6.2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>> SB
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ncl-talk mailing list
>>>> ncl-talk at mailman.ucar.edu
>>>> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:
>>>> https://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/ncl-talk/attachments/20210105/d25a4554/attachment.html>


More information about the ncl-talk mailing list