[Met_help] [rt.rap.ucar.edu #93503] History for METviewer date picker
Tatiana Burek via RT
met_help at ucar.edu
Fri Dec 20 07:41:55 MST 2019
----------------------------------------------------------------
Initial Request
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hello. Attached are screenshots illustrating the problem we discussed at
the METplus users' meeting today in re date picker seemingly not working
correctly:
- Screenshot.png: I set "forecast valid time" to begin on 00Z
2019-11-19, ending on 21Z 2019-12-14, with 3 hour increment, then hit
"select values"
- Screenshot-2.png: looks like all possible valid times got selected
- Screenshot-3.png: go back to the date picker. The date range seems to
cover all dates in the database. Hour increment is huge (though not as
large as that between the oldest date and newest in the database)
- Screenshot-4.png: xml file shows fcst_valid_beg entries that agree
with Screenshots 2 and 3, not what I originally set in Screenshot.png.
Thank you very much for your help -
Ying
---
Ying Lin
NCEP/EMC/Verification, Post-processing and Product Generation Branch
NCWCP Cubicle No. 2015
Ying.Lin at noaa.gov
----------------------------------------------------------------
Complete Ticket History
----------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: METviewer date picker
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Tue Dec 17 15:56:09 2019
Hi Ying,
Thanks for sending the detailed steps. Unfortunately, when Tatiana
and I
follow these steps, we do not see the behavior you describe.
Here's what I did:
(1) Go to: https://metviewer.nws.noaa.gov/metviewer1.jsp
(2) Select database "NCEP_ylin -> mv_ylin_metplus".
(3) In "Y1 Axis variables", for "APCP_03" select "FBIAS".
(4) In "Y1 Series Variables", for "MODEL" select "HRRR" and "HRRRX".
(5) In "Fixed Values"...
For "VX_MASK" select "CONUS".
For "OBS_THRESH" select ">2.54".
For "INIT_HOUR" select "00,06,12,18".
For "FCST_VALID_BEG" use the date picker to select from "2019-11-19
00:00:00" to "2019-12-14 21:00:00" every 3 hours.
But here's the big difference. That results in 208 check marks:
FCST_VALID_BEG 208 selected.
*Your screenshot says 559 selected, not 208.*
When I completed making the plot and check the resulting XML, I did
indeed
find 208 dates listed.
So what could explain this discrepancy? One possibility is that
perhaps
the browser has previously cached some information which causes 559 to
be
selected, instead of 208?
After you use the date picker, when you click on the dropdown list of
dates... are there any dates checked that do NOT fall inside the
specified
date range?
You could try clearing your browser cache to see if the behavior
differs.
John
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 3:18 PM Ying Lin via RT <met_help at ucar.edu>
wrote:
>
> Mon Dec 16 15:17:25 2019: Request 93503 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by ying.lin at noaa.gov
> Queue: met_help
> Subject: METviewer date picker
> Owner: Nobody
> Requestors: ying.lin at noaa.gov
> Status: new
> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=93503 >
>
>
> Hello. Attached are screenshots illustrating the problem we
discussed at
> the METplus users' meeting today in re date picker seemingly not
working
> correctly:
>
>
> - Screenshot.png: I set "forecast valid time" to begin on 00Z
> 2019-11-19, ending on 21Z 2019-12-14, with 3 hour increment, then
hit
> "select values"
> - Screenshot-2.png: looks like all possible valid times got
selected
> - Screenshot-3.png: go back to the date picker. The date range
seems to
> cover all dates in the database. Hour increment is huge (though
not as
> large as that between the oldest date and newest in the database)
> - Screenshot-4.png: xml file shows fcst_valid_beg entries that
agree
> with Screenshots 2 and 3, not what I originally set in
Screenshot.png.
>
> Thank you very much for your help -
>
> Ying
>
> ---
> Ying Lin
> NCEP/EMC/Verification, Post-processing and Product Generation Branch
> NCWCP Cubicle No. 2015
> Ying.Lin at noaa.gov
>
>
------------------------------------------------
Subject: METviewer date picker
From: Ying Lin
Time: Tue Dec 17 20:17:04 2019
Thanks John. I'll try cleaning the browser when I'm back to the
office
Thur.
Ying
---
Ying Lin
NCEP/EMC/Verification, Post-processing and Product Generation Branch
NCWCP Cubicle No. 2015
Ying.Lin at noaa.gov
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:56 PM John Halley Gotway via RT
<met_help at ucar.edu>
wrote:
> Hi Ying,
>
> Thanks for sending the detailed steps. Unfortunately, when Tatiana
and I
> follow these steps, we do not see the behavior you describe.
>
> Here's what I did:
> (1) Go to: https://metviewer.nws.noaa.gov/metviewer1.jsp
> (2) Select database "NCEP_ylin -> mv_ylin_metplus".
> (3) In "Y1 Axis variables", for "APCP_03" select "FBIAS".
> (4) In "Y1 Series Variables", for "MODEL" select "HRRR" and "HRRRX".
> (5) In "Fixed Values"...
> For "VX_MASK" select "CONUS".
> For "OBS_THRESH" select ">2.54".
> For "INIT_HOUR" select "00,06,12,18".
> For "FCST_VALID_BEG" use the date picker to select from "2019-11-
19
> 00:00:00" to "2019-12-14 21:00:00" every 3 hours.
>
> But here's the big difference. That results in 208 check marks:
> FCST_VALID_BEG 208 selected.
>
> *Your screenshot says 559 selected, not 208.*
>
> When I completed making the plot and check the resulting XML, I did
indeed
> find 208 dates listed.
>
> So what could explain this discrepancy? One possibility is that
perhaps
> the browser has previously cached some information which causes 559
to be
> selected, instead of 208?
