[Met_help] [rt.rap.ucar.edu #86554] History for METviewer 2.6 issues?
John Halley Gotway via RT
met_help at ucar.edu
Fri Aug 10 14:17:54 MDT 2018
----------------------------------------------------------------
Initial Request
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
I had been making reliability diagrams using v2.5 without issue, but with
the upgrade to v2.6 I'm getting this warning:
==== Start Rscript error ==== Warning message: In if (is.na(listStat)) { :
the condition has length > 1 and only the first element will be used ====
End Rscript error ====
The plot generally looks normal except it has a gap in the middle of the
curves (at 0.45 on x-axis).
Does this change in behavior make sense based on the v2.6 changes - maybe
the inclusion of confidence intervals? Is there something I can try
changing to avoid this issue?
ROC curves give me the same warning and no data plotted, but I have less
experience making that plot type.
Thanks,
Matt
----------------------------------------------------------------
Complete Ticket History
----------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: METviewer 2.6 issues?
From: John Halley Gotway
Time: Fri Aug 10 12:39:58 2018
Matt,
Thanks for letting us know about this change in behavior in mv2.6.
Tatiana
looked into it and found that the hole was caused by no values falling
in
that particular probability bin. Previous versions of METviewer
connected
the reliability line across that NA value, but mv2.6 plotted it as a
"hole". Tatiana just fixed it and redeployed mv2.6. Please try
running
again and confirm that:
(1) The warning message is gone and (2) the lines of the
reliability
diagram now connect across that NA value.
mv2.6 includes some code consolidation and cleanup and this small
change
was likely an unintended consequence of that. Fortunately, it was
very
easy to fix.
Please let us know if you have other questions or encounter any
unexpected
behavior.
Thanks,
John
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:29 AM matthew.pyle at noaa.gov via RT <
met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
> Fri Aug 10 11:28:37 2018: Request 86554 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by Matthew.Pyle at noaa.gov
> Queue: met_help
> Subject: METviewer 2.6 issues?
> Owner: Nobody
> Requestors: Matthew.Pyle at noaa.gov
> Status: new
> Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=86554 >
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I had been making reliability diagrams using v2.5 without issue, but
with
> the upgrade to v2.6 I'm getting this warning:
>
> ==== Start Rscript error ==== Warning message: In if
(is.na(listStat)) { :
> the condition has length > 1 and only the first element will be used
====
> End Rscript error ====
>
> The plot generally looks normal except it has a gap in the middle of
the
> curves (at 0.45 on x-axis).
>
> Does this change in behavior make sense based on the v2.6 changes -
maybe
> the inclusion of confidence intervals? Is there something I can try
> changing to avoid this issue?
>
> ROC curves give me the same warning and no data plotted, but I have
less
> experience making that plot type.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
------------------------------------------------
Subject: METviewer 2.6 issues?
From: "matthew.pyle at noaa.gov"
Time: Fri Aug 10 13:03:54 2018
Hi John/Tatiana,
Thanks for the quick response. It does eliminate the warning message
and
the gap with reliability , BUT...
now it seems to be unable to plot multiple models simultaneously.
Plotting
each model individually looks fine (and fills in the gap as needed).
I'm
not seeing any warnings/errors why only one model is actually plotted.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:39 PM, John Halley Gotway via RT <
met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Thanks for letting us know about this change in behavior in mv2.6.
Tatiana
> looked into it and found that the hole was caused by no values
falling in
> that particular probability bin. Previous versions of METviewer
connected
> the reliability line across that NA value, but mv2.6 plotted it as a
> "hole". Tatiana just fixed it and redeployed mv2.6. Please try
running
> again and confirm that:
> (1) The warning message is gone and (2) the lines of the
reliability
> diagram now connect across that NA value.
>
> mv2.6 includes some code consolidation and cleanup and this small
change
> was likely an unintended consequence of that. Fortunately, it was
very
> easy to fix.
>
> Please let us know if you have other questions or encounter any
unexpected
> behavior.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:29 AM matthew.pyle at noaa.gov via RT <
> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> > Fri Aug 10 11:28:37 2018: Request 86554 was acted upon.
> > Transaction: Ticket created by Matthew.Pyle at noaa.gov
> > Queue: met_help
> > Subject: METviewer 2.6 issues?
> > Owner: Nobody
> > Requestors: Matthew.Pyle at noaa.gov
> > Status: new
> > Ticket <URL:
https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=86554 >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had been making reliability diagrams using v2.5 without issue,
but with
> > the upgrade to v2.6 I'm getting this warning:
> >
> > ==== Start Rscript error ==== Warning message: In if
(is.na(listStat))
> { :
> > the condition has length > 1 and only the first element will be
used ====
> > End Rscript error ====
> >
> > The plot generally looks normal except it has a gap in the middle
of the
> > curves (at 0.45 on x-axis).
> >
> > Does this change in behavior make sense based on the v2.6 changes
- maybe
> > the inclusion of confidence intervals? Is there something I can
try
> > changing to avoid this issue?
> >
> > ROC curves give me the same warning and no data plotted, but I
have less
> > experience making that plot type.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------------------------
Subject: METviewer 2.6 issues?
From: Tatiana Burek
Time: Fri Aug 10 13:20:25 2018
Mat,
I apply another fix that should allow you to plot multiple models
simultaneously.
Tatiana
On Fri Aug 10 13:03:54 2018, Matthew.Pyle at noaa.gov wrote:
> Hi John/Tatiana,
>
> Thanks for the quick response. It does eliminate the warning
message
> and
> the gap with reliability , BUT...
>
> now it seems to be unable to plot multiple models simultaneously.
> Plotting
> each model individually looks fine (and fills in the gap as needed).
> I'm
> not seeing any warnings/errors why only one model is actually
plotted.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:39 PM, John Halley Gotway via RT <
> met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
>
> > Matt,
> >
> > Thanks for letting us know about this change in behavior in mv2.6.
> > Tatiana
> > looked into it and found that the hole was caused by no values
> > falling in
> > that particular probability bin. Previous versions of METviewer
> > connected
> > the reliability line across that NA value, but mv2.6 plotted it as
a
> > "hole". Tatiana just fixed it and redeployed mv2.6. Please try
> > running
> > again and confirm that:
> > (1) The warning message is gone and (2) the lines of the
> > reliability
> > diagram now connect across that NA value.
> >
> > mv2.6 includes some code consolidation and cleanup and this small
> > change
> > was likely an unintended consequence of that. Fortunately, it was
> > very
> > easy to fix.
> >
> > Please let us know if you have other questions or encounter any
> > unexpected
> > behavior.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:29 AM matthew.pyle at noaa.gov via RT <
> > met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Fri Aug 10 11:28:37 2018: Request 86554 was acted upon.
> > > Transaction: Ticket created by Matthew.Pyle at noaa.gov
> > > Queue: met_help
> > > Subject: METviewer 2.6 issues?
> > > Owner: Nobody
> > > Requestors: Matthew.Pyle at noaa.gov
> > > Status: new
> > > Ticket <URL:
> > > https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=86554 >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I had been making reliability diagrams using v2.5 without issue,
> > > but with
> > > the upgrade to v2.6 I'm getting this warning:
> > >
> > > ==== Start Rscript error ==== Warning message: In if
> > > (is.na(listStat))
> > { :
> > > the condition has length > 1 and only the first element will be
> > > used ====
> > > End Rscript error ====
> > >
> > > The plot generally looks normal except it has a gap in the
middle
> > > of the
> > > curves (at 0.45 on x-axis).
> > >
> > > Does this change in behavior make sense based on the v2.6
changes -
> > > maybe
> > > the inclusion of confidence intervals? Is there something I can
> > > try
> > > changing to avoid this issue?
> > >
> > > ROC curves give me the same warning and no data plotted, but I
have
> > > less
> > > experience making that plot type.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------
Subject: METviewer 2.6 issues?
From: "matthew.pyle at noaa.gov"
Time: Fri Aug 10 14:04:00 2018
Hi Tatiana,
Thanks for that quick fix. I can now plot reliabiliity diagrams for
multiple models simultaneously.
-Matt
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Tatiana Burek via RT
<met_help at ucar.edu>
wrote:
> Mat,
> I apply another fix that should allow you to plot multiple models
> simultaneously.
>
> Tatiana
> On Fri Aug 10 13:03:54 2018, Matthew.Pyle at noaa.gov wrote:
> > Hi John/Tatiana,
> >
> > Thanks for the quick response. It does eliminate the warning
message
> > and
> > the gap with reliability , BUT...
> >
> > now it seems to be unable to plot multiple models simultaneously.
> > Plotting
> > each model individually looks fine (and fills in the gap as
needed).
> > I'm
> > not seeing any warnings/errors why only one model is actually
plotted.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 2:39 PM, John Halley Gotway via RT <
> > met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Matt,
> > >
> > > Thanks for letting us know about this change in behavior in
mv2.6.
> > > Tatiana
> > > looked into it and found that the hole was caused by no values
> > > falling in
> > > that particular probability bin. Previous versions of METviewer
> > > connected
> > > the reliability line across that NA value, but mv2.6 plotted it
as a
> > > "hole". Tatiana just fixed it and redeployed mv2.6. Please try
> > > running
> > > again and confirm that:
> > > (1) The warning message is gone and (2) the lines of the
> > > reliability
> > > diagram now connect across that NA value.
> > >
> > > mv2.6 includes some code consolidation and cleanup and this
small
> > > change
> > > was likely an unintended consequence of that. Fortunately, it
was
> > > very
> > > easy to fix.
> > >
> > > Please let us know if you have other questions or encounter any
> > > unexpected
> > > behavior.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:29 AM matthew.pyle at noaa.gov via RT <
> > > met_help at ucar.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Fri Aug 10 11:28:37 2018: Request 86554 was acted upon.
> > > > Transaction: Ticket created by Matthew.Pyle at noaa.gov
> > > > Queue: met_help
> > > > Subject: METviewer 2.6 issues?
> > > > Owner: Nobody
> > > > Requestors: Matthew.Pyle at noaa.gov
> > > > Status: new
> > > > Ticket <URL:
> > > > https://rt.rap.ucar.edu/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=86554 >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I had been making reliability diagrams using v2.5 without
issue,
> > > > but with
> > > > the upgrade to v2.6 I'm getting this warning:
> > > >
> > > > ==== Start Rscript error ==== Warning message: In if
> > > > (is.na(listStat))
> > > { :
> > > > the condition has length > 1 and only the first element will
be
> > > > used ====
> > > > End Rscript error ====
> > > >
> > > > The plot generally looks normal except it has a gap in the
middle
> > > > of the
> > > > curves (at 0.45 on x-axis).
> > > >
> > > > Does this change in behavior make sense based on the v2.6
changes -
> > > > maybe
> > > > the inclusion of confidence intervals? Is there something I
can
> > > > try
> > > > changing to avoid this issue?
> > > >
> > > > ROC curves give me the same warning and no data plotted, but I
have
> > > > less
> > > > experience making that plot type.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------
More information about the Met_help
mailing list