>
> After you use the date picker, when you click on the dropdown list
of
> dates... are there any dates checked that do NOT fall inside the
specified
> date range?
>
> You could try clearing your browser cache to see if the behavior
differs.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 3:18 PM Ying Lin via RT <met_help at ucar.edu>
wrote:
>
> >
> > Mon Dec 16 15:17:25 2019: Request 93503 was acted upon.
> > Transaction: Ticket created by ying.lin at noaa.gov
> > Queue: met_help
> > Subject: METviewer date picker
> > Owner: Nobody
> > Requestors: ying.lin at noaa.gov
> > Status: new
> > Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=93503 >
> >
> >
> > Hello. Attached are screenshots illustrating the problem we
discussed
> at
> > the METplus users' meeting today in re date picker seemingly not
working
> > correctly:
> >
> >
> > - Screenshot.png: I set "forecast valid time" to begin on 00Z
> > 2019-11-19, ending on 21Z 2019-12-14, with 3 hour increment,
then hit
> > "select values"
> > - Screenshot-2.png: looks like all possible valid times got
selected
> > - Screenshot-3.png: go back to the date picker. The date range
seems
> to
> > cover all dates in the database. Hour increment is huge
(though not
> as
> > large as that between the oldest date and newest in the
database)
> > - Screenshot-4.png: xml file shows fcst_valid_beg entries that
agree
> > with Screenshots 2 and 3, not what I originally set in
Screenshot.png.
> >
> > Thank you very much for your help -
> >
> > Ying
> >
> > ---
> > Ying Lin
> > NCEP/EMC/Verification, Post-processing and Product Generation
Branch
> > NCWCP Cubicle No. 2015
> > Ying.Lin at noaa.gov
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------------------------
Subject: METviewer date picker
From: Ying Lin
Time: Thu Dec 19 20:29:55 2019
Hi John,
You're right, clearing cookies on the old browser or starting from
a
brand new browser that had not been used before to access the AWS
METviewer
server both worked. Thank you very much for your help. Please close
this
ticket at your convenience.
Ying
---
Ying Lin
NCEP/EMC/Verification, Post-processing and Product Generation Branch
NCWCP Cubicle No. 2015
Ying.Lin at noaa.gov
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:16 PM Ying Lin - NOAA Federal
<ying.lin at noaa.gov>
wrote:
> Thanks John. I'll try cleaning the browser when I'm back to the
office
> Thur.
> Ying
> ---
> Ying Lin
> NCEP/EMC/Verification, Post-processing and Product Generation Branch
> NCWCP Cubicle No. 2015
> Ying.Lin at noaa.gov
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:56 PM John Halley Gotway via RT <
> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ying,
>>
>> Thanks for sending the detailed steps. Unfortunately, when Tatiana
and I
>> follow these steps, we do not see the behavior you describe.
>>
>> Here's what I did:
>> (1) Go to: https://metviewer.nws.noaa.gov/metviewer1.jsp
>> (2) Select database "NCEP_ylin -> mv_ylin_metplus".
>> (3) In "Y1 Axis variables", for "APCP_03" select "FBIAS".
>> (4) In "Y1 Series Variables", for "MODEL" select "HRRR" and
"HRRRX".
>> (5) In "Fixed Values"...
>> For "VX_MASK" select "CONUS".
>> For "OBS_THRESH" select ">2.54".
>> For "INIT_HOUR" select "00,06,12,18".
>> For "FCST_VALID_BEG" use the date picker to select from "2019-
11-19
>> 00:00:00" to "2019-12-14 21:00:00" every 3 hours.
>>
>> But here's the big difference. That results in 208 check marks:
>> FCST_VALID_BEG 208 selected.
>>
>> *Your screenshot says 559 selected, not 208.*
>>
>> When I completed making the plot and check the resulting XML, I did
indeed
>> find 208 dates listed.
>>
>> So what could explain this discrepancy? One possibility is that
perhaps
>> the browser has previously cached some information which causes 559
to be
>> selected, instead of 208?
>>
>> After you use the date picker, when you click on the dropdown list
of
>> dates... are there any dates checked that do NOT fall inside the
specified
>> date range?
>>
>> You could try clearing your browser cache to see if the behavior
differs.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 3:18 PM Ying Lin via RT <met_help at ucar.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Mon Dec 16 15:17:25 2019: Request 93503 was acted upon.
>> > Transaction: Ticket created by ying.lin at noaa.gov
>> > Queue: met_help
>> > Subject: METviewer date picker
>> > Owner: Nobody
>> > Requestors: ying.lin at noaa.gov
>> > Status: new
>> > Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=93503 >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hello. Attached are screenshots illustrating the problem we
discussed
>> at
>> > the METplus users' meeting today in re date picker seemingly not
working
>> > correctly:
>> >
>> >
>> > - Screenshot.png: I set "forecast valid time" to begin on 00Z
>> > 2019-11-19, ending on 21Z 2019-12-14, with 3 hour increment,
then hit
>> > "select values"
>> > - Screenshot-2.png: looks like all possible valid times got
selected
>> > - Screenshot-3.png: go back to the date picker. The date
range
>> seems to
>> > cover all dates in the database. Hour increment is huge
(though not
>> as
>> > large as that between the oldest date and newest in the
database)
>> > - Screenshot-4.png: xml file shows fcst_valid_beg entries that
agree
>> > with Screenshots 2 and 3, not what I originally set in
>> Screenshot.png.
>> >
>> > Thank you very much for your help -
>> >
>> > Ying
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Ying Lin
>> > NCEP/EMC/Verification, Post-processing and Product Generation
Branch
>> > NCWCP Cubicle No. 2015
>> > Ying.Lin at noaa.gov
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------
More information about the Met_help
mailing list